Zhongshan Yadi Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Zhongshan Yadi Import And Export Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based supplier with a reported factory area of 11,000+ ㎡ and 180+ staff, indicating a mid-sized production organization with established operating capacity. The company is listed as a verified supplier and offers products mainly in customized metal medals, pins, and related metal items, with low MOQ levels ranging from 10 to 25 pieces across the provided product listings. Platform credibility is supported by 4 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and labels including warranty availability, low MOQ for customization, and finished product inspection. Commercial performance is strong, with 500+ orders and CN¥2M+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 100+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ customized metal promotional products with relatively strong platform-backed transaction confidence. Key limitations are the lack of explicit Full Customization confirmation and limited detail on formal factory certifications beyond verification.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis:
- Factory area: 11,000+ ㎡
- Employees: 180+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Guangdong, China
Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates a measurable physical production base, with more than 11,000 ㎡ of factory area and over 180 employees. This suggests it has more than basic workshop-level capacity and can likely support recurring order flows within its product category. The verified supplier status adds confidence that the company’s operational presence has been checked at platform level.
Scoring Rationale:
The company fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory rather than a very large-scale supply chain operator. The factory area and workforce are solid, and verified supplier status strengthens reliability. However, the data does not provide additional details such as annual production capacity, number of production lines, or formal factory management certifications, so a top-tier score is not justified.
Final Score: 16 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, Low MOQ for customization, Finished product inspection
Elaboration:
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. The 4-year Gold Supplier history indicates a reasonable operating record on the platform, while Trade Assurance provides buyers with transaction protection. The listed labels also support basic compliance and buyer-service credibility.
Scoring Rationale:
Core platform trust elements are present, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, and relevant service/inspection labels. The 4-year duration is credible but not exceptionally long, and the data does not include broader third-party certifications or detailed compliance documents. Therefore, the supplier ranks strongly but not at the highest credibility tier.
Final Score: 17 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis:
- Past 6 months orders: 500+
- Past 6 months transaction value: CN¥2M+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 100+
Elaboration:
The supplier shows strong recent commercial activity, with more than 500 orders and over CN¥2M in transaction value during the past six months. A 4.9 rating with more than 100 reviews indicates that the commercial performance is not only active but also supported by customer feedback volume.
Scoring Rationale:
The combination of high order count, meaningful transaction value, strong store rating, and 100+ reviews provides solid commercial validation. These figures indicate that the supplier is actively transacting and has market acceptance on the platform. The score is high, though not perfect, because the data does not include repeat purchase rate, buyer distribution, dispute rate, or detailed order-size breakdown.
Final Score: 19 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Label: Low MOQ for customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of within two hours suggests acceptable communication efficiency for online sourcing. The presence of a low-MOQ customization label supports suitability for customized small-batch orders. However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability.
Scoring Rationale:
Service capability appears solid due to fast response and customization-related labeling. However, the scoring criteria gives the highest range to suppliers responding within one hour and supporting strong customization. Since response time is ≤2h rather than ≤1h, and Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed, the supplier should be scored in the normal-to-good range rather than the top tier.
Final Score: 7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 96.3%
Elaboration:
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is above 90%, which indicates strong delivery discipline based on the provided platform metric. This level is favorable for buyers who need predictable fulfillment timing.
Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 96.3%, the supplier demonstrates strong delivery reliability. No additional delivery data such as average lead time or logistics performance is provided, but the available metric supports a high score.
Final Score: 10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis:
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 100+
- Finished product inspection: Listed
- Factory verification / verified supplier: True
Elaboration:
The supplier has a high customer rating and a meaningful number of reviews, indicating positive buyer feedback at platform level. The finished product inspection label suggests that some level of quality control exists before shipment. Verified supplier status further supports baseline quality and operational credibility.
Scoring Rationale:
The quality profile is strong because it combines high rating, review volume, finished product inspection, and supplier verification. This supports confidence in product consistency and buyer satisfaction. However, the data does not provide detailed inspection standards, defect rates, quality certifications, or audit reports, so a perfect score would not be appropriate.
Final Score: 18 / 20
Total Score
87 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is recommended for buyers seeking low-MOQ customized metal medals, pins, and similar promotional metal products. The supplier is especially suitable for small to mid-sized importers, promotional product distributors, event merchandise buyers, and buyers requiring platform-backed transaction protection through Trade Assurance.
Main risks include insufficient data on Full Customization capability, lack of detailed factory certification information, and absence of disclosed production capacity or quality defect metrics. Growth potential is positive, supported by strong recent transaction performance, high store rating, verified supplier status, and a 96.3% on-time delivery rate. For larger or technically demanding orders, buyers should request samples, confirm customization scope, review inspection procedures, and verify production timelines before placing bulk orders.
Leave your comment