Baoying Yiliyuan Rope And Net Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Baoying Yiliyuan Rope And Net Co., Ltd. is a China-based rope and net supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of 11,000+ m² and 30+ staff. The company appears to have a verified supplier status and offers multiple rope-related products, including polypropylene rope, jute rope, hemp rope, UV-resistant three-strand rope, and polyethylene rope. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 10 years as an Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance availability. However, recent business performance is modest, with 10 orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months. The store rating is high at 5.0, but the review base is limited to 6 reviews. Delivery performance is acceptable but not top-tier, with an on-time delivery rate of 87.5%. This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking verified, mid-scale rope suppliers with platform-backed transaction protection, especially for low-to-medium volume procurement. Larger buyers should further verify capacity, customization ability, and inspection processes before scaling cooperation.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Jiangsu, China
- Factory area: 11,000+ m²
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a clearly stated production site and a factory area exceeding 11,000 m², which indicates a meaningful physical production base. The employee count of 30+ staff suggests the company is not a large-scale labor-intensive manufacturer, but it does have a basic operational team. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and operating condition of the company.

Scoring Rationale:
The factory area is relatively solid, but the employee scale is limited. This suggests the supplier has moderate production capacity rather than a large-scale industrial supply chain. The verified supplier status supports reliability, but there is insufficient data on production lines, annual output, machinery, or third-party factory audit details. Therefore, the company fits best into the mid-sized stable supplier range, but not the top tier.

Final Score: 15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier history: 10 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤11h”, “On-time delivery 87.5%”
- Specific product or factory certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier has a strong platform history, with 10 years as a Gold Supplier and support for Trade Assurance. These are important indicators for platform credibility and transactional protection. The verified supplier status further improves trustworthiness. However, the available certification labels are operational performance tags rather than formal industry, product, or quality management certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
A 10-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status provide strong platform-based credibility. The main limitation is the lack of disclosed formal certifications or complete compliance documentation. As a result, the supplier demonstrates high platform trust but incomplete compliance depth.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 10
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 6

Elaboration:
The supplier has recent transaction activity, but the order count and transaction value are relatively modest. A 5.0 store rating is positive, yet the number of reviews is only 6, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. The data shows commercial activity, but not enough to confirm high-volume or highly validated market performance.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has proven recent transactions, but the business scale remains low to moderate. The perfect rating is favorable, but the small review base reduces confidence. Compared with suppliers showing large order volumes and higher transaction values, this supplier’s commercial validation is still limited.

Final Score: 13 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤11h
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency beyond response time: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of ≤11 hours indicates acceptable responsiveness, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour. No data is provided regarding full customization, design support, private labeling, packaging customization, or dedicated account service.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows normal communication responsiveness but lacks evidence of strong customization capability. Since Full Customization is not confirmed, the service capability should be rated conservatively. The available data supports basic service capability, but not advanced buyer support.

Final Score: 6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 87.5%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 87.5% falls within the 80–89% range. This indicates generally acceptable delivery performance, though it is below the 90%+ level expected from top delivery performers.

Scoring Rationale:
An 87.5% on-time delivery rate suggests that most orders are shipped on schedule, but there remains some delivery risk. For buyers with strict lead-time requirements, this should be monitored closely, especially for repeated or larger-volume orders.

Final Score: 8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 6
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, which is positive, but the limited number of reviews weakens the reliability of this quality signal. Factory verification supports supplier credibility, but there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, quality management certification, inspection reports, or structured QC procedures.

Scoring Rationale:
The high rating and verified status indicate a favorable quality impression, but the small review count and missing inspection data prevent a higher score. The supplier appears to have basic quality credibility, but the quality assurance system is not sufficiently documented.

Final Score: 14 / 20

Total Score

74 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with moderate caution. Baoying Yiliyuan Rope And Net Co., Ltd. is suitable for small-to-medium buyers seeking rope products from a verified Chinese supplier with Trade Assurance and a long Gold Supplier history. The main strengths are platform credibility, verified supplier status, clear factory scale, and acceptable delivery performance.

Key risks include limited recent order volume, low review count, unclear customization capability, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or formal quality certifications. For larger buyers or long-term procurement programs, it is recommended to request samples, confirm production capacity, verify QC procedures, and clarify customization and inspection capabilities before placing high-volume orders. The supplier has growth potential if it can improve delivery consistency, expand transaction volume, and provide stronger quality documentation.