zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Ropenet Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

18.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Ropenet Group Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of over 57,000㎡ and more than 220 staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to have a relatively solid production foundation, supported by verified supplier status and a broad rope, cord, net, and related textile-product portfolio. Its platform credibility is strong, with 19 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and several commercial and quality-related labels including finished product inspection, ODM service, warranty availability, and full customization. However, business performance visibility is limited because the past six-month order volume and transaction value are not provided. Customer feedback is also thin, with only one review despite a 5.0 store rating. The major concern is delivery performance, as the reported on-time dispatch rate is 0.0%. This supplier may be suitable for buyers prioritizing manufacturing scale and platform credibility, but delivery reliability requires careful verification before cooperation.

Ropenet Group Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory location: Shandong, China
  • Factory area: 57,000+㎡
  • Employees: 220+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

Ropenet Group Co., Ltd. demonstrates a meaningful physical production base. A factory area exceeding 57,000㎡ indicates relatively strong space capacity for production, storage, processing, or operational support. The reported workforce of over 220 staff suggests the company is not a small workshop-level supplier and has the human-resource base to support regular manufacturing activities.

The verified supplier status further strengthens the company’s basic credibility from a factory-capability perspective. However, the provided data does not include detailed production lines, monthly capacity, machinery quantity, export volume, or factory audit reports, so the assessment cannot confirm the full depth of its manufacturing scale beyond the stated factory size and employee count.

Scoring Rationale

The company has clear indicators of a medium-to-large production base, especially due to its large factory area and verified supplier status. The employee count is solid, though not enough by itself to classify the company as a very large-scale supplier. Because detailed production capacity data is missing, the score should not reach the maximum range.

Final Score

17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 19 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 19-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance support also improves buyer protection during transactions.

The listed labels show a relatively complete commercial and compliance-support structure, including warranty availability, finished product inspection, ODM service, and full customization. These tags suggest that the supplier presents itself as capable of both standardized and customized orders. However, the data does not provide third-party certificates, ISO certifications, product-specific compliance documents, or named audit institutions, so the assessment is limited to the platform-level credibility information provided.

Scoring Rationale

The platform profile is one of the strongest parts of this supplier. Long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple service/quality labels create a credible platform-backed supplier image. The only reason the score is not perfect is the absence of specific third-party certification details or formal factory audit documentation in the provided data.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Past 6-month order volume: Insufficient Data
  • Past 6-month transaction value: Insufficient Data
  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 1

Elaboration

The supplier has a perfect listed store rating of 5.0, but this rating is based on only one review. Therefore, the rating alone has limited statistical reliability. More importantly, the key commercial performance indicators — past six-month order volume and transaction value — are not provided.

Without recent order count or transaction amount, it is not possible to confirm whether the supplier has strong, moderate, or weak recent market traction on the platform. The available data supports only a limited conclusion: the supplier has at least some customer feedback, but commercial performance visibility is insufficient.

Scoring Rationale

The 5.0 rating is positive, but the very low review count and missing transaction data materially weaken the business-performance assessment. Since recent order activity and sales value are unavailable, the supplier cannot be scored as having strong verified commercial performance.

Final Score

10 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤5h
  • Full customization: Listed as available
  • ODM service: Listed as available

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within five hours indicates acceptable communication responsiveness, though it does not meet the strongest level of under one hour. The availability of full customization and ODM service suggests the supplier can support customized product requirements rather than only selling standard products.

This is relevant for buyers sourcing ropes, cords, nets, or related products where specifications such as material, size, color, structure, packaging, or application requirements may vary. However, the provided data does not include evidence of customization case studies, engineering team size, sampling lead time, or design support capability.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows practical service capability through acceptable response speed and customization-related platform labels. However, response time is not at the highest standard, and customization depth cannot be fully validated from the available data.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 0.0%

Elaboration

Delivery performance is the weakest reported area. A 0.0% on-time dispatch rate is materially below the 70% threshold and indicates a serious delivery-performance concern based strictly on the provided data.

The data does not explain whether this figure is caused by insufficient recent orders, abnormal platform statistics, delayed shipments, or missing operational records. However, because the scoring must be based on the provided value, the reported delivery metric creates a major risk for buyers who require reliable lead times and predictable shipment schedules.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate below 70% should receive below 5 points. Since the reported rate is 0.0%, the supplier receives a very low delivery score. This should be verified directly before placing time-sensitive orders.

Final Score

2 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Review count: 1
  • Finished product inspection: Listed as available
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive quality signal through a 5.0 store rating and the presence of finished product inspection. Verified supplier status also adds some confidence that the company has passed a basic supplier-verification process.

However, the customer feedback base is very limited because there is only one review. A single review is not enough to establish consistent product quality, complaint handling, defect rate, or repeat-buyer satisfaction. The data also does not include detailed inspection standards, quality certificates, product test reports, or customer complaint records.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has several useful quality-related indicators, especially finished product inspection and verified supplier status. However, the extremely limited review volume prevents the supplier from being classified as having strongly validated customer satisfaction. The quality system appears present at a basic-to-good level, but customer feedback evidence remains insufficient.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

69 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation can be considered with caution. Ropenet Group Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers who value factory scale, long-term platform presence, Trade Assurance, and customization capability. It may be appropriate for sourcing ropes, cords, nets, and related products where supplier scale and platform credibility are important.

Key risks include insufficient recent transaction data, only one customer review, and a reported 0.0% on-time dispatch rate. Before placing bulk or time-sensitive orders, buyers should verify production capacity, lead time, recent shipment records, inspection process, and delivery reliability. The supplier shows growth potential due to its factory scale, 19-year Gold Supplier history, and customization labels, but delivery performance and commercial validation require further confirmation.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

X.J. Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
X.J. Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Demax Group Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Demax Group Supplier Evaluation
King Sml Group Supplier Evaluation
King Sml Group Supplier Evaluation
Fortune Technology Group Supplier Evaluation
Fortune Technology Group Supplier Evaluation
Ruidong Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruidong Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Health & Health (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Health & Health (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beifa Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beifa Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Andeli Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Andeli Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sany Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sany Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taitian Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taitian Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fangyuan Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fangyuan Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Tomato Group Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Tomato Group Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topko Product Group Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topko Product Group Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Everich Commerce Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
Everich Commerce Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hk Bd Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hk Bd Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Bridge Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Bridge Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Huashang Group Co. ,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Henan Huashang Group Co. ,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wale Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wale Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ap Group (China) Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Ap Group (China) Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Desing Farm Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Desing Farm Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Zhejiang Meizhoubao Industrial And Commercial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Meizhoubao Industrial And Commercial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou By Toys Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou By Toys Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Annilte Transmission System Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Annilte Transmission System Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Huidong Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Huidong Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Qianxun Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Qianxun Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Haojia Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Haojia Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Lianya Boat Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Lianya Boat Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Mh Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Mh Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Youli Electric And Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Youli Electric And Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Mind Golden Card System Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Mind Golden Card System Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shenli Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shenli Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Wonray Rubber Tire Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Wonray Rubber Tire Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangqiu Jingcheng Measuring Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangqiu Jingcheng Measuring Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sihai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sihai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Langle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Langle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qinghe County Aoyu Fluff Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qinghe County Aoyu Fluff Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongcheng Jinlong Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongcheng Jinlong Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jingwei Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jingwei Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Connection Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Connection Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Landsign Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Landsign Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026