zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Zhuhai National Resources & Jingjie Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Zhuhai National Resources & Jingjie Printing Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with reported factory scale of 50,000+ m² and 510+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a relatively large and established production-oriented supplier for compatible ink bottle products, supported by Gold Supplier status for 6 years, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and platform tags including finished product inspection, warranty availability, social responsibility, and minor customization. Its recent commercial activity shows 30+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, with a strong 4.9 store rating but only 10+ reviews, meaning business validation is positive but not yet broad. The supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ compatible ink products from a verified China-based factory with reliable delivery performance. However, buyers requiring extensive customization or large-scale proven international transaction history should conduct further due diligence.

Zhuhai National Resources & Jingjie Printing Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
The supplier reports a factory area of 50,000+ m², 510+ staff, and verified supplier status.

Elaboration:
The reported factory size and workforce indicate a substantial manufacturing base rather than a small trading operation. A 50,000+ m² facility and 510+ employees suggest the company has meaningful production infrastructure and staffing capacity to support recurring procurement demand.

Scoring Rationale:
The combination of large factory area, sizable workforce, and verified supplier status supports a high score. While no additional factory audit certificate details are provided beyond the verified supplier indication, the available data is strong enough to classify the supplier as a large-scale and stable supply-chain participant.

Final Score: 19 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
The company is a 6-year Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and carries tags including warranty available, socially responsible, finished product inspection, and minor customization.

Elaboration:
Six years as a Gold Supplier provides a meaningful platform history, and Trade Assurance improves transaction security for buyers. The listed certification and capability tags also show a relatively complete platform credibility profile.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has the core credibility indicators expected from a reliable supplier: Gold Supplier status, multi-year platform presence, Trade Assurance, and relevant operational tags. However, the data does not provide detailed third-party certification documents or specific factory audit reports, so the score is strong but not perfect.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
Past six-month performance includes 30+ orders, CN¥67.6K+ transaction value, a 4.9 store rating, and 10+ reviews.

Elaboration:
The supplier has demonstrated recent transaction activity and maintains a high store rating. However, the order volume and transaction value are moderate rather than high, and the review base is relatively limited.

Scoring Rationale:
The 4.9 rating is a positive commercial signal, but 30+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ over six months indicate modest verified transaction scale. The limited number of reviews reduces the strength of customer validation, preventing a high-tier business performance score.

Final Score: 15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
The provided response time is ≤2h. The platform tag shows minor customization, but no Full Customization data is provided.

Elaboration:
A response time within two hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. The supplier offers some level of customization, but the available data only confirms minor customization, not full customization.

Scoring Rationale:
The response speed is good, but the absence of Full Customization data limits the service capability assessment. The supplier appears capable of standard buyer communication and basic customization support, but not enough evidence is available to classify it as a strong customization partner.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate.

Elaboration:
A 100.0% on-time delivery rate is a strong indicator of delivery reliability based on the provided platform data. This supports confidence in order fulfillment timeliness.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, delivery performance above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
The supplier has a 4.9 store rating, 10+ reviews, finished product inspection tag, verified supplier status, and warranty available tag.

Elaboration:
The high rating and presence of finished product inspection are positive quality signals. Warranty availability also suggests some post-sale support mechanism. However, the review count is limited, so the customer feedback base is not broad enough to fully validate long-term quality consistency.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has good quality-related indicators, especially the 4.9 rating and finished product inspection tag. Still, the limited review volume means customer feedback is not extensive. Therefore, the supplier fits the “good rating with basic quality assurance” range rather than the highest tier.

Final Score: 16 / 20

Total Score

85 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended, especially for buyers sourcing compatible ink bottle products with low MOQ requirements and preference for verified suppliers with Trade Assurance. The supplier is suitable for small to medium-sized distributors, online sellers, and buyers seeking stable China-based factory supply with strong delivery performance.

Main risks include limited review volume, moderate recent transaction value, and insufficient data on Full Customization or detailed third-party factory certifications. Growth potential is positive due to the supplier’s large reported factory scale, 6-year Gold Supplier history, 100.0% on-time delivery rate, and existing quality-related platform tags. For larger-volume procurement, buyers should request product samples, inspection documentation, and confirmation of customization capability before placing bulk orders.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Zhuhai National Resources & Jingjie Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai National Resources & Jingjie Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Huanhua Resources Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Huanhua Resources Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huiatech Printing Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Huiatech Printing Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Zywell Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Zywell Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Teamsung Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Teamsung Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Boyeezon Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Boyeezon Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Enlite Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Enlite Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Morning Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Morning Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Yinzhi Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Yinzhi Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Meding Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Meding Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Moyu Technology Co., Ltd. Zhuhai Supplier Evaluation
Moyu Technology Co., Ltd. Zhuhai Supplier Evaluation
Puremind Technology Co., Ltd. Zhuhai Supplier Evaluation
Puremind Technology Co., Ltd. Zhuhai Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Baecheng Jingjie Clothing Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Baecheng Jingjie Clothing Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hainan Hongbao Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hainan Hongbao Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Juncheng Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Juncheng Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Hitek Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Hitek Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Ninestar Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Ninestar Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Huain Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Huain Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Taichuan Cloud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Taichuan Cloud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Yuxun Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Yuxun Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Weifang Shufukang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Shufukang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Biojoint Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Biojoint Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Davosa Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Davosa Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Menjie New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Menjie New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changshu Xingyan Interlining Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changshu Xingyan Interlining Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bogoodwill Industrial Co., Limited. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bogoodwill Industrial Co., Limited. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Angyihao Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Angyihao Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qiankun Environmental Protection Joint Stock Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qiankun Environmental Protection Joint Stock Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qinglai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qinglai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Opled Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Opled Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ruikexin Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ruikexin Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kelrosa Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kelrosa Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chucai Innovation Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chucai Innovation Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Foccred International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Foccred International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Color Powder Coating Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Color Powder Coating Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Muyol Hair International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Muyol Hair International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fengyu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fengyu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Qinqin Holdings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Qinqin Holdings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Xingye Shengda Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Xingye Shengda Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Shuangyuan Iron-Printing & Tin-Making Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Shuangyuan Iron-Printing & Tin-Making Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026