Shandong Goodyear Bioscience Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Shandong Goodyear Bioscience Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, offering agricultural input products such as fulvic acid powder fertilizer, potassium humate, humic acid compounds, and related water-soluble agrochemical products. The company shows a moderate physical operating base with a reported factory area of 6,200+ m², 10+ staff, and verified supplier status. On , it has 2 years as a Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and displays service-related tags including Full Customization, ODM service, warranty availability, and response time within 2 hours. Its recent business performance is reasonably validated by 20+ orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a high store rating of 4.9, though the review count is limited at 8. Delivery performance is strong with a 100.0% on-time shipment rate. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium scale sourcing of humic/fulvic acid fertilizer-related products, especially where platform protection and responsive communication are important.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Shandong, China
- Factory area: 6,200+ m²
- Employees: 10+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope includes fulvic acid fertilizer, potassium humate, humic acid compounds, and water-soluble agrochemical-related products
Elaboration
The reported factory area of 6,200+ m² indicates a physical production or operating base beyond a very small trading setup. However, the employee count of only 10+ staff suggests a relatively lean organization. The verified supplier status provides some platform-level confidence that the supplier has undergone verification, but the provided data does not include detailed factory audit reports, production line quantity, annual capacity, equipment details, or quality management certifications.
The company appears to focus on fertilizer and soil amendment-related chemical products, particularly humic and fulvic acid categories. This shows a degree of product specialization, but the available data is not sufficient to confirm large-scale manufacturing depth or vertically integrated production capability.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a measurable factory area and verified supplier status, which supports a baseline level of operational credibility. However, the limited employee count and lack of disclosed production capacity, equipment information, or formal factory certification details prevent it from being classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. It is stronger than a supplier with no physical data, but the scale indicators are closer to a small-to-mid-sized operation.
Final Score
13 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Full customization, ODM service available, Response time ≤2h
- Verified supplier: True
- Formal third-party product or management certifications: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility markers. A 2-year Gold Supplier status indicates some operating history on the platform, although it is still relatively short compared with long-established suppliers. Trade Assurance is a positive buyer-protection mechanism, reducing transaction risk for platform-based orders. Verified supplier status further supports basic credibility.
The available tags suggest service and transaction support capabilities, including warranty availability, customization, and ODM service. However, the data does not provide evidence of internationally recognized certifications, product compliance documents, quality system certifications, or detailed audit credentials. Therefore, compliance credibility is mainly platform-based rather than certification-based.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core credibility components: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. The main limitation is the short 2-year Gold Supplier history and the absence of detailed compliance or certification documentation. This places the supplier in the range of a platform-credible supplier with core protections, but not yet a long-term or fully certified supplier profile.
Final Score
16 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 20+
- Transaction amount in past 6 months: CN¥1M+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Review count: 8
Elaboration
The supplier has achieved 20+ orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value over the past six months, which indicates real recent commercial activity. The transaction value is relatively meaningful and suggests that the supplier is not inactive or purely untested on the platform. The store rating of 4.9 is strong and indicates positive buyer satisfaction among recorded reviews.
However, the review count is only 8, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. A high score based on a small number of reviews is positive but not enough to confirm broad market acceptance or long-term consistency. The order count is moderate rather than high-volume, and there is no data on repeat buyers, export markets, major customers, or annual sales scale.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates credible recent sales with CN¥1M+ in six-month transaction value and 20+ orders. This supports a stable but not high-volume commercial profile. The 4.9 rating is a strength, but the small number of reviews limits confidence. Overall, the business performance is above basic validation but below the level of suppliers with high order volume, extensive reviews, and larger transaction histories.
Final Score
15 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Platform tag: Full customization
- Platform tag: ODM service available
- Platform tag: Warranty available
Elaboration
The supplier shows solid service capability based on the response time and customization-related tags. A response time within 2 hours is commercially acceptable and indicates the supplier is likely able to handle inquiries efficiently. The Full Customization and ODM service tags suggest that the supplier can support more than standard product transactions, although the provided data does not describe specific customization scope, formulation capabilities, packaging options, private label services, or technical support process.
Warranty availability is also positive, but there is no detailed warranty policy provided. Therefore, the service profile is favorable but not fully transparent.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier meets the standard for responsive communication and has clear customization-related platform tags. However, the response time is ≤2h rather than ≤1h, and customization details are not provided. This supports a strong but not top-tier service score.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time shipment rate: 100.0%
Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time shipment rate, which is a strong delivery indicator. This suggests that, for the recorded platform transactions, the supplier has met agreed shipment timelines. Reliable delivery is particularly important for agricultural input buyers that may need products aligned with seasonal application cycles.
However, the data does not include the number of shipments behind this percentage, average lead time, production lead time, logistics method, or historical delivery performance over a longer period. Therefore, the delivery score should reflect the excellent reported metric while recognizing that the supporting sample depth is not disclosed.
Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the provided data, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery-performance range because the on-time shipment rate is above 90%. The lack of shipment-volume detail prevents additional qualitative confidence, but the numeric indicator itself is very strong.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Review count: 8
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification report is Insufficient Data
- Product or quality certifications: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s 4.9 store rating is a positive indicator of customer satisfaction. However, the review count of 8 is limited, so the rating should be interpreted cautiously. Verified supplier status provides some credibility, but the data does not confirm whether Finished Product Inspection is available, whether a detailed factory verification report exists, or whether the supplier has formal quality management certifications.
The product list includes fertilizer and agrochemical-related items, including one product title mentioning “Omri Certified Organic Agrochemicals.” However, this appears only in the product title provided and is not supported by separate certification data. Therefore, it cannot be treated as confirmed certification for the company or product line.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a high rating and some platform verification, which supports a positive quality impression. Nevertheless, the limited review count and absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory verification documentation, and independent quality certifications reduce the score. The quality profile is acceptable but not fully substantiated.
Final Score
14 / 20
Total Score
76 / 100
Score breakdown:
- Company Strength: 13 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 16 / 20
- Business Performance: 15 / 20
- Service Capability: 8 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 14 / 20
Procurement Recommendation
Shandong Goodyear Bioscience Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers seeking -based sourcing of fulvic acid, potassium humate, humic acid, and related fertilizer/agrochemical products with Trade Assurance protection.
The supplier is most suitable for:
- Small-to-medium buyers seeking moderate-volume procurement
- Buyers prioritizing responsive communication and customization support
- Importers or distributors willing to validate product quality before scaling orders
- Buyers who prefer transactions protected by Trade Assurance
Key risk points:
- Employee scale is limited at 10+ staff, which may restrict large-volume production confidence
- Review count is low at 8, despite the strong 4.9 rating
- Finished Product Inspection information is not provided
- Detailed factory audit, production capacity, and quality certification data are insufficient
- Compliance claims beyond platform tags cannot be confirmed from the provided data
Growth potential is moderate. The supplier already shows verified platform credibility, CN¥1M+ recent transaction value, strong delivery performance, and customization-related service tags. If it can provide stronger quality documentation, more customer feedback, clearer production capacity data, and formal inspection or certification records, it could become more suitable for larger or more compliance-sensitive procurement programs.
Leave your comment