Xiamen Cashino Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Xiamen Cashino Trade Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Fujian, with a reported factory area of 3,500+ m² and 110+ staff. The company appears to have a moderate operational scale and basic supplier verification support, making it more suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume procurement rather than highly complex large-scale industrial sourcing. Its listed products are mainly Cashino-branded scanner, Android portable Bluetooth, and related device models, with low MOQ at 1 piece, which may support sample purchasing or flexible order testing. On platform credibility, the supplier shows relatively strong indicators, including 6 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and platform tags for response time and on-time delivery. Business performance is also supported by 200+ orders and CN¥4.5M+ transaction value over the past six months. However, customer review volume is limited at 10+, and there is no provided data on Full Customization or Finished Product Inspection. Overall, this supplier is suitable for verified trial orders, flexible procurement, and mid-level sourcing programs.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Fujian, China
- Factory area: 3,500+ m²
- Employees: 110+ staff
- Audited / verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical operating base with a factory area above 3,500 m² and more than 110 employees. This indicates a functioning production or supply organization with a moderate staffing base. The presence of supplier verification adds credibility to the company’s operational profile, although the provided data does not include detailed production lines, monthly capacity, equipment lists, or factory audit reports.
Scoring Rationale
The company does not appear to be a very large-scale manufacturer based on the provided factory size and employee count, but it has enough staff and facility scale to support stable small-to-medium procurement needs. The verified supplier status strengthens confidence in its basic operational legitimacy. However, because no detailed production capacity or advanced factory certification data is provided, it should not be scored in the top range for large-scale supply-chain strength.
Final Score
15 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / platform labels: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 98.3%”
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates solid platform credibility through a 6-year Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance support. These indicators suggest an established platform presence and a procurement mechanism that can provide buyers with transaction protection. The platform labels also show measurable service and delivery performance. However, the provided labels are operational indicators rather than formal product or industry certifications.
Scoring Rationale
A 6-year Gold Supplier record combined with Trade Assurance and verified supplier status provides a relatively complete platform credibility profile. The supplier has stronger credibility than a basic or newly listed supplier. The score is not maximized because the provided data does not include specific compliance certificates, product certifications, or detailed factory audit documentation beyond supplier verification.
Final Score
18 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 200+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥4.5M+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 10+
Elaboration
The supplier has measurable commercial activity, with more than 200 orders and CN¥4.5M+ transaction value over the past six months. This indicates active buyer engagement and a meaningful transaction history. The store rating of 4.7 is positive, although the review base of 10+ is relatively limited compared with suppliers that have large volumes of public customer feedback.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows strong recent transaction performance in both order count and transaction value, which supports commercial reliability. The 4.7 rating is favorable, but the low review count limits the depth of customer validation. Therefore, the supplier fits the upper-middle range rather than the highest score band, as business performance is commercially proven but not supported by extensive review volume.
Final Score
17 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours suggests relatively efficient communication and acceptable responsiveness for online procurement. This is useful for quotation handling, sample confirmation, and order coordination. However, no data is provided regarding Full Customization, OEM/ODM capability, design support, engineering communication, or after-sales service structure.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates good response speed, but the response time does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. In addition, customization capability cannot be confirmed from the provided data. As a result, the supplier can be considered service-capable for standard inquiries and basic order communication, but its ability to support complex customization remains unverified.
Final Score
7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 98.3%
Elaboration
The supplier reports an on-time delivery rate of 98.3%, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. This exceeds the 90% threshold for the highest scoring range and suggests that the supplier has effective order fulfillment discipline on the platform.
Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the provided on-time delivery rate, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery performance band. A 98.3% rate indicates reliable shipment execution and reduces delivery-related procurement risk. No negative delivery data is provided.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 10+
- Verified supplier / factory verification: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.7, which supports general buyer satisfaction. The verified supplier status provides an additional layer of quality-related credibility, as it indicates some level of platform or supplier verification. However, the review volume is only 10+, which limits the statistical strength of customer feedback. There is also no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, product quality certifications, defect rate data, or third-party inspection records.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows acceptable quality confidence through its rating and verification status, but the available customer feedback sample is relatively small. The absence of Finished Product Inspection data prevents a higher score because quality assurance procedures cannot be fully confirmed. The supplier therefore fits the “good but not fully validated” quality range.
Final Score
15 / 20
Total Score
82 / 100
- Company Strength: 15 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 18 / 20
- Business Performance: 17 / 20
- Service Capability: 7 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 15 / 20
Procurement Recommendation
Xiamen Cashino Trade Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers seeking flexible MOQ purchasing, sample orders, and small-to-medium volume sourcing of the listed Cashino device products. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, active recent transaction performance, and excellent reported on-time delivery.
The main risks are the limited customer review volume, lack of provided Finished Product Inspection data, and insufficient information on Full Customization capability. Before placing larger or customized orders, buyers should request product inspection procedures, warranty terms, customization capability details, and any available factory or product certification documents.
Overall, the supplier has good growth potential as a verified, commercially active supplier with stable delivery performance, but larger procurement programs should proceed after additional quality and customization verification.
Leave your comment