Shenzhen Anbichang Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Anbichang Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. is a China-based packaging materials supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 2,700+㎡ and 20+ staff. The company appears positioned as a small-to-medium-scale supplier focused on packaging-related products such as tape dispensers, carton sealing tape, handheld adhesive tools, and BOPP packing glue. Its strongest indicators are platform credibility and delivery performance: it has 13 years as an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, is marked as a verified supplier, and reports a 98.3% on-time delivery rate. Business performance is also moderate, with 100+ orders and CN¥1.4M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.8 store rating from 40+ reviews. However, available data does not confirm Full Customization capability, Finished Product Inspection, or specific factory/quality certifications beyond supplier verification. This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking stable packaging products with low MOQ flexibility and verified platform transaction protection.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 2,700+㎡
- Employees: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Country/Province: China, Guangdong

Elaboration:
The supplier has a clearly stated physical factory footprint and employee base, indicating an operating manufacturing or supply facility rather than a purely trading-only profile based on the provided data. A 2,700+㎡ factory area suggests basic production or warehousing capacity, while 20+ staff indicates a relatively lean organization. The verified supplier status adds some credibility to its operational presence, but the provided data does not include production lines, monthly output, equipment lists, or detailed factory audit certificates.

Scoring Rationale:
The company shows evidence of real operational capacity and supplier verification, but its staff size is relatively small and the available data does not demonstrate large-scale production capability. It fits better into the “small but with basic production capability” category, with some uplift due to verified supplier status and defined factory area.

Final Score: 13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 13 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification/industry labels: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 98.3%”

Elaboration:
The supplier has a long platform history, with 13 years as a Gold Supplier, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance support provides transactional protection for buyers, and verified supplier status further strengthens trust. However, the provided certification/industry labels mainly relate to response time and delivery performance; no independent product certifications, management system certifications, or detailed compliance documents are provided.

Scoring Rationale:
The long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and supplier verification form a strong platform credibility foundation. The score is high, but not perfect, because the certification label set is not comprehensive and does not include detailed factory certification or product compliance documentation.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 100+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1.4M+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 40+

Elaboration:
The supplier has visible recent transaction activity, with more than 100 orders and transaction value exceeding CN¥1.4M over the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has active buyer demand and a certain level of commercial validation. The 4.8 store rating is positive, while 40+ reviews provide some customer feedback base, though the review volume is not large enough to be considered extensive.

Scoring Rationale:
Business performance appears stable and commercially proven, but the order and review volumes are moderate rather than very high. The transaction value is meaningful for this supplier profile, yet the data does not support classifying it as a top-volume or large-scale transaction performer.

Final Score: 16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of ≤2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency and supports normal buyer interaction. Product titles include some custom-related wording, but the provided service capability data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization. Therefore, customization strength cannot be fully assessed.

Scoring Rationale:
The response speed is good, but it does not meet the ≤1 hour benchmark for the highest score range. Since Full Customization is not confirmed, the service capability should be rated as solid but not strongly differentiated.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 98.3%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a 98.3% on-time delivery rate, which is above the 90% threshold for the highest score range. This indicates strong fulfillment reliability based on the available platform data.

Scoring Rationale:
With an on-time delivery rate well above 90%, the supplier meets the top-tier delivery performance benchmark. No negative delivery indicators are provided.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 40+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The 4.8 store rating suggests generally positive customer satisfaction, and 40+ reviews provide a moderate feedback base. Supplier verification supports basic credibility, but the available data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection or provide detailed quality control procedures. No product certifications, inspection reports, defect rates, or quality audit documents are included.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates good customer feedback and basic verification, but the quality assurance system is not fully evidenced. The absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection and detailed quality documentation prevents a top-tier quality score.

Final Score: 16 / 20

Total Score

80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with standard procurement controls. Shenzhen Anbichang Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking packaging tapes, tape dispensers, and related packaging products with low MOQ flexibility, Trade Assurance protection, stable platform history, and strong delivery reliability. The supplier is especially suitable for small-to-medium buyers or trial orders where verified platform credibility and responsive communication are important.

Key risks include limited evidence of large-scale production capacity, a relatively small staff size, insufficient data on Full Customization, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or detailed quality certifications. Growth potential exists due to its 13-year Gold Supplier history, CN¥1.4M+ recent transaction value, 100+ recent orders, and strong 98.3% on-time delivery rate. For larger-volume or quality-sensitive procurement, buyers should request factory audit documents, inspection procedures, sample validation, and clear customization capability confirmation before scaling orders.