Shenzhen Chl Weaving Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shenzhen CHL Weaving Co., Ltd is a Guangdong, China-based apparel supplier with a reported factory area of 1,300+㎡ and 40+ staff. The company appears to operate as a small-to-lower-mid scale manufacturer with basic production capacity and verified supplier status. Its listed products focus on women’s apparel such as linen shirts, cotton tops, blouses, and casual fashion garments, with low MOQs of 2 pieces, making it potentially suitable for small-batch buyers, boutique retailers, sample-driven procurement, and customized apparel sourcing.

The supplier has strong platform credibility, including 6 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, Full Customization, and Warranty Available tags. However, commercial performance is limited, with only 9 orders and CN¥13.5K+ transaction value in the past six months. Customer feedback is weak due to 0 reviews and no available store rating. The most significant concern is delivery reliability, with an on-time shipment rate of only 33.3%.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 points

Basis

• Company: Shenzhen CHL Weaving Co., Ltd
• Location: Guangdong, China
• Factory area: 1,300+㎡
• Employees: 40+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a clearly stated physical manufacturing base with 1,300+㎡ of factory space and more than 40 employees. This indicates a real operating structure rather than a purely trading-oriented profile, although the scale remains relatively modest compared with larger apparel manufacturers. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s operational existence and basic factory profile.

The company’s size suggests it may be better positioned for flexible, small-batch, or customized garment production rather than very large-volume, high-capacity global supply programs. The low MOQs shown across listed products also align with a smaller-scale or flexible production model.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability supported by factory area, staff count, and verified supplier status. However, the scale of 1,300+㎡ and 40+ staff does not indicate a large-scale supply chain operation. It fits more closely into a small but operationally established factory category. The verification status improves confidence, but available data does not show large production capacity, advanced production lines, annual output, or major factory certifications beyond supplier verification.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier tenure: 6 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / industry labels:
• Warranty available
• Finished product inspection
• ODM service available
• Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively strong platform profile. A 6-year Gold Supplier history indicates a meaningful period of platform presence, while Trade Assurance provides transaction-level protection for buyers. The available labels also strengthen the supplier’s compliance and service profile, particularly Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, Full Customization, and Warranty Available.

These indicators suggest that the supplier has a comparatively complete platform credibility framework. The presence of both transaction protection and inspection-related labels is especially relevant for international buyers seeking risk reduction in apparel procurement.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets several important credibility criteria: multi-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and multiple relevant platform labels. The 6-year tenure is not short-term and supports a stable platform history. While the data does not provide details on third-party factory audit reports, international certifications, or compliance standards, the available platform-backed indicators are strong.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 9
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥13.5K+
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Reviews: 0

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded transaction activity in the past six months, but the volume is limited. Nine orders and CN¥13.5K+ in transaction value indicate that the supplier is commercially active, but the scale of recent business performance is relatively low. The absence of a store rating and the presence of 0 reviews significantly reduce the ability to validate buyer satisfaction and repeat-market confidence.

For procurement teams, this means the supplier has some evidence of platform transactions but lacks strong commercial proof. The data does not support a conclusion that the supplier has high order flow, large transaction volume, or broad customer validation.

Scoring Rationale

Business performance is one of the weaker areas. The supplier has recent orders and sales, but both order count and transaction value are low. More importantly, there are no customer reviews and no available store rating, which limits confidence in market acceptance and buyer experience. The score is therefore placed below the basic low-transaction range because commercial validation is incomplete.

Final Score

9 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• Full Customization: Available
• ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for sourcing communication. It is not at the strongest level of ≤1 hour, but it is still within a reasonable range for supplier responsiveness. The presence of Full Customization and ODM service availability suggests the supplier can support customized apparel development or buyer-specific product adjustments.

This service capability is particularly relevant for buyers seeking low MOQ, flexible design, or customized garment orders. However, the data does not provide additional evidence on sampling speed, design team size, technical support, or after-sales response quality.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good service capability due to its ≤3h response time and availability of Full Customization and ODM service. However, because the response time is not ≤1 hour and there is no further data on service workflow or communication quality, it does not qualify for the highest service score. The supplier fits the “normal response with customization capability” level.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 points

Basis

• On-time shipment rate: 33.3%

Elaboration

The on-time shipment rate is the most serious weakness in the supplier profile. A 33.3% on-time shipment rate indicates that only about one-third of shipments were dispatched on time according to the available platform data. For procurement, this creates significant concern around production scheduling, order management, and delivery reliability.

This issue is especially important for buyers with seasonal apparel requirements, retail launch deadlines, promotional campaigns, or strict logistics windows. Even if the supplier offers customization and low MOQs, poor delivery performance may create operational risk for time-sensitive orders.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate below 70% should receive below 5 points. At 33.3%, the supplier’s delivery performance is substantially below acceptable procurement expectations. The low score reflects a clear and measurable delivery risk based strictly on the provided data.

Final Score

3 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 points

Basis

• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Reviews: 0
• Finished Product Inspection: Available
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, including Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. These are positive signs because they suggest that product inspection processes and supplier verification are present on the platform profile. However, customer-facing quality validation is very limited because there are no reviews and no available store rating.

In apparel procurement, buyer reviews and store ratings are important because they help validate actual product quality, consistency, communication, and after-sales handling. Without this feedback, quality confidence depends mainly on platform labels rather than proven customer experience.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic quality assurance support through Finished Product Inspection and factory/supplier verification. However, the lack of customer reviews and unavailable store rating prevent a higher score. The supplier cannot be assessed as having strong customer-proven quality performance based on the current data. The score reflects a mixed profile: some quality control structure exists, but customer feedback evidence is insufficient.

Final Score

11 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation only.

Shenzhen CHL Weaving Co., Ltd may be suitable for buyers seeking small-batch women’s apparel sourcing, low MOQ orders, customized garments, ODM support, and flexible sampling or boutique-style procurement. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility, 6-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and verified supplier status.

However, this supplier is not recommended for urgent, large-scale, or delivery-critical procurement without further verification. The main risks are the very low on-time shipment rate of 33.3%, limited recent business volume, 0 reviews, and unavailable store rating. These factors reduce confidence in commercial reliability and customer-validated quality.

For initial cooperation, buyers should consider small trial orders, Trade Assurance transactions, clear delivery terms, pre-shipment inspection, and written confirmation of production lead time. Growth potential exists if the supplier improves delivery reliability and accumulates stronger customer feedback.