zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Feiaoda Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

12.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Feiaoda Technology Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based Chinese supplier focused on silicone baby and food-related products, including baby food-grade silicone pacifier feeders, popsicle tray molds, BPA-free infant feeders, and reusable silicone fruit feeders. The company shows a moderate production base with a reported factory area of 3,200+ sqm and 80+ staff, supported by verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is strong, with 13 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and listed operational tags including Finished Product Inspection and 96.4% on-time delivery. Business performance is also solid, with 60+ orders and CN¥2.2M+ transaction value in the past six months, plus a 4.9 store rating. However, the review count is relatively limited at 20+, and Full Customization capability is not explicitly provided. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking silicone baby/food-grade consumer products with low to medium order requirements, platform-backed transaction protection, and reliable delivery performance.

Shenzhen Feiaoda Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 3,200+ sqm
- Employees: 80+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical factory scale and workforce size. A 3,200+ sqm facility with 80+ staff indicates a small-to-medium manufacturing operation rather than a large-scale industrial supplier. The presence of verified supplier status strengthens confidence that the company has passed some form of supplier verification on the platform.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic and stable production capability, with a defined factory area, staff size, and supplier verification. However, the available data does not indicate a large manufacturing base, extensive production lines, advanced factory certifications, or high employee scale. Therefore, it fits best into the “small-to-medium but operationally capable” range rather than the large-scale supply chain category.

Final Score
15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 13 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: Low MOQ for customization, Finished Product Inspection, On-time delivery 96.4%

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform history, with 13 years as an Gold Supplier. Trade Assurance support provides transaction protection, while the listed tags indicate platform-recognized operating capabilities related to customization MOQ, inspection, and delivery performance.

Scoring Rationale
A 13-year Gold Supplier record combined with Trade Assurance represents a strong platform credibility profile. The supplier also has relevant operational tags, including Finished Product Inspection and on-time delivery performance. However, the data does not provide detailed third-party factory audit certificates or external compliance certifications beyond the platform information, so a near-top but not perfect score is appropriate.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 60+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2.2M+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 20+

Elaboration
The supplier has demonstrated recent commercial activity, with more than 60 orders and over CN¥2.2M in transaction value during the past six months. The store rating of 4.9 is strong, suggesting positive buyer satisfaction among recorded reviewers. However, the number of reviews is relatively limited at 20+, which restricts the depth of customer validation.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of transaction value, order count, and high store rating supports a stable business performance assessment. The supplier is not positioned as a very high-volume platform seller based on the available order count, and the review base is not large enough to fully confirm broad market validation. Therefore, the supplier should be scored in the stable mid-to-upper range.

Final Score
16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Customization-related tag: Low MOQ for customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within four hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour. The “Low MOQ for customization” tag suggests some customization flexibility, but the data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability.

Scoring Rationale
Service capability appears functional and commercially usable, especially for buyers needing customization at lower MOQ levels. However, because response time is not within the highest-performance range and Full Customization is not directly confirmed, the score should remain in the normal-to-good range rather than the top tier.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 96.4%

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 96.4% is strong and exceeds the 90% benchmark for the highest scoring category. This indicates reliable fulfillment performance based on the provided platform data.

Scoring Rationale
Since the delivery rate is above 90%, the supplier qualifies for a high delivery performance score. A 96.4% rate suggests strong operational discipline in shipment execution, although the data does not provide further breakdown by product, destination, or order size.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 20+
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier / factory verification: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.9, which supports positive customer feedback. Finished Product Inspection is listed, indicating a quality-control mechanism before shipment. Verified supplier status also adds quality assurance value. However, the review count of 20+ is relatively limited, so the customer feedback sample is not large.

Scoring Rationale
The high store rating and presence of Finished Product Inspection support a favorable quality assessment. Verified supplier status further improves confidence. Nevertheless, the limited number of reviews prevents the supplier from being classified as having extensive customer feedback validation. The score should therefore be strong but below the highest tier.

Final Score
16 / 20

Total Score

82 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order scaling. Shenzhen Feiaoda Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers sourcing silicone baby and food-grade consumer products, especially customers requiring low to medium MOQ, platform transaction protection, and reliable delivery performance.

The supplier is most appropriate for small-to-medium importers, e-commerce sellers, promotional product buyers, and brands testing silicone baby-feeding or food-related product lines. Its main strengths are long platform history, Trade Assurance support, 96.4% on-time delivery, Finished Product Inspection, and stable recent transaction performance.

Key risks include limited review volume, absence of explicit Full Customization confirmation, and insufficient data on external product certifications, international compliance standards, production capacity by item, export markets, or major customer references. Growth potential is positive if the supplier can provide stronger documentation on product compliance, customization capability, and quality-control procedures.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen A-R Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen A-R Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jinchenyu Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jinchenyu Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jiujiu New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jiujiu New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Meiborui (Xianghe) Electronic Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meiborui (Xianghe) Electronic Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Zhanming Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Zhanming Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kaiyuan Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kaiyuan Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Daxin Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Daxin Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Weiran Building Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Weiran Building Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueqing Lovadon Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueqing Lovadon Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou East World Automation Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou East World Automation Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Top Oil Purifier Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Top Oil Purifier Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Haoran Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Haoran Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Glead Kitchen Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Glead Kitchen Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tomark (Xiangyang) International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tomark (Xiangyang) International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Qianfeng Capart Int'L Corp. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Qianfeng Capart Int'L Corp. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Newtop Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Newtop Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Yingxin Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Yingxin Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huiatech Printing Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Huiatech Printing Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Truly Instrument Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Truly Instrument Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruian Suoyin Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruian Suoyin Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Aoj Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Aoj Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Haoyi Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Haoyi Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Jinghong Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Jinghong Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026