Shishi Yiming Dyeing And Weaving Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shishi Yiming Dyeing And Weaving Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Fujian, with a reported factory area of over 160,000㎡ and more than 1,400 staff. Based on the provided data, the company demonstrates strong manufacturing scale, long-term platform credibility, and verified supplier status. Its listed product scope is concentrated in nylon and polyamide yarn-related products, including N66 monofilament nylon yarn, polyamide textured yarn, and transparent yarn. The supplier has been an Gold Supplier for 14 years, supports Trade Assurance, and provides customization-related services, including Full Customization and ODM service availability.

Commercial performance appears stable, with over 20 orders and more than CN¥2.2M transaction value in the past six months. However, customer feedback depth is limited because only one review is available, despite a 5.0 store rating. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking medium-to-large volume nylon/polyamide yarn sourcing with verified factory scale and strong platform credibility.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Weight: 20 points

Basis

• Company name: Shishi Yiming Dyeing And Weaving Co., Ltd.
• Country: China
• Province: Fujian
• Factory area: 160,000+㎡
• Employees: 1,400+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory verification: True

Elaboration

The supplier presents a large-scale manufacturing profile based on both physical factory area and workforce size. A factory area exceeding 160,000㎡ and more than 1,400 staff indicate substantial production infrastructure and operational capacity. These figures suggest that the company is not a small trading operation but a sizable manufacturing entity with the potential to support bulk production requirements.

The presence of verified supplier status further strengthens the reliability of the company profile. While the provided data does not include detailed production line numbers, annual capacity, machinery lists, or specific factory audit reports, the available scale indicators are strong enough to support a positive assessment of manufacturing strength.

Scoring Rationale

Given the large factory footprint, significant employee base, and verified supplier status, the company fits the profile of a large-scale stable supplier. The lack of additional details such as exact production capacity, equipment count, or third-party audit report limits the ability to assign a perfect score with complete confidence, but the available indicators are still very strong.

Final Score

19 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Weight: 20 points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 14 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• ODM service available
• Full customization
• Minor customization
• Response time ≤6h
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a long platform history, with 14 years as a Gold Supplier. This is a strong credibility indicator because it reflects long-term platform presence and continued supplier account activity. Trade Assurance support further improves transaction security for buyers, especially for international procurement where payment and delivery risk control are important.

The supplier also carries several operational tags related to customization and service capability. These tags support the view that the company can handle different levels of buyer requirements, from minor customization to full customization. Verified supplier status adds another layer of credibility, although the data does not specify the exact scope or issuer of the verification.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 14 years Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and customization-related platform tags represents a highly credible platform profile. The only limitation is that no detailed compliance certificates, such as ISO, OEKO-TEX, GRS, or other textile-related certifications, were provided. Therefore, while platform credibility is excellent, broader compliance documentation is marked as insufficient.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Weight: 20 points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 20+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2.2M+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 20 orders and over CN¥2.2M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates real commercial activity and suggests that the supplier has completed measurable transactions on the platform. The transaction value is relatively meaningful compared with the order count, implying that at least some orders may have had moderate to high value.

The store rating is 5.0, which is positive. However, the review count is only 1, meaning the rating base is extremely limited. A single review is not sufficient to fully validate broad customer satisfaction or repeat buyer confidence. Therefore, while sales activity is confirmed, public customer feedback is not yet deep enough to fully support a top-tier business performance score.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable transaction activity and a solid six-month transaction amount. However, the order count is moderate rather than high, and the review base is very limited. This places the supplier in the category of stable medium-scale commercial performance rather than a high-volume, highly reviewed supplier.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Weight: 10 points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤6h
• Full customization: Available
• Minor customization: Available
• ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier provides several customization-related services, including Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service availability. This indicates that the supplier may be able to support buyers with specific product requirements rather than only offering standard catalog items. For nylon and polyamide yarn procurement, customization capability can be important for specifications such as yarn type, diameter, texture, color, or application requirements, although the provided data does not specify which exact parameters can be customized.

The response time is listed as ≤6 hours. This is acceptable for international B2B communication, but it does not reach the highest service benchmark of response within one hour.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good service capability due to its customization tags and acceptable response time. However, since the response time is not ≤1 hour and no additional data is provided regarding dedicated account management, technical support, sample lead time, or after-sales process, the score should remain in the good but not maximum range.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Weight: 10 points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Based on the scoring standard, any on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest scoring range. This is a strong indicator of delivery reliability within the available platform data.

However, the data does not provide the number of shipments used to calculate the on-time delivery rate, nor does it include average lead time, production cycle, export logistics capability, or delay handling records. Therefore, the assessment is based strictly on the provided on-time shipment percentage.

Scoring Rationale

A 100.0% on-time delivery rate directly supports a top score under the stated evaluation criteria. Although shipment volume behind the percentage is not disclosed, the provided metric itself is excellent.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Weight: 20 points

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1
• Verified supplier / factory verification: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is positive, but the available review count is only 1. This means that while the visible rating is excellent, the reliability of the rating as a broad customer satisfaction indicator is limited. A larger number of reviews would be needed to more confidently assess consistency in product quality, service experience, and post-delivery satisfaction.

The supplier’s verified status supports baseline confidence in the company profile and factory existence. However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control procedures, textile testing systems, or third-party product certifications. As a result, the quality assurance system cannot be considered fully validated based on the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a strong rating and verified supplier status, but the extremely limited review count and lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection data prevent a higher score. The quality profile is promising but not fully evidenced. Therefore, it fits the range of good basic quality assurance with insufficient customer feedback depth.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for further cooperation, especially for buyers seeking medium-to-large volume nylon or polyamide yarn sourcing.

Shishi Yiming Dyeing And Weaving Co., Ltd. shows strong supplier fundamentals, including large factory scale, a substantial workforce, verified supplier status, 14 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. These factors make the company suitable for buyers that prioritize manufacturing capacity, platform credibility, and delivery reliability.

Suitable customer types include:
- Buyers sourcing nylon or polyamide yarn products
- Importers requiring suppliers with verified factory scale
- Medium-to-large volume purchasers
- Buyers needing customization support, including Full Customization or ODM service

Main risks:
- Customer feedback base is limited, with only 1 review available
- Finished Product Inspection information is not provided
- Detailed factory audit reports, production capacity data, and quality certification information are not available in the provided dataset
- Response time is acceptable at ≤6h but not at the highest service level of ≤1h

Growth potential:
The supplier has strong potential due to its large operating scale, long platform history, and customization capability. If it can provide more transparent quality documentation, product inspection records, and accumulate more verified customer reviews, its procurement attractiveness would improve further.