zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Jinchenyu Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

12.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Jinchenyu Technology Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 1,700+ m² and 50+ staff. The company is identified as a verified supplier and operates on with 6 years of Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and listed platform tags including Finished Product Inspection, Socially Responsible, Warranty Available, and On-time Delivery 100.0%. Its recent business data shows 20+ orders and CN¥5.2M+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 5.0 store rating and 10+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking a small-to-mid-sized, verified Chinese supplier with strong platform credibility, low MOQ product availability, and documented delivery reliability. However, review volume remains limited, and available data does not include detailed factory audit reports, production capacity figures, export markets, or customer references.

Shenzhen Jinchenyu Technology Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 1,700+ m²
- Employees: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical factory profile, including factory area and employee count. A 1,700+ m² facility with 50+ staff indicates a small-to-mid-sized manufacturing operation rather than a large-scale industrial supplier. The presence of verified supplier status improves confidence that the company has undergone some form of supplier verification, although the specific audit scope and audit body are not provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capacity and verified supplier status, which supports operational credibility. However, its factory size and workforce are moderate, and there is no provided information on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, R&D team, or detailed audit reports. Therefore, it should not be rated as a large-scale stable supply chain, but it is stronger than a minimally documented small supplier.

Final Score
15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty Available, Socially Responsible, Finished Product Inspection, On-time Delivery 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively established platform presence with 6 years of Gold Supplier status. Trade Assurance support provides additional transactional protection for buyers. The listed tags also indicate several compliance and buyer-protection elements, including warranty availability, social responsibility positioning, finished product inspection, and delivery-performance disclosure.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of 6 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and multiple platform credibility tags provides a strong platform trust foundation. However, the data does not include specific third-party management system certifications, product certifications, or detailed factory audit certificates. As a result, the supplier has strong platform credibility but not enough disclosed compliance depth to justify a near-perfect score.

Final Score
17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 20+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥5.2M+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 10+

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded recent commercial activity, with 20+ orders and CN¥5.2M+ in transactions over the past six months. The transaction value is relatively strong compared with the order count, suggesting that the supplier has handled meaningful transaction volume during the period. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the number of reviews is only 10+, which limits the statistical reliability of customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale
The CN¥5.2M+ transaction value supports a favorable business performance assessment, while 20+ orders indicates active but not high-volume order flow. The 5.0 rating is excellent, but the limited review count prevents the score from reaching the highest band. Overall, the supplier shows stable medium-level commercial validation with good transaction value but limited feedback depth.

Final Score
16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Product information includes OEM ODM Customized product type
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication responsiveness for procurement inquiries. The product description references OEM and ODM customization, which suggests customization capability at the product-offering level. However, the dataset does not explicitly confirm Full Customization support as a platform capability, nor does it provide information on design support, sample lead time, engineering team, or customization workflow.

Scoring Rationale
The response time is reasonable but does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour. Customization capability is partially supported by the product description, but Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed. Therefore, the supplier should be assessed as having normal service responsiveness with probable basic customization capability, while avoiding overstatement due to incomplete data.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
- Certification / industry tag also states: On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier’s disclosed on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is the strongest delivery-related metric available in the provided data. This indicates that, based on platform-disclosed performance, the supplier has met delivery commitments for recorded transactions.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% supports a score of 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery-performance band. A perfect score is reasonable based on the data, although the dataset does not provide the number of shipments behind this percentage.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 10+
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory Verification: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is very positive. It also has a Finished Product Inspection tag, indicating that product inspection is part of its disclosed platform profile. Verified supplier status provides additional quality-related reassurance. However, the number of reviews is only 10+, and the dataset does not explicitly state Factory Verification as a separate certification or provide inspection procedures, defect rates, test reports, or quality management system certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs well on visible quality indicators, especially the 5.0 rating and Finished Product Inspection tag. However, the limited number of reviews reduces confidence in the rating’s representativeness. Since Factory Verification is not explicitly confirmed and detailed quality-control documentation is not provided, the supplier fits the “good rating with basic quality assurance” range rather than the highest quality-feedback category.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Shenzhen Jinchenyu Technology Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers seeking a verified Guangdong-based supplier with moderate factory scale, Trade Assurance support, low MOQ availability, OEM/ODM-related product offerings, and strong reported delivery performance.

The supplier is most suitable for small-to-medium procurement programs, trial orders, customized product inquiries, and buyers who value platform-backed transaction protection. It may also be appropriate for buyers who require responsive communication within a few hours and prefer suppliers with documented recent transaction value.

Key risks include limited review volume, insufficient disclosure of detailed factory audit results, no confirmed Full Customization platform data, no stated production capacity, and no provided product certification or quality management certification details. Before larger-volume purchasing, buyers should request factory audit documents, product inspection standards, sample approval records, production capacity confirmation, and clarification of customization capabilities.

Overall, the supplier shows solid growth potential due to its 6-year Gold Supplier history, CN¥5.2M+ recent transaction value, 100.0% on-time delivery rate, and verified supplier status. A phased sourcing approach is recommended: begin with sample or small-batch orders, verify quality consistency, and scale purchasing only after supplier performance is confirmed.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen A-R Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen A-R Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Haoshida Science And Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Haoshida Science And Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ocom Technologies Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ocom Technologies Limited Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Hefei Kaxing Digital Control Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Kaxing Digital Control Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Luxury Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Luxury Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Haorui Hardware Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Haorui Hardware Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueqing Xiaoyuan Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueqing Xiaoyuan Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Koyo Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Koyo Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Yizhihang Power Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Yizhihang Power Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Starway Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Starway Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changsha Top-Auto Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changsha Top-Auto Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Beigain Hardware Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Beigain Hardware Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Carfu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Carfu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Luwei Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Luwei Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Golden Orange Electronics Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Golden Orange Electronics Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Henan Ankang Sanitary Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Ankang Sanitary Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Zhengdong Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Zhengdong Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Luxun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Luxun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ronghang Hardware Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ronghang Hardware Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi City Mayee Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi City Mayee Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yiluhong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yiluhong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Longyang Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Longyang Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026