zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Zhejiang Huilong New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Zhejiang Huilong New Materials Co., Ltd.

Zhejiang Huilong New Materials Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Zhejiang Huilong New Materials Co., Ltd. is a China-based polyester yarn supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of over 30,000㎡ and more than 510 staff. The company shows strong production-scale indicators and is marked as a verified supplier. Its product portfolio provided in the data focuses on polyester yarn products including DTY, FDY, microfiber polyester yarn, and B-grade DTY, with MOQs ranging from 10 kg to 2,000 kg depending on product type. On -related platform credibility, the supplier has a strong profile with 19 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance support. However, recent business performance appears moderate to limited, with 9 orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value over the past six months, plus only 4 customer reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking an established polyester yarn manufacturer, but procurement should include sample testing, quality confirmation, and delivery-risk management before scaling orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company name: Zhejiang Huilong New Materials Co., Ltd.
  • Country: China
  • Province: Zhejiang
  • Factory area: 30,000+㎡
  • Employees: 510+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product scope in provided data: Polyester DTY, FDY, microfiber polyester yarn, B-grade DTY

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a relatively large physical operating scale based on the reported factory area of over 30,000㎡ and workforce of more than 510 employees. These indicators suggest that the company is not a small trading-only entity based on the data provided, but has meaningful manufacturing or production-support capacity. The verified supplier status further supports the credibility of its basic company profile.

The listed products are concentrated in polyester yarn categories, including DTY and FDY specifications. This indicates a focused product direction within synthetic textile materials rather than a highly fragmented product catalog. The combination of factory size, employee count, and verified supplier status provides a strong basis for evaluating the supplier as a large-scale industrial supplier.

Scoring Rationale

The company fits the upper range of the Company Strength category because the reported factory area and staff size are both substantial. The verified supplier status also strengthens confidence in the supplier’s operational presence. However, the data does not provide additional factory audit details, production line numbers, annual capacity, equipment list, or third-party factory certification documents. Therefore, while the supplier appears to have strong production fundamentals, a perfect score is not assigned due to the absence of deeper factory audit or capacity documentation.

Final Score

19 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier history: 19 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry tags provided:
  • Response time ≤5h
  • On-time delivery 83.3%

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 19-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence and continuity. Trade Assurance support is also important for procurement risk control, as it offers a structured transaction mechanism on the platform. The supplier is additionally marked as verified, which reinforces its baseline credibility.

However, the provided certification or industry tag information is limited. The available tags mainly relate to response time and on-time delivery performance. There is no provided evidence of additional product certifications, factory management certifications, chemical compliance, textile-specific certifications, or quality system certifications. Therefore, while platform credibility is strong, the compliance profile cannot be considered fully comprehensive based only on the available data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a high score because it combines long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These are strong platform-based trust indicators. The only reason the score is not at the absolute maximum is that the certification/tag information is not comprehensive beyond service and delivery-related platform indicators. No additional compliance certificates were provided in the dataset.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 9
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥270.4K+
  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Number of reviews: 4

Elaboration

The supplier shows some recent commercial activity, with 9 orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value in the past six months. The transaction value indicates that the supplier has completed measurable business through the platform. The store rating of 4.6 is generally positive, suggesting that existing buyers have provided favorable feedback.

However, the number of orders and reviews is limited. Only 9 orders over six months suggests that current visible platform transaction frequency is not high. The review count of 4 is also too small to provide a statistically strong view of buyer satisfaction. While the transaction amount is not negligible, the relatively low order count and limited review base reduce the strength of commercial validation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier does not fall into the high-performance category because the recent order volume and review count are limited. The CN¥270.4K+ transaction value provides some evidence of business activity, and the 4.6 rating is positive, but the low number of orders and reviews prevents a higher score. The supplier is commercially active but not strongly validated by large-scale recent platform transactions based on the data provided.

Final Score

12 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤5h
  • Platform tag: Response time ≤5h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data
  • Other service capability details: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 5 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. This is a positive service indicator, especially for international sourcing, where timely responses are important during quotation, sampling, order confirmation, and after-sales coordination.

However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization. There is also no information on design support, technical consultation, OEM/ODM service, packaging customization, sampling lead time, dedicated account management, or multilingual support. Therefore, the service capability assessment must remain conservative and focused only on the confirmed response-time data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a normal and acceptable response speed, but it does not meet the highest standard of response within one hour. More importantly, customization capability is not provided in the data, so strong service capability cannot be confirmed. The score reflects basic communication reliability but limited evidence of advanced service or customization support.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 83.3%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 83.3%. This places the supplier within the 80%–89% performance range. The figure indicates that the supplier has a majority of orders delivered on time, but there is still a meaningful proportion of orders that may experience delay.

For procurement planning, this delivery level may be acceptable for buyers with flexible lead times or buffer inventory. However, for buyers operating under strict production schedules, seasonal launches, or just-in-time inventory systems, the current on-time delivery rate should be treated as a risk factor that requires order tracking and delivery milestone control.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. Since 83.3% is in the lower-middle part of this range, the supplier receives a solid but not high delivery score. The supplier demonstrates acceptable delivery capability, but not a best-in-class delivery record.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Number of reviews: 4
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: True / verified supplier status provided
  • Product categories: Polyester yarn products including DTY, FDY, microfiber polyester yarn, and B-grade DTY

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.6, which is a positive customer feedback indicator. However, the number of reviews is only 4, which limits the reliability of the rating as a quality benchmark. A high score based on customer feedback usually requires both strong ratings and a larger review base.

The supplier is marked as verified, which supports baseline confidence in the company’s legitimacy and operating profile. However, there is no provided data confirming Finished Product Inspection, third-party quality inspection, textile quality certification, internal quality control procedures, or product test reports. Because the supplier offers polyester yarn products, product consistency, denier accuracy, color consistency, tensile performance, and defect control may be important procurement factors, but none of these quality metrics are provided in the dataset and therefore cannot be assumed.

Scoring Rationale

The quality score is moderate. The 4.6 rating is favorable, and the verified supplier status provides some assurance. However, the very small number of reviews and lack of Finished Product Inspection data restrict confidence in consistent quality performance. The supplier has basic visible quality credibility, but stronger evidence would be needed before assigning a higher score.

Final Score

13 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 19 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 12 / 20
Service Capability 6 / 10
Delivery Performance 8 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 13 / 20
Total Score 76 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Zhejiang Huilong New Materials Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking a large-scale polyester yarn supplier with strong platform credibility, long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. The company is more appropriate for buyers sourcing polyester DTY, FDY, microfiber polyester yarn, or related yarn products where factory scale and supplier continuity are important.

However, cooperation should proceed with controlled procurement steps. Key risks include limited recent order volume, only 4 customer reviews, lack of provided Finished Product Inspection data, and an on-time delivery rate of 83.3%, which is acceptable but not excellent. Buyers should request samples, confirm specifications, clarify inspection standards, and use Trade Assurance for initial transactions.

The supplier’s growth potential is supported by its factory scale, long platform history, and focused polyester yarn product range. If it can improve visible customer feedback, delivery reliability, and provide stronger quality inspection documentation, its procurement attractiveness would increase further.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Zhejiang Zhanyu New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Zhanyu New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Botai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Botai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ouzhi New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ouzhi New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Oron New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Oron New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Linyuanwai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Linyuanwai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Haoheng New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Haoheng New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Bafangle New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Bafangle New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Jiaobao New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Jiaobao New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sankin New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sankin New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kemiton New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kemiton New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiangyang Fengshen New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiangyang Fengshen New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shanling New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shanling New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Bright New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Bright New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Xinming New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Xinming New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jinbao New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jinbao New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Lanxinxi New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Lanxinxi New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Mingyu New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Mingyu New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingyun Xinyang New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingyun Xinyang New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nuoxin New Materials (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nuoxin New Materials (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Benming New Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Benming New Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Hebei Nuohua Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Nuohua Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Hongtai Package Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Hongtai Package Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Ankang Sanitary Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Ankang Sanitary Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Water World Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Water World Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jinguang Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jinguang Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yilutong International Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yilutong International Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Hengxing Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Hengxing Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ls Vision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ls Vision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Rainwood Biotech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Rainwood Biotech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Jacket Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Jacket Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Canxin Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Canxin Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Billions Imp.& Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Billions Imp.& Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Opled Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Opled Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Sakura Thread Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Sakura Thread Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Pm  Mold Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Pm Mold Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Qunkun Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Qunkun Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiangyang Fengshen New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiangyang Fengshen New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pegatec Abrasives Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pegatec Abrasives Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mesky Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mesky Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026