zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Anhui Three Six Seven Travel Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

13.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Anhui Three Six Seven Travel Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Anhui, positioned in the student backpack, school bag, and travel backpack segment. The available data indicates a verified supplier with a factory area of 1,200+㎡ and 100+ staff, suggesting a small-to-medium production base with established operational capacity. On , the company shows strong platform credibility through 8 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and certification/industry tags including “Socially responsible,” “Low MOQ for customization,” and “OEM for well-known brands.” Business performance is relatively solid, with 200+ orders and CN¥4.6M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.6 store rating and 40+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking low-to-mid priced backpacks with flexible MOQ options. Key limitations include insufficient data on finished product inspection, detailed quality systems, production capacity, and full customization scope.

Anhui Three Six Seven Travel Products Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 1,200+㎡
- Employees: 100+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Anhui, China

Elaboration:
The supplier has a documented factory footprint and workforce, indicating that it is not merely a trading storefront with no visible production base. A 1,200+㎡ facility and 100+ staff suggest basic to moderate manufacturing capability, suitable for backpack and school bag production. The verified supplier status strengthens confidence in the company’s operational existence and basic factory legitimacy.

Scoring Rationale:
The company does not appear to be a large-scale manufacturing group based on the available factory size, but the staff count and verified supplier status support a stable small-to-medium production profile. Since detailed production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, or audit certificates are not provided, the score should not reach the large-scale supplier range.

Final Score: 15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry tags: “Socially responsible,” “Low MOQ for customization,” “OEM for well-known brands”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a relatively mature presence, with 8 years of Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance support. These indicators provide meaningful platform-level credibility. The listed tags also suggest some compliance and commercial capability signals, although detailed certificates, audit documents, or third-party compliance reports are not provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale:
An 8-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status represent a strong platform credibility profile. However, because the data does not include specific factory audit reports, compliance certificates, or detailed certification validity, the score is slightly below the highest range.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 200+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥4.6M+
- Store rating: 4.6
- Reviews: 40+

Elaboration:
The supplier has demonstrated recent transaction activity with more than 200 orders and over CN¥4.6M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates active market demand and commercial validation on the platform. The 4.6 rating is positive, while 40+ reviews provide some customer feedback base, though not a very large review volume.

Scoring Rationale:
The order volume and transaction amount are strong for a backpack supplier and show stable business activity. The store rating is good but not exceptional, and the review count is moderate rather than extensive. Overall, the supplier demonstrates solid business performance, but not enough evidence to assign the maximum score.

Final Score: 17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: ≤1h
- Low MOQ for customization tag: Present
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of one hour or less indicates strong communication responsiveness, which is important for sourcing, sampling, quotation adjustments, and order coordination. The “Low MOQ for customization” tag suggests some customization support, but the dataset does not confirm Full Customization capability or define the scope of customization services.

Scoring Rationale:
Fast response time is a clear strength. However, because Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed and only low-MOQ customization is indicated, the supplier should be scored as having good but not fully proven service capability.

Final Score: 8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 94.9%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s 94.9% on-time delivery rate is above the 90% threshold, indicating strong delivery reliability based on the provided platform data. This is a positive indicator for buyers managing seasonal school bag orders, promotional campaigns, or scheduled retail replenishment.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, a delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. At 94.9%, the supplier shows strong delivery performance, though not perfect, so a high but not maximum score is appropriate.

Final Score: 9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.6
- Reviews: 40+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a favorable 4.6 store rating and 40+ reviews, showing generally positive customer feedback. Factory verification adds credibility to the supplier’s quality and operational profile. However, there is no explicit data confirming Finished Product Inspection, detailed QC procedures, defect rate, inspection reports, or quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The rating and review base are positive, and factory verification supports a basic quality assurance profile. However, the lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection and limited review volume prevent the supplier from reaching the highest quality score range. The quality profile is acceptable but not fully documented.

Final Score: 15 / 20

Total Score

82 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order validation. Anhui Three Six Seven Travel Products Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers sourcing school backpacks, student bags, promotional backpacks, and low-to-mid priced travel bag products, especially where flexible MOQ and responsive communication are important.

The main risks are insufficient data on finished product inspection, detailed quality control systems, full customization capability, and production capacity. Buyers should request samples, confirm customization scope, verify inspection procedures, and clarify lead times before placing larger orders.

Overall, the supplier shows good platform credibility, solid recent transaction performance, strong delivery reliability, and moderate manufacturing strength. Its growth potential is supported by active sales performance and flexible MOQ positioning, but larger-scale cooperation should depend on further quality and capacity verification.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Guangzhou Three Color Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Three Color Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henry Wang Travel Mug Manufactory Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Henry Wang Travel Mug Manufactory Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Three Iron-Printing & Tin-Making Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Three Iron-Printing & Tin-Making Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Warmfire Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Warmfire Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kuaima Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kuaima Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Yanzhifang Foods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Yanzhifang Foods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zhongtian Petrochemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zhongtian Petrochemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Xuanwuyan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Xuanwuyan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Ocan Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Ocan Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Koyo Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Koyo Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Mingzhen Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Mingzhen Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Fiberyard Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Fiberyard Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Taihua Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Taihua Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Lezet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Lezet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Koodsun Technology  Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Koodsun Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Fulaier E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Fulaier E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Shuncha Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Shuncha Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Ankai Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Ankai Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Tongshun Metalwork Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Tongshun Metalwork Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Agrok Netting Cooperative (Wudi) Supplier Evaluation
Agrok Netting Cooperative (Wudi) Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shenzhen Siliclab Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Siliclab Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhuopin High-Tech Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhuopin High-Tech Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Vatti Glass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Vatti Glass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fu Zhou Sheng Leaf Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fu Zhou Sheng Leaf Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Longen Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Longen Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Blue Elephant Cnc Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Blue Elephant Cnc Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Green Pedel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Green Pedel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Xinyang Decorative Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Xinyang Decorative Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yifantai Titanium Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yifantai Titanium Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Bestwin Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Bestwin Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jushu Food Co.. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jushu Food Co.. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Jianxinsheng Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Jianxinsheng Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinhua Hongsheng Cultural And Creative Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinhua Hongsheng Cultural And Creative Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changyi Baiyi Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changyi Baiyi Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanyang Dongyi Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanyang Dongyi Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hongshengde Masterbatch New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hongshengde Masterbatch New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Winson Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Winson Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lixin Adhesive Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lixin Adhesive Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Wanyi Sculpture Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Wanyi Sculpture Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lai Si Te Electric Appliance Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lai Si Te Electric Appliance Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026