Shishi Bada Electrical Automation Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shishi Bada Electrical Automation Trading Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Fujian, offering electrical automation-related products such as elevator auxiliary contacts, AC components, contactors, and branded electrical accessories. Based on the provided data, the supplier appears to operate at a relatively small physical scale, with a factory area of over 1,400㎡ and more than 10 staff, but it has supplier verification status, which provides some operational credibility. Its platform profile is stronger than its production scale, supported by 5 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance availability. Commercial performance is moderate, with 50+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.8 store rating and 20+ reviews. The main limitations are limited workforce scale, incomplete information on customization capability, absence of stated Finished Product Inspection data, and a low on-time delivery rate of 72.5%. This supplier is more suitable for small-to-medium buyers seeking low-MOQ electrical components rather than buyers requiring highly stable delivery or large-scale production assurance.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 1,400+㎡
- Employees: 10+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Country/Province: China, Fujian

Elaboration:
The supplier has a documented factory area and employee count, indicating a visible operating base rather than a purely unverified trading profile. However, the scale is relatively small, especially considering the employee count of only 10+ staff. The verified supplier status improves confidence in the existence and basic legitimacy of the business, but the provided data does not indicate large-scale production lines, advanced manufacturing capacity, annual output, machinery quantity, or factory certification details.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates basic production and/or supply capability, supported by a physical site and supplier verification. However, the limited staff size and modest factory area do not support classification as a medium or large-scale stable supply chain. The available data suggests a small supplier with basic operational capacity rather than a high-volume industrial manufacturer.

Final Score: 11 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry labels: “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 72.5%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a relatively solid platform profile, including 5 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance support. These factors provide meaningful platform-level credibility and reduce basic transaction risk. The verified supplier status further strengthens confidence. However, the certification or industry label data is limited to response time and delivery performance; no additional compliance certificates, product certifications, factory audit reports, or quality system certifications are provided.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has several core credibility indicators: Gold Supplier status, multi-year platform history, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. This supports a relatively strong platform credibility score. However, the lack of detailed certification labels or formal compliance documentation prevents it from reaching the highest score range.

Final Score: 17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 50+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 20+

Elaboration:
The supplier has measurable transaction activity over the past six months, showing that it is commercially active on the platform. The 50+ order count indicates a moderate level of buyer engagement, while CN¥67.6K+ transaction value suggests limited-to-medium transaction scale. The 4.8 rating is positive, but the review base of 20+ is not large enough to indicate broad market validation.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows stable but not high-volume business performance. Order count and transaction value provide evidence of real commercial activity, while the rating is favorable. However, the transaction value and review count remain moderate, so the supplier does not qualify for a high-score range associated with strong sales volume, large transaction history, and extensive customer feedback.

Final Score: 14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s stated response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication responsiveness. This is suitable for general inquiry handling, quotation requests, and basic order communication. However, there is no provided evidence that the supplier supports Full Customization, technical customization, private labeling, OEM/ODM service, or engineering support.

Scoring Rationale:
The response time is reasonable, but not at the strongest level of ≤1 hour. Since customization capability is not provided, the service capability cannot be scored as strong. The supplier appears capable of standard communication and basic service handling, but there is insufficient data to confirm advanced service flexibility.

Final Score: 6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 72.5%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 72.5%, which falls within the 70–79% range. This indicates that delivery reliability is a notable weakness compared with suppliers maintaining 90%+ delivery performance. For buyers with strict project timelines, urgent maintenance needs, or production-line dependency, this delivery record may create operational risk.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring framework, a 70–79% on-time delivery rate corresponds to 5–6 points. Given the rate is closer to the lower-middle of this range and significantly below 80%, a conservative score is appropriate. Delivery reliability should be treated as one of the supplier’s main risk factors.

Final Score: 5 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 20+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Supplier verification provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.8, indicating generally favorable customer satisfaction among available reviewers. However, the number of reviews is limited at 20+, which restricts the reliability of the feedback sample. Supplier verification adds some confidence, but the provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, formal quality inspection procedures, product testing standards, or detailed factory verification scope.

Scoring Rationale:
The strong rating supports a reasonable quality and feedback score, but the limited review count and lack of explicit quality assurance systems prevent a higher rating. The supplier has basic customer validation, but the quality control framework is not sufficiently documented for buyers requiring strict inspection or compliance assurance.

Final Score: 14 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 67 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for buyers seeking small-batch or low-MOQ electrical automation components, especially where Trade Assurance and verified supplier status are considered sufficient safeguards. The supplier may fit small-to-medium procurement needs, maintenance replacement sourcing, or trial orders.

Key risks include small company scale, limited employee count, insufficient data on customization capability, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, and a relatively weak on-time delivery rate of 72.5%. Buyers with strict delivery schedules, large-volume requirements, or formal quality compliance needs should conduct additional verification before placing significant orders.

The supplier’s growth potential lies in its 5-year Gold Supplier history, active recent transactions, positive 4.8 rating, and verified supplier status. However, improving delivery reliability and providing clearer quality inspection documentation would be necessary to become a stronger long-term procurement partner.