zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Tongcheng Chuangmei Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

12.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Tongcheng Chuangmei Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. is a China-based packaging materials supplier located in Anhui, with a reported factory area of 7,600+ sqm and 120+ staff. The supplier focuses on breast milk storage bag-related products, including temperature-sensing discoloration bags, clear freezer and fridge bags, standing breast milk storage bags, and BPA-free disposable breast milk storage bags. Its product listings show low unit price ranges and MOQs from 3,300 pieces to 30,000 pieces, indicating suitability for volume-oriented packaging procurement.

The supplier has Gold Supplier status for 4 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier. Business performance data shows 40+ orders and CN¥405.6K+ transaction value in the past six months, with a 5.0 store rating from 10+ reviews. However, the on-time delivery rate is 75.9%, which is a key operational risk. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking cost-sensitive breast milk storage bag packaging with moderate order validation, while delivery reliability requires close management.

Tongcheng Chuangmei Packaging Materials Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Country/Region: China, Anhui Province.
  • Factory area: 7,600+ sqm.
  • Employees: 120+ staff.
  • Verified supplier: True.
  • Product scope provided: breast milk storage bag-related packaging products.

Elaboration

The supplier has a clearly reported factory footprint and workforce size, which supports a basic-to-medium manufacturing capability assessment. A factory area of 7,600+ sqm and 120+ employees suggests the company is not a micro-scale trading-only operation based on the provided data. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of a validated operating entity.

The listed product range is concentrated around breast milk storage bags and related freezer/fridge packaging formats. This indicates specialization within a defined flexible packaging or storage bag segment, rather than a broad but unclear product catalog.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has meaningful factory area, over 100 staff, and verified supplier status, which supports a stable production foundation. However, the available data does not include annual production capacity, production lines, machinery details, export volume, or major factory certifications beyond verified supplier status. Therefore, it should be rated as a medium-sized stable factory rather than a large-scale supply chain leader.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True.
  • Gold Supplier duration: 4 years.
  • Trade Assurance: True.
  • Verified supplier: True.
  • Certification/industry tags: Warranty available, Socially responsible, Low MOQ for customization.

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. Four years as a Gold Supplier provides a moderate operating history on , while Trade Assurance gives buyers a platform-supported transaction protection mechanism. Verified supplier status strengthens platform-level confidence.

The listed tags add some compliance and service-related signals, including warranty availability and social responsibility. However, these tags are not equivalent to formal product safety certifications, factory audit reports, ISO certifications, food-contact compliance, or medical/infant product-specific certifications. No such formal certificates are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. The 4-year Gold Supplier history is positive but not long-term enough to reach the highest credibility band. Certification depth is also limited because the provided tags are platform or service labels rather than detailed third-party compliance certificates.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 40+.
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥405.6K+.
  • Store rating: 5.0.
  • Reviews: 10+.

Elaboration

The supplier shows recent transaction activity with 40+ orders and CN¥405.6K+ in transaction value over the past six months. This indicates that buyers have placed orders recently and that the supplier has some commercial validation on the platform.

The 5.0 store rating is strong, but the review count is only 10+, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. The transaction value is meaningful but not high enough to classify the supplier as a top-volume platform performer based only on the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates stable but moderate business performance. The recent order count and transaction amount support a positive commercial track record, while the perfect store rating improves confidence. However, the relatively small number of reviews means customer feedback depth remains limited, and the order volume does not indicate very high market traction.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h.
  • Customization-related tag: Low MOQ for customization.
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data.

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤3 hours is acceptable for international B2B communication, though it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. The platform tag “Low MOQ for customization” suggests some customization support, particularly for lower minimum order quantities.

However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability. There is also no information about design support, sample lead time, dedicated account management, engineering support, or multilingual communication ability.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier appears to offer reasonable service responsiveness and some level of customization support, but the absence of confirmed Full Customization limits the score. A ≤3h response time is commercially usable but not best-in-class.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 75.9%.

Elaboration

The supplier’s delivery performance is the weakest quantified area in the provided data. A 75.9% on-time delivery rate means nearly one-quarter of orders may not have shipped on time, based on the reported platform metric.

For buyers with strict retail launch schedules, seasonal demand windows, or time-sensitive replenishment cycles, this delivery performance could create planning risk. It does not necessarily disqualify the supplier, but it requires stronger order follow-up, confirmed production schedules, and possibly buffer time in procurement planning.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 70% and 79% falls into the 5–6 point range. At 75.9%, the supplier fits the middle of this band. The score reflects a clear operational weakness compared with suppliers above 90%.

Final Score

6 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 5.0.
  • Reviews: 10+.
  • Verified supplier: True.
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data.
  • Factory Verification: True, based on verified supplier status provided.

Elaboration

The 5.0 store rating is a strong positive quality and customer satisfaction signal. However, the review count of 10+ is relatively limited, so the score should not be interpreted as broadly validated across a large buyer base.

The supplier has verified supplier status, which supports baseline credibility. However, the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, specific quality-control procedures, product testing standards, food-contact material compliance, BPA-related certification documentation, or third-party inspection records. Since the product category relates to breast milk storage, quality assurance documentation would be especially important for procurement due diligence, but such documentation is not provided here.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives credit for a perfect store rating and verified supplier status. However, limited review volume and missing Finished Product Inspection data prevent a higher score. The quality profile is positive but not fully substantiated by detailed inspection or certification evidence.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

76 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for buyers seeking cost-sensitive breast milk storage bag packaging from a medium-sized verified Chinese supplier with moderate platform transaction history.

This supplier is most suitable for: - Small to mid-sized buyers testing breast milk storage bag products. - Buyers that can accept MOQs from 3,300 pieces to 30,000 pieces depending on SKU. - Buyers prioritizing competitive unit pricing and basic customization flexibility. - Buyers able to manage delivery schedules with buffer time.

Main risks: - On-time delivery rate is only 75.9%, which is below strong supplier performance standards. - Review count is limited at 10+, despite the 5.0 rating. - Finished Product Inspection is not confirmed. - Formal product compliance certifications are not provided in the available data. - Full Customization capability is not explicitly confirmed.

Growth potential: The supplier has a solid factory base, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and recent transaction activity. If it improves delivery reliability and provides stronger quality documentation, such as inspection procedures or relevant product compliance records, it could become a stronger candidate for repeat procurement and larger-volume sourcing programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Tongcheng Jinlong Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongcheng Jinlong Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuehong Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuehong Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fafaliang Packaging Materials (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fafaliang Packaging Materials (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anqing Decoration Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anqing Decoration Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yukang Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yukang Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qianxun Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qianxun Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dingjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dingjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuyun Packaging (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuyun Packaging (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gongying Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gongying Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xiangnian Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xiangnian Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Datianxia Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Datianxia Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Poma Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Poma Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xingkaihua Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xingkaihua Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenghong (Shenzhen) Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenghong (Shenzhen) Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongxiang Jinqi Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongxiang Jinqi Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Tongxin Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Tongxin Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Qingdao Doowin Rubber And Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Doowin Rubber And Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fs Circuit (Shenzhen) Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Fs Circuit (Shenzhen) Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Espeon New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Espeon New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou C&L Auto Accessories Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou C&L Auto Accessories Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Xintao Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Xintao Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shunde Changsheng Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shunde Changsheng Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kenly Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kenly Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinxiang Hexie Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinxiang Hexie Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Behi Auto Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Behi Auto Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Dytd Foods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Dytd Foods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Ruigang Heavy Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Ruigang Heavy Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Tanlong Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Tanlong Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Guansu Building Materials Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Guansu Building Materials Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Yuanquan Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Yuanquan Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Paishun Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Paishun Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Loyalshine Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Loyalshine Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aiifar Electronic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aiifar Electronic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gaoya Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gaoya Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Enping Yanqiqi Daily Necessities Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Enping Yanqiqi Daily Necessities Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pujiang County Xiaoyan Handicraft Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pujiang County Xiaoyan Handicraft Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026