Guangde Shuaima Security Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Guangde Shuaima Security Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Guangde Shuaima Security Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Anhui, offering security-related storage products such as password key boxes, book safes, electronic digital safes, portable iron toolboxes, and wall-mounted key boxes. Based on the provided data, the company shows a relatively solid physical manufacturing base, with a reported factory area of over 49,000 m², more than 130 staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is supported by Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and basic platform labels, although the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year. Commercial performance remains limited, with 10+ orders and CN¥6.7K+ transaction value over the past six months, while customer feedback is positive but based on only 3 reviews. The major concern is delivery reliability, with an on-time delivery rate of only 50.0%. This supplier may be suitable for trial orders, small-volume sourcing, or price-sensitive buyers, but larger procurement programs should proceed cautiously.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company name: Guangde Shuaima Security Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
• Country: China
• Factory location: Anhui
• Factory area: 49,000+ m²
• Employees: 130+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a sizeable factory area of over 49,000 m², which indicates a meaningful physical production footprint. The employee count of 130+ staff suggests an established operating structure rather than a very small workshop. The verified supplier status adds a degree of credibility to the company’s claimed operational presence.

However, the provided data does not include detailed information on production lines, annual capacity, machinery, quality laboratories, export history, or factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier status. Therefore, while the company appears to have a stable manufacturing base, the actual depth of production capability cannot be fully confirmed from the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The large factory area is a strong positive factor and supports the view that the supplier has a meaningful production base. The staff size is moderate and suitable for a mid-sized factory profile. Verified supplier status further supports basic operational credibility. However, due to the absence of detailed production capacity, equipment, output volume, or specific factory certification data, it would not be appropriate to rate the company as a top-tier large-scale supply chain. The supplier fits best into the “medium-sized stable factory” category.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verification / platform labels:
• Response time ≤12h
• On-time delivery 50.0%
• Verified supplier: True
• Other certification information: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has Gold Supplier status and supports Trade Assurance, both of which provide basic platform-level credibility. Verified supplier status also supports the legitimacy of the supplier profile. These factors indicate that the supplier has passed certain platform-level checks and can provide buyers with some transactional protection through .

However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits the supplier’s long-term platform track record. The provided certification or industry tags are also limited and do not include detailed compliance certifications, factory audit reports, product certifications, or quality management system certifications. Therefore, platform credibility is present but not yet mature or comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These elements justify a score above the basic level. However, the short Gold Supplier duration and limited certification tag completeness prevent a higher rating. A supplier with longer platform history and broader compliance documentation would score higher.

Final Score

14 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 10+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥6.7K+
• Store rating: 4.7
• Number of reviews: 3

Elaboration

The supplier has generated some measurable activity on the platform, with 10+ orders and CN¥6.7K+ in transaction value over the past six months. This confirms that the store has completed transactions and is not entirely unproven. The store rating of 4.7 is positive, suggesting that existing buyers have generally provided favorable feedback.

However, the overall transaction scale is still relatively low. CN¥6.7K+ over six months indicates limited commercial volume on the platform. The review count is only 3, which is too small to provide strong statistical confidence in customer satisfaction. As a result, the supplier’s commercial validation remains limited.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has real transaction history and a good rating, but both order volume and transaction value are modest. The very small number of reviews weakens confidence in the reliability of the rating. This supplier cannot yet be considered commercially mature or strongly validated by marketplace activity. The appropriate rating is therefore in the lower-to-mid range for business performance.

Final Score

11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤12h
• Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
• Additional service capability information: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time is within 12 hours, which indicates acceptable communication responsiveness for normal sourcing inquiries. This level of response is suitable for routine quotation, order clarification, and basic pre-sales communication.

However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, packaging customization, branding customization, or engineering-level product development. Since customization capability is an important part of service evaluation, the absence of this information limits the score.

Scoring Rationale

A ≤12h response time is acceptable but not at the highest service level, as the top scoring band requires response within one hour combined with strong customization capability. Because Full Customization is not confirmed, the supplier should not be rated as having advanced service capability. The score reflects adequate communication but insufficient evidence of deeper customization service.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 50.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is reported at 50.0%. This is a significant weakness from a procurement perspective. For buyers with strict replenishment schedules, seasonal demand, project deadlines, or marketplace fulfillment requirements, a 50.0% on-time rate represents a material operational risk.

The data does not provide additional explanation for the low delivery rate, such as order complexity, logistics disruption, buyer-side changes, or sample-order impact. Therefore, the assessment must be based strictly on the reported figure.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring framework, delivery performance below 70% should receive below 5 points. A 50.0% on-time delivery rate is well below the acceptable benchmark for stable supply chain execution. This is the supplier’s most critical weakness and should be treated as a key risk before placing larger or time-sensitive orders.

Final Score

3 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.7
• Number of reviews: 3
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided as True
• Additional quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The store rating of 4.7 is favorable and suggests that the limited number of customers who left feedback were generally satisfied. Verified supplier status also provides some support for the supplier’s credibility.

However, the number of reviews is only 3, which is too limited to establish a strong quality track record. The provided information does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, third-party quality inspection, product testing, ISO certification, or any product-specific compliance certification. As a result, the quality assurance system cannot be fully evaluated.

Scoring Rationale

The positive store rating supports a moderate quality score, but the low review count significantly limits confidence. Verified supplier status is helpful, but it does not replace detailed evidence of inspection systems or quality certifications. Since Finished Product Inspection and broader quality control documentation are not provided, the supplier should be considered to have basic but not fully proven quality assurance capability.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended for small-scale trial orders only.

Guangde Shuaima Security Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. shows a solid basic manufacturing profile, supported by a large reported factory area, 130+ staff, verified supplier status, Gold Supplier status, and Trade Assurance. These factors make the supplier a reasonable candidate for initial sourcing evaluation, especially for buyers seeking security storage products such as key boxes, small safes, and portable storage solutions.

However, the supplier is not yet strongly validated from a commercial or delivery-performance perspective. The past six-month transaction value of CN¥6.7K+ and 10+ orders indicate limited platform sales activity. Customer feedback is positive but based on only 3 reviews. The most significant risk is the 50.0% on-time delivery rate, which is substantially below acceptable procurement standards.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers seeking trial orders or sample validation
- Small-volume importers
- Price-sensitive buyers with flexible delivery timelines
- Buyers willing to conduct additional supplier verification before scaling orders

Main risks:
- Low on-time delivery rate
- Limited transaction history
- Very small review base
- Insufficient data on Full Customization
- Insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection and formal quality certifications

Growth potential:
The supplier has physical factory scale and basic platform credibility. If it improves delivery reliability, expands verified quality documentation, and accumulates more transaction history and customer reviews, it could become a more competitive mid-sized supplier for security storage products.