zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Yiwu Jiaqing Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

13.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Yiwu Jiaqing Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, offering customized acrylic standees, anime character figures, transparent acrylic display products, and related customized acrylic items. The supplier shows basic platform credibility through Gold Supplier status for 2 years, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. Its product listings indicate low minimum order quantities of 50–100 pieces, which may be suitable for small-batch customization buyers, anime merchandise sellers, promotional product buyers, or trial-order procurement teams.

However, several important operational indicators are limited or weak. Factory area and employee count are not provided, making it difficult to assess production scale. Business performance is moderate, with 20+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, but the store rating is only 3.9 with 8 reviews. Delivery performance is a major concern, with an on-time delivery rate of 66.7%, below the standard expected for reliable supply chain execution. Overall, this supplier may be considered for low-risk trial orders, but not yet for time-sensitive or large-scale procurement.

Yiwu Jiaqing Packaging Materials Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Company location: Zhejiang, China
  • Factory area: Insufficient Data
  • Employee count: Insufficient Data
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Listed products focus on customized acrylic standees and acrylic character-related items

Elaboration

The supplier appears to operate in the customized acrylic display and character merchandise segment. The available product data shows multiple related acrylic product listings, suggesting some degree of category focus. However, no factory area, employee number, production line information, or annual capacity data is provided. These missing indicators limit visibility into the company’s actual manufacturing scale and production stability.

The verified supplier status provides some basic confidence that the company has passed a level of platform-side verification, but this alone is not enough to confirm whether the supplier has medium or large-scale production capability.

Scoring Rationale

Because factory size and workforce data are unavailable, the supplier cannot be confidently classified as a medium or large factory. The verified supplier status supports a baseline level of legitimacy, and the product range indicates focused operational activity, but the lack of production scale data creates procurement uncertainty. Therefore, the company is best assessed as a small or insufficiently documented supplier with basic production capability.

Final Score

11 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / platform tags: “Response time ≤1h”, “On-time delivery 66.7%”
  • Other certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These elements provide a basic compliance and transaction protection framework for buyers. The 2-year Gold Supplier history indicates some platform continuity, though it is not long enough to be considered a long-established supplier on the platform.

The available tags also include response time and delivery performance, but there is no data showing formal product certifications, factory management system certifications, industry-specific compliance credentials, or third-party inspection systems beyond supplier verification.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has core credibility features, including Gold Supplier membership, Trade Assurance, and verification. However, the Gold Supplier duration is relatively short, and certification information is incomplete. This supports a moderate credibility score rather than a high score.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 20+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
  • Store rating: 3.9
  • Review count: 8

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded commercial activity on the platform, with more than 20 orders and over CN¥67.6K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that buyers have placed real orders and that the supplier has some transaction history.

However, the order volume and transaction value remain limited compared with suppliers that show stronger commercial validation. The store rating of 3.9 is below a strong satisfaction benchmark, and the review count of 8 is relatively small. This means buyer feedback is not yet broad enough to fully validate consistent service, product quality, or delivery reliability.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has measurable transaction history, but the business scale is still relatively low. The limited review base and moderate rating reduce confidence in repeatable buyer satisfaction. The performance level is therefore below a stable medium-scale supplier but above a completely unverified seller.

Final Score

11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤1h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data
  • Communication efficiency: Response time data available only

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong response speed, with a stated response time of less than or equal to one hour. This is a positive indicator for buyers requiring quick quotation, artwork confirmation, sample discussion, or order coordination.

However, although the listed products are described as custom acrylic products, the provided data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization” capability as a platform service tag. Therefore, customization capability cannot be scored as fully verified beyond the product naming itself.

Scoring Rationale

The response speed meets the highest service-response standard. However, because explicit Full Customization support is not provided in the data, the score should not reach the maximum range. The supplier appears responsive but has incomplete evidence for advanced customization service capability.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 66.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 66.7%, which is below the 70% threshold. This is a significant concern for procurement planning, especially for buyers with fixed sales windows, event-based merchandise launches, promotional campaigns, or seasonal inventory requirements.

A delivery rate at this level suggests potential risk in production scheduling, order handling, logistics coordination, or delivery commitment management. No additional data is provided to explain whether the low rate is temporary, product-specific, or caused by external logistics factors.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate below 70% should receive below 5 points. Since the supplier’s rate is 66.7%, delivery reliability is weak and represents one of the main procurement risks.

Final Score

4 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 3.9
  • Review count: 8
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Verified supplier status is provided
  • On-platform customer feedback volume: Limited

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 3.9, which indicates only moderate customer satisfaction. The review count is also low, with 8 reviews, so the available feedback base is not large enough to strongly confirm consistent quality performance.

The verified supplier status provides some quality-related credibility at the company verification level, but there is no explicit evidence of Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control procedures, inspection reports, or product certification. This limits confidence in quality assurance, especially for customized acrylic products where print accuracy, cutting precision, packaging protection, and surface finish can be important.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has some customer feedback and verification support, but the rating is not high, the number of reviews is limited, and the quality assurance system is not clearly documented. As a result, quality confidence remains moderate to low.

Final Score

10 / 20

Total Score

59 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended only for small trial orders or low-risk customized acrylic products. The supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ acrylic standees, anime merchandise samples, or early-stage product testing.

The main risks are weak delivery performance, limited company scale transparency, low review volume, and moderate store rating. Large-volume, urgent, or strict delivery-deadline orders are not recommended without further verification.

Before placing larger orders, buyers should request factory capacity details, employee count, production lead time confirmation, sample approval, quality inspection evidence, and written delivery commitments. The supplier has some growth potential due to responsive communication, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status, but current data supports only cautious engagement.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Dongguan Yuehong Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuehong Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fafaliang Packaging Materials (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fafaliang Packaging Materials (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anqing Decoration Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anqing Decoration Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yukang Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yukang Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongcheng Chuangmei Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongcheng Chuangmei Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jiaqing Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jiaqing Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Tengyuan Painting Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Tengyuan Painting Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Nuohong Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Nuohong Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qianxun Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qianxun Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dingjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dingjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuyun Packaging (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuyun Packaging (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gongying Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gongying Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xiangnian Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xiangnian Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Bolaiyuan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Bolaiyuan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Zhongjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Zhongjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Dinghe Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Dinghe Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Sanyuan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Sanyuan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Chenchao Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Chenchao Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shandong Wogong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Wogong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chengda Auto Sales Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chengda Auto Sales Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yancheng Jiatian Arts & Crafts Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yancheng Jiatian Arts & Crafts Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shefan Hotel Supplies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shefan Hotel Supplies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Qichen Machinery Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Qichen Machinery Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fd Seals Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fd Seals Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Hoterwill Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Hoterwill Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Litai Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Litai Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuhuan Shuangqi Home Furnishing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuhuan Shuangqi Home Furnishing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Landward Heavy Industry Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Landward Heavy Industry Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Tomato Fence Import And Export Co. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Tomato Fence Import And Export Co. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xicheng Ep (Cn) Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Xicheng Ep (Cn) Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Hengliyou Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Hengliyou Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Yusheng Trading Corp., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Yusheng Trading Corp., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Hengchen Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Hengchen Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qisheng Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qisheng Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Airmext Technology Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Airmext Technology Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Jianshun Light Industrial Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Jianshun Light Industrial Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Kangfa Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Kangfa Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yaheng Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yaheng Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026