Guangzhou Huijing Delong Garment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Huijing Delong Garment Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based garment supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 4,600+ m² and 260+ staff. Based on the provided data, the supplier appears to have a medium-scale manufacturing foundation with factory verification status marked as true. Its listed products focus on waterproof, windproof, and three-in-one outerwear categories, with low MOQ of 10 pieces and a price range of CN¥217.72–310.35. On , the company is a 1-year Gold Supplier and supports Trade Assurance, with platform tags showing response time within 2 hours and an on-time delivery rate of 93.3%. Business performance is moderate, with 20+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months. However, the review count is limited at 6, and there is insufficient data on customization capability and finished product inspection. Overall, this supplier may suit small to mid-sized buyers seeking tested outerwear products with low MOQ and verified delivery performance.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 4,600+ m²
- Employees: 260+ staff
- Factory verified supplier: True
- Country/region: Guangdong, China

Elaboration
The supplier has a reported factory area of more than 4,600 square meters and over 260 employees, indicating a structured manufacturing setup rather than a very small workshop. The presence of factory verification strengthens confidence in its operational legitimacy. However, no specific data is provided on production lines, monthly output capacity, machinery, or factory audit details.

Scoring Rationale
The factory size and staff count indicate a medium-scale and relatively stable production base. Factory verification provides additional support for supplier credibility. However, the available information does not prove large-scale supply chain capacity, and the absence of detailed production capacity limits the score from reaching the top range.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry tags: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 93.3%”
- Factory verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has core platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance support. Factory verification is also provided, which improves trustworthiness. However, the Gold Supplier history is short at only 1 year, and the provided certification labels mainly relate to response and delivery performance rather than broader compliance or product-specific certification.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the essential platform safeguards needed for initial sourcing, including Trade Assurance and verification. The short Gold Supplier duration and limited certification-label depth prevent it from being classified as a long-established, fully mature platform supplier.

Final Score
15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 20+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Review count: 6

Elaboration
The supplier has demonstrated recent transaction activity, with more than 20 orders and over CN¥67.6K in sales within six months. The 4.8 rating is positive, but the review base is small, with only 6 reviews. This means the rating is favorable but not yet supported by a large volume of buyer feedback.

Scoring Rationale
Business performance shows active but modest commercial validation. The number of orders and transaction value suggest the supplier has real market activity, but the scale is not high. The limited review count reduces confidence in long-term buyer satisfaction consistency.

Final Score
13 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency beyond response time: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours indicates acceptable communication speed for sourcing inquiries. However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports full customization, logo customization, material customization, packaging customization, or dedicated OEM/ODM services.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed is strong but does not meet the highest scoring condition of ≤1 hour. Since customization capability is not provided, the service score should remain moderate rather than high. The supplier appears responsive, but its ability to support complex buyer requirements cannot be confirmed.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 93.3%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is above 90%, which indicates reliable delivery execution based on the provided platform data. This is a strong indicator for buyers concerned with shipment predictability.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% falls into the 9–10 point range. The supplier achieves 93.3%, supporting a high delivery score. The score is not set at the maximum because no additional data is provided on average lead time, late shipment causes, or historical delivery stability.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.8
- Review count: 6
- Factory verification: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a high store rating of 4.8, which is positive. Factory verification adds a degree of operational credibility. However, the review count is only 6, which limits the statistical reliability of customer feedback. There is also no provided confirmation of Finished Product Inspection or other quality-control certification.

Scoring Rationale
The high rating and verified factory status support a reasonable quality score. However, the limited number of reviews and lack of confirmed finished product inspection prevent classification as a supplier with a fully proven quality assurance system.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

74 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small to mid-sized buyers seeking waterproof or windproof outerwear with low MOQ requirements and moderate transaction risk. The supplier shows a credible medium-scale factory base, Trade Assurance support, factory verification, and strong on-time delivery performance. It is suitable for trial orders, sample-based evaluation, and controlled-volume purchasing.

Key risks include limited review volume, only 1 year of Gold Supplier history, insufficient data on full customization capability, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection. Growth potential exists if the supplier can provide stronger quality-control documentation, more buyer feedback, and clearer customization capabilities.