zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Rongfengyuan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Rongfengyuan Technology Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based tablet PC supplier with a reported factory area of 1,600+ sqm and 30+ staff. The company presents a focused product portfolio around Android tablets, including 10.1-inch and 11-inch tablet PCs, kids tablets, and octa-core Android models, with low MOQs of 1 piece across the listed products. Its profile shows 6 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and platform labels including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service, and warranty availability. Business performance appears moderate, with 20+ orders and CN¥405.6K+ transaction value in the past six months, but the review base is limited at 9 reviews and a 4.4 store rating. The supplier is suitable for small to mid-sized buyers, sample-based sourcing, ODM/customized tablet projects, and buyers requiring flexible MOQ. Key risks relate to limited review volume and modest factory scale.

Shenzhen Rongfengyuan Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 1,600+ sqm
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory location: Guangdong, China

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical manufacturing base with a reported 1,600+ sqm factory area and 30+ employees. This indicates an operating factory structure rather than a purely trading-oriented profile, but the scale remains relatively small compared with large electronics manufacturing operations. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and baseline operating capacity of the company.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic production capability with a real factory footprint, staff base, and supplier verification. However, the factory area and employee count suggest a small-scale or lower mid-scale supplier rather than a large-volume, highly industrialized manufacturer. There is no additional data on production lines, monthly capacity, equipment, or internationally recognized factory certifications, so the score should remain in the small but capable range.

Final Score
13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service available

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively mature platform presence, supported by 6 years of Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance availability. The profile also includes several commercially relevant labels, especially Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, Full Customization, and ODM service. These indicators strengthen platform-level credibility and reduce basic sourcing risk.

Scoring Rationale
A 6-year Gold Supplier history combined with Trade Assurance and verified supplier status provides a strong platform credibility foundation. The available compliance and service labels are reasonably complete for an -based electronics supplier. However, the data does not provide specific third-party management system certifications, product compliance certificates, or detailed audit reports, so the score is strong but not maximum.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month order volume: 20+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥405.6K+
- Store rating: 4.4
- Review count: 9

Elaboration
The supplier has demonstrated recent transaction activity, with 20+ orders and over CN¥405.6K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that buyers are placing orders and that the company has some commercial validation on the platform. However, the number of reviews is low, and the 4.4 rating is acceptable but not outstanding.

Scoring Rationale
The order count and transaction value show active but not high-volume commercial performance. The limited review count reduces confidence in the stability and consistency of buyer satisfaction, while the 4.4 rating suggests generally positive but not top-tier feedback. Based on the available data, this is a moderate business performance profile rather than a high-performing or heavily validated supplier profile.

Final Score
14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available

Elaboration
The supplier reports a response time within three hours, which is commercially acceptable for online B2B communication. The presence of Full Customization and ODM service labels suggests the supplier can support customized tablet projects beyond standard product resale, although no details are provided on customization scope, engineering capability, or development workflow.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has clear service advantages through customization and ODM availability, which are valuable for buyers needing private label, specification adjustments, or project-based tablet sourcing. However, the response time is not within the strongest benchmark of one hour or less, and there is insufficient data on technical support depth, design resources, or after-sales process. Therefore, the service capability is solid but not top-rated.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, which is a strong delivery indicator. This suggests that, based on the available platform data, the company has been able to meet promised shipping timelines for recorded transactions.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 100.0%, it receives the maximum score for this category. The only limitation is that the dataset does not include order complexity, shipment volume distribution, or long-term delivery history beyond the provided performance metric.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.4
- Review count: 9
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
- Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration
The supplier has several quality-related indicators, including Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. These factors suggest that the supplier has some quality assurance mechanisms visible on the platform. However, customer feedback volume is limited, with only 9 reviews, making it difficult to strongly validate consistency across a larger buyer base.

Scoring Rationale
The 4.4 rating is generally favorable, and the presence of Finished Product Inspection is a meaningful quality-support signal. Warranty availability also improves buyer protection. Nevertheless, the low number of reviews limits the reliability of customer feedback analysis, and the data does not include defect rates, inspection reports, return rates, product compliance certifications, or detailed QC procedures. The supplier therefore scores in the good but not highly proven range.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

78 / 100

  • Company Strength: 13 / 20
  • Platform & Compliance Credibility: 18 / 20
  • Business Performance: 14 / 20
  • Service Capability: 8 / 10
  • Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
  • Quality & Customer Feedback: 15 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Shenzhen Rongfengyuan Technology Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers seeking Android tablet PCs with low MOQ, sample orders, ODM service, or customization support. The supplier is most suitable for small to mid-sized importers, e-commerce sellers, private-label buyers, and project buyers who need flexible order quantities rather than very large-scale mass production.

The main strengths are its 6-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, Finished Product Inspection label, and customization/ODM capability. The key risks are the modest factory size, limited staff scale, low review count, and insufficient data on detailed production capacity, product certifications, quality control procedures, and large-volume delivery experience.

Overall, the supplier shows credible platform standing and acceptable commercial performance, with growth potential in customized tablet sourcing. For larger or compliance-sensitive procurement, buyers should request additional factory audit documents, product certification records, QC reports, and pre-shipment inspection confirmation before scaling orders.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Xientaike Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Xientaike Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Anping County Jingzhi Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Jingzhi Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Haizhou Packing Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Haizhou Packing Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Shuangyang Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Shuangyang Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hongtai Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hongtai Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Lvhang Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Lvhang Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Audley Digital Control Equipments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Audley Digital Control Equipments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Anpin Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Anpin Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jieyang Rongcheng District Good Good Wear Shoes Factory Supplier Evaluation
Jieyang Rongcheng District Good Good Wear Shoes Factory Supplier Evaluation
Jilin Province Lu E Niang Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jilin Province Lu E Niang Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shijia Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shijia Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Yizhihang Power Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Yizhihang Power Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Masuma (Guangzhou) International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Masuma (Guangzhou) International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Techgong (Shanghai) International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Techgong (Shanghai) International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xianghua Explosion Proof Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xianghua Explosion Proof Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Dazao Machinery Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Dazao Machinery Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shouguang Aoxin Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shouguang Aoxin Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dratec Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dratec Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Jianna Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Jianna Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Nanshan Porcelain Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Nanshan Porcelain Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026