zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Yangzhou Yilikim New Materials Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Yangzhou Yilikim New Materials Trading Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, offering specialty fiber-related products including para aramid and UHMWPE fiber/yarn items, with listed MOQs ranging from 20 kg to 500 kg depending on product type. Based on the provided data, the supplier shows a relatively solid operational foundation, supported by a reported factory area of over 22,000 m², more than 100 staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is strong, with 9 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and multiple service/quality-related labels including Finished Product Inspection and ODM service availability. Commercial performance appears moderate: the supplier has CN¥1.9M+ in transaction value over the past six months but only 10+ orders and 2 reviews, which limits buyer-side validation. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking specialized fiber materials with moderate-to-large procurement needs, while buyers should further verify product specifications, production capacity, and quality consistency before large-scale commitments.

Yangzhou Yilikim New Materials Trading Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Company: Yangzhou Yilikim New Materials Trading Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Jiangsu, China
  • Factory area: 22,000+ m²
  • Employees: 100+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area of more than 22,000 m² and a workforce exceeding 100 employees. These figures indicate a meaningful physical and personnel base, suggesting the supplier is not a very small-scale operation. The verified supplier status further strengthens its company profile because it indicates that some level of platform-side or third-party verification has been completed. However, the provided data does not include details such as annual production capacity, number of production lines, equipment lists, ownership of the factory, export history, or internationally recognized factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The company appears to have a stable mid-sized operating foundation. The factory area is relatively substantial, and the staff count supports basic-to-moderate production and service capability. Verified supplier status adds credibility, but the lack of detailed production capacity, manufacturing equipment information, or named factory certifications prevents it from being classified as a large-scale, fully validated supply chain. Therefore, the score is positioned in the upper range for a medium stable factory, but not at the highest level.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification / industry labels:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • ODM service available
  • Minor customization
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 9 years, which is a relatively long platform history. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with a basic transactional protection mechanism on the platform. The presence of labels such as Finished Product Inspection, Warranty Available, ODM Service Available, and Minor Customization indicates a more complete platform profile than suppliers with only basic storefront information. The verified supplier status further supports platform credibility.

Scoring Rationale

This supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility due to its long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and multiple service/quality-related labels. The 9-year Gold Supplier duration is especially positive because it suggests long-term platform continuity. However, the provided data does not show specific compliance certifications, such as ISO, OEKO-TEX, REACH, or other industry certifications. Since the available compliance evidence is platform-based rather than externally certification-based, the score is strong but not perfect.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 10+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1.9M+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Number of reviews: 2

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 10 orders in the past six months, with a transaction value exceeding CN¥1.9M. This indicates that although the number of orders is not high, the average transaction value may be relatively meaningful based on the available data. The store rating of 4.9 is strong, but the review count is only 2, which limits the reliability of the rating as a broad indicator of customer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale

The transaction amount of CN¥1.9M+ demonstrates some level of commercial activity and buyer acceptance. However, the order count of 10+ is moderate to low, and the review base is very limited. A high rating with only 2 reviews cannot provide strong statistical confidence. As a result, the supplier’s commercial performance is better than an unproven supplier but does not yet demonstrate high-volume, broadly validated market performance. The appropriate rating is within the stable medium range.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Response time: ≤2 hours
  • ODM service available
  • Minor customization available
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported response time of ≤2 hours indicates a reasonably responsive communication process. The availability of ODM service and minor customization suggests some capability to support product adaptation or development requests. However, the data does not confirm Full Customization capability, which is a key scoring factor in this dimension. No additional information is provided regarding sales team size, technical support team, sample lead time, language capability, or after-sales process.

Scoring Rationale

The response speed is acceptable and supports efficient sourcing communication. ODM and minor customization labels are positive, especially for buyers requiring some degree of product adjustment. However, because Full Customization is not confirmed and service capability data is limited, the supplier cannot be rated in the highest band. The score reflects normal-to-good service capability with partial customization evidence.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. This is a strong delivery performance indicator and suggests that existing platform-recorded shipments were dispatched according to committed timelines. However, the data does not provide the number of shipments behind this metric, nor does it specify average lead time, logistics options, export documentation capability, or performance during peak seasons.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score in this dimension. The only limitation is that the underlying shipment volume is not provided, but the available metric itself is excellent.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Number of reviews: 2
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Warranty available
  • Factory Verification: Insufficient Data beyond verified supplier status

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is positive. It also carries a Finished Product Inspection label, indicating that some level of final product checking is available. Warranty availability provides an additional quality-related support signal. Verified supplier status also contributes to confidence. However, the number of customer reviews is only 2, which is too limited to strongly validate long-term quality consistency or customer satisfaction across different orders and buyers.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has several positive quality indicators, including Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, verified supplier status, and a high rating. Nevertheless, the very low review count restricts the strength of the customer feedback evidence. The data supports a conclusion of basic-to-good quality assurance, but not enough to classify the supplier as having fully proven, high-volume customer-validated quality performance. Therefore, the score falls in the good but not top-tier range.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 15 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 82 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Yangzhou Yilikim New Materials Trading Co., Ltd. is a relatively credible supplier for buyers sourcing para aramid and UHMWPE fiber/yarn products, especially where platform protection, verified supplier status, and stable communication are important. The supplier is suitable for small-to-medium trial orders, technical sample evaluation, and moderate-volume procurement where buyers can conduct their own specification verification.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers sourcing specialty fibers such as para aramid or UHMWPE fiber/yarn
- Importers requiring Trade Assurance-supported transactions
- Buyers needing ODM or minor customization support
- Customers willing to start with sample or pilot orders before scaling

Main risk points:
- Only 2 customer reviews, limiting customer feedback reliability
- Full Customization capability is not confirmed
- No provided data on production capacity, equipment, factory certifications, or international compliance certifications
- Factory Verification beyond verified supplier status is Insufficient Data

Growth potential:
The supplier shows good platform maturity, a long history, strong on-time dispatch performance, and a meaningful transaction value over the past six months. If future data confirms stronger customer feedback, broader certification coverage, and more transparent production capacity, the supplier could become a stronger candidate for larger-scale procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Foshan Dougbuild Materials Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Dougbuild Materials Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Huifengquan Building Materials Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Huifengquan Building Materials Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Linyuanwai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Linyuanwai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Haoheng New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Haoheng New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Bafangle New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Bafangle New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Jiaobao New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Jiaobao New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sankin New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sankin New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kemiton New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kemiton New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiangyang Fengshen New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiangyang Fengshen New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shanling New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shanling New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Bright New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Bright New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Xinming New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Xinming New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jinbao New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jinbao New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Lanxinxi New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Lanxinxi New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Zhanyu New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Zhanyu New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Botai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Botai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huilong New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huilong New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Mingyu New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Mingyu New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingyun Xinyang New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingyun Xinyang New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jarmoo Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jarmoo Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shenzhen Oriental Green Source Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Oriental Green Source Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Metallics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Metallics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Purly Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Purly Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Akira Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Akira Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Jiangsen Artificial Grass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Jiangsen Artificial Grass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changsha Xinkang Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changsha Xinkang Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Whale Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Whale Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Homewell New Tech (Tianjin) Decoration Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Homewell New Tech (Tianjin) Decoration Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yasidan Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yasidan Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Shuaiwei Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Shuaiwei Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Quanju Ozone Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Quanju Ozone Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Qiyigifts Metal & Plastic Factory Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Qiyigifts Metal & Plastic Factory Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Garfield Home Furnishing Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Garfield Home Furnishing Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Jiaheng Hardware Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Jiaheng Hardware Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sheng Zhu Daily Pigments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sheng Zhu Daily Pigments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuji Hiest Magtech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuji Hiest Magtech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Xinming New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Xinming New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Puzhu Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Puzhu Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Hongjie International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Hongjie International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qinhuangdao Baifeng Food Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Qinhuangdao Baifeng Food Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026