Anhui Qianshan Chuangxian Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Anhui Qianshan Chuangxian Industrial Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Anhui, with a reported factory area of over 16,000㎡ and more than 90 staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to have a moderate manufacturing base and is identified as a verified supplier. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 18 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and compliance-related labels including “Finished product inspection,” “Socially responsible,” “Warranty available,” and “OEM for well-known brands.”

However, recent commercial performance is limited: only 10 orders and CN¥6.7K+ transaction value in the past six months, with a store rating of 4.6 based on only 2 reviews. The major operational concern is delivery reliability, with an on-time shipment rate of only 42.9%. This supplier may be suitable for buyers prioritizing platform credibility, small MOQ sourcing, or preliminary supplier development, but it requires caution for time-sensitive or large-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory location: Anhui, China
• Factory area: 16,000+㎡
• Employees: 90+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The company has a reported factory size of over 16,000㎡, which indicates a meaningful physical production footprint. The workforce of over 90 staff suggests that the supplier has an established operating team rather than being a purely trading-oriented entity. The verified supplier status also provides a basic level of external validation regarding the company’s existence and operating capacity.

However, the data does not provide detailed production capacity, number of production lines, monthly output, equipment list, or specific factory audit reports. Therefore, while the company demonstrates a solid manufacturing base, the available information is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale, highly transparent manufacturing operation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory. The factory area is relatively substantial, and the staff count supports basic to moderate production capability. The verified supplier status further strengthens confidence in its operational legitimacy. However, the absence of detailed production scale data, equipment information, and factory audit documentation prevents a top-tier score.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 18 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / industry labels:
• Warranty available
• Socially responsible
• OEM for well-known brands
• Finished product inspection
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong platform credibility. An 18-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance availability adds a transactional protection mechanism for buyers. The presence of labels such as “Finished product inspection,” “Socially responsible,” and “Warranty available” further improves the supplier’s compliance and risk-management profile.

The label “OEM for well-known brands” is present in the data; however, no specific brand names or supporting documents are provided. Therefore, this point should be treated as a platform label rather than independently verified customer evidence.

Scoring Rationale

This dimension is one of the supplier’s strongest areas. The combination of long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple compliance-related labels indicates a mature platform profile. The only reason the score is not perfect is that detailed factory audit reports, specific certification documents, or customer references are not provided in the dataset.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 10
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥6.7K+
• Store rating: 4.6
• Number of reviews: 2

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded recent commercial activity, but the scale is limited. Ten orders over six months and CN¥6.7K+ transaction value indicate that the store has some transaction history, but it does not demonstrate strong recent market demand or high-volume buyer validation.

The store rating of 4.6 is positive, but it is based on only 2 reviews. This small review base limits the reliability of the rating as a performance indicator. The data does not include repeat buyer rate, major customer types, export markets, or order fulfillment size, so broader commercial strength cannot be fully assessed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has some proven business activity, but the transaction volume and order count are relatively low. The 4.6 rating is favorable, but the extremely small number of reviews weakens the confidence level. Therefore, the business performance is assessed as low-to-moderate rather than strong.

Final Score

11 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
• Product information includes customized rubber band-related listings, but no explicit platform-level “Full Customization” service label is provided.

Elaboration

The reported response time of within 2 hours is acceptable and suggests that the supplier is reasonably responsive to buyer inquiries. This supports basic communication efficiency, especially for early-stage quotation and product discussion.

However, the data does not explicitly confirm whether the supplier supports “Full Customization” as a service capability. Although one listed product refers to “Customized Rubber Band Manufacturer Direct Sale,” this alone is not sufficient to confirm structured full customization services, such as design development, packaging customization, tooling support, or private-label service.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives a moderate score due to its acceptable response time. However, because Full Customization support is not clearly confirmed, the service capability cannot be rated at the highest level. The current data supports basic responsiveness but not advanced service capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time shipment rate: 42.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time shipment rate is significantly below the 70% threshold. A 42.9% rate indicates a major delivery reliability concern based strictly on the provided data. This is especially important for buyers with fixed replenishment schedules, seasonal demand, promotional deadlines, or strict delivery windows.

The data does not provide reasons for late shipment, order complexity, logistics method, or whether delays were caused by production or transportation factors. Therefore, the root cause cannot be determined. However, from a procurement risk perspective, the reported on-time shipment percentage must be treated as a material operational weakness.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate below 70% should receive below 5 points. At 42.9%, the supplier demonstrates weak delivery performance. This dimension materially lowers the overall procurement confidence.

Final Score

3 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.6
• Number of reviews: 2
• Finished product inspection: Present
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.6, but the review base is very limited, with only 2 reviews. This means the rating cannot be considered highly representative of consistent customer satisfaction.

On the quality-control side, the “Finished product inspection” label is a positive indicator. It suggests that the supplier has some form of final inspection process before shipment. The verified supplier status also adds baseline credibility. However, the provided data does not include defect rates, quality certificates, inspection reports, product testing results, or detailed quality management system information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic quality assurance indicators, including Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. The rating is good, but the limited review count restricts confidence in customer feedback reliability. As a result, the supplier scores above average but below the level expected for suppliers with extensive reviews and comprehensive quality documentation.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation is recommended, with strict delivery and quality controls.

Anhui Qianshan Chuangxian Industrial Co., Ltd. shows strong platform credibility, long operating history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and a moderate factory base. These factors make it a potentially viable supplier for buyers seeking rubber band-related products, small MOQ orders, supplier sampling, or early-stage sourcing evaluation.

However, buyers should pay close attention to two major risks. First, the recent business volume is relatively low, with only 10 orders and CN¥6.7K+ transaction value in the past six months. Second, the on-time shipment rate of 42.9% is a significant delivery risk. This supplier is not ideal for urgent, seasonal, or strict timeline-driven procurement unless delivery terms are clearly controlled.

Suitable customer types include small to medium buyers, trial-order buyers, and purchasers who value platform credibility and low MOQ flexibility. Before scaling orders, buyers should request production lead time confirmation, pre-shipment inspection, written delivery commitments, and preferably use Trade Assurance for transaction protection. The supplier’s growth potential exists due to its long platform history and verified production base, but operational reliability—especially delivery performance—requires improvement.