zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Hangzhou Taoxing Printing Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Hangzhou Taoxing Printing Machinery Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, offering listed printing and paper cutting machinery such as semi-automatic business card equipment, program-controlled paper cutters, hydraulic paper cutting machines, and electric paper strip cutters. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-scale but operationally established supplier, with a factory area of 2,600+㎡, 20+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility and transaction history: it has 18 years as an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and recorded 60+ orders with CN¥1.6M+ transaction value in the past six months. However, the supplier has a relatively limited review base of 8 reviews and an on-time shipment rate of 79.4%, which creates delivery and feedback reliability concerns. Overall, it is better suited for small to medium buyers seeking low-MOQ machinery procurement rather than highly time-sensitive or large-scale production programs.

Hangzhou Taoxing Printing Machinery Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Company: Hangzhou Taoxing Printing Machinery Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Zhejiang, China
  • Factory area: 2,600+㎡
  • Employees: 20+ staff
  • Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True
  • Product scope provided: printing and paper cutting machinery
  • Formal factory certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a defined production site and a stated factory area of more than 2,600 square meters, which indicates a real operating base rather than a purely trading-oriented profile based on the provided information. The workforce size of 20+ staff suggests a relatively small manufacturing organization. This scale may be suitable for standard machinery supply, small-batch orders, and customized or low-MOQ procurement, especially because the listed products have minimum order quantities of 1 piece or 1 set.

However, the available data does not show large-scale production indicators such as high employee count, multi-site operations, annual production capacity, automated production lines, or internationally recognized factory certifications. The “verified supplier” status supports basic credibility, but it does not by itself prove large-scale manufacturing capability.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic production capability with a physical factory, verified supplier status, and a focused machinery product portfolio. However, the relatively small employee base and limited factory area place it closer to a small manufacturing supplier than a large-scale industrial producer. Since formal factory certifications and production capacity data are not provided, the score should remain within the “small but basic production capability” range.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier tenure: 18 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True
  • Certification / platform tags:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • ODM service available
  • Full customization
  • Independent compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s platform credibility is one of its strongest areas. An 18-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence. The availability of Trade Assurance adds a transaction protection mechanism for buyers, which can reduce payment and fulfillment risk compared with suppliers without platform-backed protection.

The supplier also carries several useful operational tags, including warranty availability, finished product inspection, ODM service, and full customization. These tags support its credibility in terms of buyer service and quality-control process visibility. However, the data does not provide independent third-party certifications such as ISO, CE, or other product-specific compliance documentation. Therefore, while the platform credibility is strong, compliance documentation cannot be considered fully proven beyond the listed platform information.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 18 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and multiple platform service/quality tags reflects a mature and credible supplier profile. The only reason not to assign a perfect score is the absence of detailed independent certification data.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 60+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1.6M+
  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Number of reviews: 8

Elaboration

The supplier has measurable recent business activity, with more than 60 orders and over CN¥1.6M in transaction value during the past six months. For machinery products, this transaction value indicates a meaningful level of commercial activity. The store rating of 4.8 is positive and suggests that buyers who left reviews were generally satisfied.

However, the number of reviews is only 8, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. A high score based on a small number of reviews should be interpreted cautiously because it does not provide broad customer feedback coverage. The order volume and transaction amount are stronger evidence than the review count, but the limited review base still prevents classification as a highly validated, high-volume supplier.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable recent trading performance, especially considering the machinery category and the CN¥1.6M+ transaction value. The 60+ orders indicate consistent activity rather than isolated transactions. However, the small number of reviews weakens the depth of market validation. Therefore, the supplier fits best into a stable medium-scale transaction profile rather than a top-tier high-volume performer.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤4h
  • Full customization: Available
  • ODM service: Available
  • Warranty available: Yes
  • Detailed after-sales service process: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier provides a response time of no more than four hours, which is acceptable for international sourcing communication. It also lists full customization and ODM service availability, indicating that it may support buyer-specific requirements beyond standard off-the-shelf products. Warranty availability is also a positive service-related indicator.

That said, the response time is not within the strongest category of ≤1 hour. In addition, the provided data does not include details about engineering support, technical documentation, spare parts availability, installation guidance, training, or after-sales response procedures. For machinery procurement, these service factors can be important, but they cannot be confirmed from the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates solid service capability through acceptable response speed and customization/ODM availability. However, since response time is ≤4h rather than ≤1h, and because detailed after-sales and technical support information is not provided, the score should remain in the upper-middle range rather than the excellent range.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time shipment rate: 79.4%

Elaboration

The on-time shipment rate of 79.4% is a notable risk point. According to the provided scoring framework, a delivery rate between 70% and 79% falls into the 5–6 point range. This indicates that while the supplier does complete shipments, its timeliness performance is not strong enough for buyers with strict delivery schedules.

For machinery procurement, delays may affect installation timelines, production planning, and downstream customer commitments. Since no additional information is provided regarding average lead time, delay reasons, stock availability, or expedited shipping capability, the delivery risk cannot be further mitigated based on the current data.

Scoring Rationale

The 79.4% on-time shipment rate is just below the 80% threshold. This places the supplier at the upper end of the 70–79% scoring band, but still below the level expected from suppliers with reliable delivery execution. The score reflects measurable delivery weakness despite otherwise credible platform and transaction performance.

Final Score

6 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Number of reviews: 8
  • Finished product inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Yes
  • Detailed defect rate, return rate, or inspection reports: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.8, which is a favorable signal. The presence of finished product inspection indicates that the supplier claims to have a quality-check process before shipment. Warranty availability also supports a basic quality assurance framework. Verified supplier status further improves credibility.

However, the review count is low at only 8, which limits the reliability of the rating as a broad customer satisfaction indicator. In addition, the data does not include detailed quality records such as inspection reports, defect rates, product compliance certificates, warranty claim history, or customer complaint trends. Therefore, the quality system appears present at a basic level, but it is not fully validated by extensive customer feedback or detailed documentation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a solid score because it has a high rating, finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. However, the limited number of reviews and lack of detailed quality-performance data prevent a higher score. The quality profile is positive but not yet strongly proven by large-scale customer feedback.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 13 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 6 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 77 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation is recommended.

Hangzhou Taoxing Printing Machinery Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking small to medium-volume procurement of printing and paper cutting machinery, especially when low MOQ purchasing is required. Its 18-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, recent transaction value of CN¥1.6M+, and customization-related tags make it a credible sourcing candidate.

Suitable customer types: - Small and medium distributors of printing or paper processing equipment
- Buyers requiring low-MOQ machinery orders
- Procurement teams that value Trade Assurance protection
- Customers needing customization or ODM service, subject to further technical confirmation

Main risks: - On-time shipment rate is only 79.4%, creating delivery reliability risk
- Review count is limited at 8, reducing feedback confidence
- Factory scale is relatively small with 20+ staff
- Independent certifications and detailed quality records are Insufficient Data

Growth potential: The supplier shows good platform maturity and recent commercial activity. If it improves delivery performance and accumulates more verified customer feedback, its procurement attractiveness could increase further.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Ruian Dapeng Printing Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruian Dapeng Printing Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Lansing Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Lansing Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Nuohua Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Nuohua Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Befitter Machinery & Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Befitter Machinery & Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Caifull Precision Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Caifull Precision Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Danno Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Danno Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Kafan Machinery & Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Kafan Machinery & Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hengtuo Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hengtuo Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhongtai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhongtai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Minghong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Minghong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Licai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Licai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kuaima Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kuaima Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanning Fangda Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanning Fangda Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuanming Printing (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuanming Printing (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jinguan Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jinguan Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shunhong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shunhong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinice Digital Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinice Digital Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jorunns Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jorunns Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huiatech Printing Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Huiatech Printing Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Bioland Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Bioland Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Ningbo Kadeer Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Kadeer Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Poma Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Poma Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yonghe Sports Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yonghe Sports Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Jinkezhi Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Jinkezhi Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Weiao Automotive Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Weiao Automotive Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tenet Iot Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tenet Iot Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Botanical Cube Inc Supplier Evaluation
Botanical Cube Inc Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Daqiaodao Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Daqiaodao Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Win Win Tech. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Win Win Tech. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Zhongsheng Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Zhongsheng Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Forst Filter Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Forst Filter Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ruining Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ruining Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jintong Flnorescent Magnetized Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jintong Flnorescent Magnetized Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sunpeace Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sunpeace Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Noble Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Noble Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Aisikao Refrigeration Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Aisikao Refrigeration Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Weizhong Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Weizhong Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Rongfeng Agricultural Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Rongfeng Agricultural Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Moyu Technology Co., Ltd. Zhuhai Supplier Evaluation
Moyu Technology Co., Ltd. Zhuhai Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Weite Shijia Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Weite Shijia Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026