Shenzhen Yunmi Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Shenzhen Yunmi Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, offering high-value electric scooter-related products such as YUME X11, HAWK Pro, Raptor2, and 60V dual-motor scooter models. Based on the provided data, the company operates with a factory area of 1,800+ m² and 50+ staff, indicating a small-to-mid-sized production setup with basic manufacturing capacity. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 8 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and platform tags including low MOQ customization, 94.4% on-time delivery, and response time within 4 hours. Business activity appears commercially validated, with 100+ orders and CN¥1.4M+ transaction volume in the past six months, alongside a 4.8 store rating and 40+ reviews. This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ sourcing, branded scooter models, and moderate-scale procurement. Key limitations include limited factory scale and insufficient data on formal product inspection systems or detailed customization capabilities.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis:
- Factory area: 1,800+ m²
- Employees: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier/factory audit status: True
- Location: Guangdong, China
Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates a defined physical production base with over 1,800 m² of factory space and more than 50 employees. This indicates that the company has basic manufacturing and operational capacity rather than being only a trading storefront. The verified supplier status further supports a certain level of operational transparency. However, the factory size and staff count do not indicate a large-scale manufacturing operation.
Scoring Rationale:
The company fits the profile of a small-to-mid-sized factory with stable basic production capability. The verified supplier status improves confidence, but the available factory area and staff scale are not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale stable supply chain. Therefore, the score should fall in the middle range rather than the top tier.
Final Score: 14 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier/factory audit: True
- Certification/industry tags: Low MOQ for customization, On-time delivery 94.4%, Response time ≤4h
Elaboration:
The supplier has a relatively mature platform profile. Eight years as a Gold Supplier indicates long-term platform presence, while Trade Assurance provides transaction-level protection for buyers. The verified supplier status further strengthens credibility. The listed platform tags also show operational transparency around delivery and response performance.
Scoring Rationale:
The combination of long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, verified status, and platform performance tags gives this supplier strong credibility. However, the provided data does not include detailed third-party management system certifications or product compliance certifications, so the score should remain slightly below the maximum.
Final Score: 18 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis:
- Past 6-month orders: 100+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥1.4M+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Review count: 40+
Elaboration:
The supplier has clear recent commercial activity, with more than 100 orders and over CN¥1.4M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates active market demand and a measurable transaction history. A 4.8 store rating is positive, while 40+ reviews provide a moderate but not extensive customer feedback base.
Scoring Rationale:
The business performance is stronger than a low-volume supplier due to meaningful order count and transaction value. However, the number of reviews is still moderate, and the data does not show very high-volume sales or exceptionally broad buyer validation. This supports a stable mid-to-high score.
Final Score: 16 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis:
- Response time: ≤4h
- Platform tag: Low MOQ for customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates acceptable communication responsiveness, with a response time within 4 hours. The platform tag suggests support for low MOQ customization, which can be useful for buyers requiring flexible order quantities. However, the provided data does not confirm Full Customization capability, engineering support, design support, private labeling, or other deeper customization services.
Scoring Rationale:
The response speed is reasonable but does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. The low MOQ customization tag is positive, but because Full Customization is not confirmed, the service capability should be assessed as normal rather than highly advanced.
Final Score: 7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 94.4%
Elaboration:
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 94.4% is above the 90% benchmark. This indicates relatively reliable fulfillment performance based on the provided platform data. For procurement teams, this reduces delivery risk compared with suppliers with weaker or unreported delivery records.
Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% falls into the 9–10 point range. Since 94.4% is clearly above the threshold but not perfect, a strong but not maximum score is appropriate.
Final Score: 9 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis:
- Store rating: 4.8
- Review count: 40+
- Verified supplier/factory audit: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
Elaboration:
The supplier has a good store rating of 4.8, indicating generally positive customer feedback. The 40+ reviews provide some validation, though the review base is not large enough to represent extensive market confirmation. Verified supplier status adds some confidence in operational legitimacy, but the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection or a dedicated quality inspection system.
Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows positive customer feedback and basic credibility, but quality assurance data is incomplete. The absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection prevents a higher score. The rating is strong, but the review count and quality-system transparency remain moderate.
Final Score: 15 / 20
Total Score
Total Score: 79 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is recommended with moderate confidence, especially for buyers seeking low-MOQ sourcing of electric scooter products from a supplier with verified platform credibility and recent transaction activity. The supplier is suitable for small-to-medium importers, online retailers, trial-order buyers, and buyers prioritizing Trade Assurance and acceptable delivery reliability.
Main risks include limited factory scale, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, and unconfirmed Full Customization capability. Buyers should request inspection procedures, product compliance documents, warranty terms, and pre-shipment quality control evidence before placing larger orders. Growth potential is present due to 8 years of Gold Supplier history, 100+ recent orders, CN¥1.4M+ recent transaction value, and strong 94.4% on-time delivery performance.
Leave your comment