zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Qingdao Walrus Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

18.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Qingdao Walrus Packaging Co., Ltd. is a China-based packaging supplier located in Shandong, with listed products including moving straps, PET strapping, and jumbo woven bags. The supplier shows credible platform presence through 8 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. Its recent business performance is moderate-to-strong, with 60+ orders and CN¥3.6M+ transaction value over the past six months. However, the company’s physical production scale appears relatively limited based on the provided factory area of 150+㎡ and 40+ staff. Customer feedback is positive with a 5.0 store rating, but the review base is small at only 5 reviews. Service responsiveness is acceptable at ≤2 hours, while data on Full Customization and finished product inspection is insufficient. Overall, this supplier is more suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ packaging products, trial orders, or moderately scaled procurement rather than large-volume strategic sourcing requiring extensive factory capacity validation.

Qingdao Walrus Packaging Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Shandong, China
- Factory area: 150+㎡
- Staff size: 40+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a defined operating location and a disclosed workforce of 40+ staff, indicating an established business with basic production and service capacity. The verified supplier status provides some level of operational credibility. However, the listed factory area of 150+㎡ is relatively small, which limits evidence of large-scale manufacturing capability.

Scoring Rationale:
Although the company has staff, location transparency, and verification support, the production scale data does not indicate a large or highly industrialized factory base. The company appears to have basic manufacturing capability rather than large-scale supply chain strength.

Final Score: 12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: 3D design capabilities, Low MOQ for customization, Warranty available
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. An 8-year Gold Supplier history suggests long-term platform continuity, while Trade Assurance provides transaction protection for buyers. The supplier also has visible capability labels, including design capability, customization-related MOQ support, and warranty availability.

Scoring Rationale:
The combination of long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status gives the supplier a relatively complete credibility structure. However, no specific third-party factory certification or product compliance certification is provided, so the score should not reach the maximum range.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Past 6-month orders: 60+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥3.6M+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Review count: 5

Elaboration:
The supplier shows active recent commercial performance, with over 60 orders and more than CN¥3.6M in transaction value over the past six months. This indicates market activity and confirmed platform transactions. The 5.0 rating is positive, but the review count is limited, reducing the depth of customer validation.

Scoring Rationale:
The transaction amount is relatively strong and order activity is visible, supporting a stable business performance assessment. However, only 5 reviews are available, which limits confidence in broad customer satisfaction consistency.

Final Score: 16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Related labels: 3D design capabilities, Low MOQ for customization

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of ≤2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. The platform labels suggest some customization-related capability, especially low MOQ customization and 3D design support. However, there is no explicit confirmation of Full Customization.

Scoring Rationale:
Service capability appears solid but not fully proven. The supplier responds within a reasonable timeframe and has customization-related labels, but the absence of clear Full Customization data prevents a higher score.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery metric provided. This suggests reliable execution for recorded platform transactions.

Scoring Rationale:
Based on the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 range. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the full score for this dimension.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 5.0
- Review count: 5
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True / verified supplier status provided

Elaboration:
The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, which is positive, but the review base is very small. Verified supplier status adds some credibility to the quality assurance profile. However, there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection or detailed quality management certification.

Scoring Rationale:
The rating is strong, and supplier verification supports baseline confidence. Nevertheless, the limited number of reviews and insufficient data on finished product inspection prevent the supplier from being assessed as having a complete quality assurance system.

Final Score: 14 / 20

Total Score

77 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order scope. Qingdao Walrus Packaging Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ packaging products, sample orders, trial procurement, or moderate-volume sourcing supported by Trade Assurance. The main risks are limited disclosed factory scale, only 5 customer reviews, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection and Full Customization. Its growth potential lies in its 8-year Gold Supplier history, CN¥3.6M+ recent transaction value, 100.0% on-time delivery rate, and customization-related platform labels. For larger or long-term procurement programs, buyers should request factory audit documents, inspection procedures, production capacity evidence, and more detailed quality control records before scaling orders.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Qingdao Sanyuan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Sanyuan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Huaisheng Packaging Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Huaisheng Packaging Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Bolaiyuan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Bolaiyuan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Zhongjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Zhongjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Dinghe Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Dinghe Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Junmei Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Junmei Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dingjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dingjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuyun Packaging (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuyun Packaging (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gongying Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gongying Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xiangnian Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xiangnian Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qianxun Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qianxun Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Dotprint Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Dotprint Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yumiao Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yumiao Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yumeng Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yumeng Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Everwin Packaging Products Company Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Everwin Packaging Products Company Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Am Packaging Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Am Packaging Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yukang Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yukang Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Comfort Plastic Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Comfort Plastic Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Beijing Chengtai Environmental Protection Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Chengtai Environmental Protection Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jiujiu New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jiujiu New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jieyang Denixi Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jieyang Denixi Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wujiang Wanping Longhua Electromechanical Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wujiang Wanping Longhua Electromechanical Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Green Microvision Health Service Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Green Microvision Health Service Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Homan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Homan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huangyan Ruiying Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huangyan Ruiying Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Shangkai Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Shangkai Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Guoxing Wire Mesh Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Guoxing Wire Mesh Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Ledio Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Ledio Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lvgu Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lvgu Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huizhong Industrial Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huizhong Industrial Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Nexus Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Nexus Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoji Qixin Titanium Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoji Qixin Titanium Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou By Toys Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou By Toys Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Huolang Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Huolang Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Youlike Houseware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Youlike Houseware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gaomi Rongda Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gaomi Rongda Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Deem Electronic & Electric Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Deem Electronic & Electric Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Teraysun Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Teraysun Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026