Tengzhou Toledo Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Supplier Evaluation Report: Tengzhou Toledo Industry And Trade Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary
Tengzhou Toledo Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, offering fiber-related products such as polypropylene fiber, polyacrylonitrile fiber, acrylic staple fiber, and anti-cracking concrete/mortar fiber products. Based on the provided data, the company has an 8,800+㎡ factory area, 50+ staff, and is marked as a verified/audited supplier, indicating a moderate production foundation rather than a large-scale industrial supply chain. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 15 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and customization-related service tags. However, recent commercial performance appears limited, with only 10+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value in the past six months, alongside a small review base of 8 reviews. The supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking flexible MOQ, sample-level purchasing, customized fiber products, or small-to-medium procurement volumes. Key risks include limited recent transaction validation, low review quantity, and only moderate on-time delivery performance.
Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength — 20 Points
Basis
- Company name: Tengzhou Toledo Industry And Trade Co., Ltd.
- Country/region: China, Shandong
- Factory area: 8,800+㎡
- Staff size: 50+ staff
- Verified/audited supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a physical production base of over 8,800 square meters and more than 50 employees. This indicates that the company has established manufacturing premises and a basic operational workforce. The presence of an audited or verified supplier status further supports that the company has some level of factory credibility and operational visibility.
However, based strictly on the provided data, the company does not demonstrate very large-scale production capacity. There is no information on annual output, number of production lines, equipment details, warehouse capacity, export volume, or major customer references. Therefore, while the factory size and staff count support a stable production foundation, the data does not justify classification as a large-scale supply chain operator.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier fits best into the category of a medium-sized stable factory. The 8,800+㎡ facility is meaningful for industrial production, and 50+ employees suggest sufficient staffing for regular operations. The verified/audited supplier status strengthens confidence in its legitimacy. However, the absence of detailed capacity indicators prevents a higher score within the 18–20 range.
Final Score
15 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 15 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry tags: Warranty available, ODM service available, Full customization, Minor customization
- Verified/audited supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility. A 15-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance availability provides buyers with an additional transactional protection mechanism. The listed service tags, including warranty availability, ODM service, full customization, and minor customization, indicate that the supplier has a relatively complete platform service profile.
The provided data also identifies the supplier as verified/audited, which improves compliance credibility. However, no specific third-party product certifications, ISO certificates, chemical compliance certificates, or industry-specific test reports are provided. Therefore, while platform credibility is strong, technical compliance documentation cannot be fully assessed.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, and multiple platform-backed service labels. These are strong signals of platform reliability. The lack of detailed certification documents prevents a perfect score, but the overall platform and compliance credibility is clearly above average.
Final Score
19 / 20
3. Business Performance — 20 Points
Basis
- Past 6-month orders: 10+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Number of reviews: 8
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded more than 10 orders and over CN¥67.6K in transaction value during the past six months. This confirms that the store has active transactions, but the scale is relatively limited. The store rating of 4.7 is positive, suggesting acceptable buyer satisfaction among existing reviewers.
However, the review count is only 8, which is a small sample size. This limits the reliability of the rating as a broad indicator of commercial performance. The order volume and transaction amount also do not indicate high market activity or strong recent purchasing momentum.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows real but modest business activity. A 4.7 rating is favorable, but the low review count and limited recent transaction volume restrict commercial validation. Based on the available figures, this supplier should be viewed as commercially active but not strongly proven by high-volume platform sales.
Final Score
12 / 20
4. Service Capability — 10 Points
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Service tags: Full customization, Minor customization, ODM service available, Warranty available
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within two hours indicates a reasonable level of communication efficiency. This is not the fastest response category, as the highest scoring tier requires response within one hour, but it is still acceptable for normal procurement communication.
The presence of Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service tags indicates that the supplier offers flexible service options. This can be useful for buyers requiring specification adjustments, private-label development, or product adaptation. However, no details are provided regarding engineering team size, customization lead time, sample development process, or technical support structure.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates solid service capability through acceptable response speed and customization availability. The response time is slightly slower than the top-tier standard, and the available data does not provide deeper evidence of advanced service infrastructure. Therefore, the supplier deserves a strong but not maximum score.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 72.7%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 72.7%. According to the scoring framework, a rate between 70% and 79% falls into the 5–6 point range. This indicates that delivery reliability is moderate and may require attention from buyers, especially for time-sensitive procurement.
A 72.7% on-time shipment rate means there is a notable possibility of delayed dispatch. The data does not provide reasons for delays, average lead time, product-specific delivery performance, or whether delays are related to customization orders. Therefore, the risk cannot be further explained beyond the provided percentage.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier meets the 70–79% delivery range, which supports a moderate score. While it is not critically poor, the performance is clearly below the 90%+ benchmark expected for highly reliable suppliers. Buyers with strict project schedules should manage delivery timelines carefully.
Final Score
6 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points
Basis
- Store rating: 4.7
- Number of reviews: 8
- Verified/audited supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Supplier marked as verified/audited
Elaboration
The supplier has a store rating of 4.7, which is generally positive. This suggests that existing buyers have provided favorable feedback. However, the review count is only 8, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. A small number of reviews cannot fully represent long-term product consistency or quality stability across larger order volumes.
The supplier is marked as verified/audited, which adds credibility to its quality management foundation. However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Finished Product Inspection. There is also no information regarding product test reports, batch inspection procedures, raw material control, defect rate, or after-sales claim handling.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a good rating and verified/audited status, which supports a positive quality assessment. However, the limited review base and lack of explicit Finished Product Inspection data prevent a high score. Quality confidence is acceptable but not strongly validated by extensive customer feedback or documented inspection systems.
Final Score
14 / 20
Total Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 15 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 19 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 12 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 8 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 6 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 14 / 20 |
| Total Score | 74 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended
Tengzhou Toledo Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking fiber products with low MOQ flexibility, customization options, and moderate-volume sourcing. Its strongest advantages are long-term platform presence, Trade Assurance support, verified/audited supplier status, and customization-related service capabilities.
However, buyers should manage several risks carefully. The supplier’s recent transaction scale is limited, with only 10+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months. The review count is also low, meaning customer feedback is not yet broad enough to fully validate long-term quality consistency. Delivery performance is another key risk, as the on-time delivery rate is only 72.7%.
For procurement use, this supplier is more appropriate for sample orders, trial orders, customized small-to-medium batch purchases, or buyers who can tolerate moderate delivery uncertainty. For large-volume, time-critical, or highly quality-sensitive projects, buyers should request additional documentation, such as production capacity details, quality inspection procedures, finished product inspection confirmation, and delivery lead-time commitments before placing major orders.
Leave your comment