Shandong Qinglan Sanitary Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shandong Qinglan Sanitary Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong Province, focused on disposable underpad products for hospital, elderly care, and absorbent protection applications. The company reports a factory area of over 12,000㎡ and more than 50 staff, with verified supplier status, indicating a basic-to-mid scale manufacturing foundation rather than a large-scale supply chain operation. Its product listings show consistent underpad-related categories, low MOQ of 10 pieces, and a broad listed price range of CN¥0.1353–1.15, which may suit buyers requiring sample testing, small trial orders, or flexible procurement. However, platform credibility is limited by only 1 year of Gold Supplier status and no Trade Assurance support. Business performance data is weak, with missing order volume, missing transaction value, no store rating, and zero reviews. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for cautious trial cooperation, but not yet ideal for buyers requiring strong commercial validation or mature platform credibility.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shandong Province, China
- Factory area: 12,000+㎡
- Staff size: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a reported factory area above 12,000㎡, which indicates a physical production base of moderate scale. The staff size of 50+ suggests the company has basic operational and production capacity, but the available data does not support classification as a large-scale manufacturer. Verified supplier status provides some factory credibility, though no additional factory audit details, production lines, annual output, or capacity figures are provided.

Scoring Rationale
The factory area is relatively solid, but the employee count remains moderate. The company appears to have a stable manufacturing base, yet the lack of detailed production scale data prevents a higher score. It fits the category of a mid-sized stable factory rather than a large-scale supply chain supplier.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: False
- Certification / platform labels: Finished product inspection, Full customization, ODM service available, Response time ≤23h
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has Gold Supplier status, but only for 1 year, which limits the strength of long-term platform credibility. The absence of Trade Assurance is a notable weakness because it reduces transaction protection for buyers. The available platform labels show some operational and service capabilities, including finished product inspection and ODM availability, but there is no data confirming internationally recognized product certifications or industry-specific compliance certificates.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has basic platform credibility through Gold Supplier and verified supplier status, but the short membership duration and lack of Trade Assurance weaken buyer confidence. The compliance profile is partially supported by platform labels, but not complete enough for a high credibility score.

Final Score
13 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month order volume: Insufficient Data
- Past 6-month transaction value: Insufficient Data
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
There is no available data for recent order volume, transaction amount, or store rating. The review count is listed as 0, meaning there is no visible customer feedback record in the provided dataset. This makes it difficult to verify market acceptance, repeat purchasing, transaction stability, or buyer satisfaction through platform performance indicators.

Scoring Rationale
Because core business performance indicators are missing and the review count is zero, the supplier lacks commercial validation from the provided data. Even if the company has manufacturing capacity, the absence of transaction and rating evidence creates a significant uncertainty for procurement evaluation.

Final Score
6 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤23h
- Full customization: Listed
- ODM service available: Listed

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time is within 23 hours, which indicates normal communication availability but not fast-response service. The presence of Full customization and ODM service labels suggests the supplier may support customized procurement requirements. However, no detailed customization scope, sampling lead time, design capability, or communication performance data is provided.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates basic service capability through customization and ODM labels, but the response time is not within the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Therefore, the supplier is suitable for standard inquiry handling and potential customization discussions, but cannot be rated as highly responsive based on the provided data.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator in the provided dataset. This suggests that recorded shipments have been delivered on schedule. However, the data does not include the number of orders behind this percentage, so the reliability of this figure depends on an unknown transaction base.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score, while noting that the underlying order volume is not disclosed.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished product inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a Finished product inspection label and verified supplier status, which provide some quality assurance signals. However, there is no store rating and no customer reviews available in the provided data. As a result, actual buyer satisfaction, complaint history, product consistency, and post-delivery quality performance cannot be verified.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has basic quality-control indicators, but the absence of customer feedback significantly limits confidence. A higher score would require visible ratings, meaningful review volume, and stronger evidence of quality management systems or product certifications.

Final Score
12 / 20

Total Score

64 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended only on a cautious trial basis. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking disposable underpad products, low-MOQ sampling, flexible customization discussion, or early-stage supplier development. The main risks are weak business performance visibility, zero reviews, missing transaction data, no store rating, short Gold Supplier history, and lack of Trade Assurance. Its growth potential lies in its moderate factory scale, verified supplier status, finished product inspection label, ODM availability, and reported 100.0% on-time delivery rate. For formal procurement, buyers should first request samples, confirm quality standards, verify production capacity, and use controlled initial orders before scaling cooperation.