zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Hangzhou Jinglian I & E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Hangzhou Jinglian I & E Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 2,200+ sqm and 30+ staff. The company offers e-bike and cargo-bike related protective and weatherproof accessory products, including display covers, handlebar protection, transport covers, and cargo bike canopies. Based on the provided data, the supplier appears to be a small-to-medium scale manufacturer or trading/manufacturing operation with verified supplier status, Gold Supplier status for 4 years, Trade Assurance support, and platform labels including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Minor Customization. Its commercial track record shows 10+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 5.0 store rating but only 4 reviews. The supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking customized e-bike accessory products in moderate order quantities. Key limitations include limited review volume, moderate transaction history, and an 83.3% on-time delivery rate, which requires delivery monitoring before scaling procurement.

Hangzhou Jinglian I & E Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 2,200+ sqm
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope includes multiple e-bike and cargo-bike accessory items
- Factory audit details or third-party factory certification: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a reported production site of more than 2,200 sqm and over 30 employees, indicating a relatively compact production organization. This scale suggests basic manufacturing or assembly capability, particularly for accessory products such as covers, protection cases, and canopies. The presence of multiple related product listings shows some category focus in e-bike and cargo-bike protection solutions. However, the available data does not indicate a large workforce, extensive factory footprint, production line count, annual capacity, machinery details, or internationally recognized factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The company should not be classified as a large-scale stable supply chain because its factory area and workforce are modest. However, it is stronger than a very small or unverified supplier because it has a defined facility size, employee count, verified supplier status, and a focused product range. The lack of deeper factory audit data and production capacity figures limits confidence in scalability.

Final Score
13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 4 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Full customization, Minor customization
- Independent compliance certificates: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. A 4-year Gold Supplier history provides some continuity, while Trade Assurance offers transaction protection through the platform. Verified supplier status further supports baseline credibility. The listed platform labels also show service and quality-related capabilities, especially Finished Product Inspection and customization-related tags. However, the data does not provide external certifications, audited management system certificates, product compliance certifications, or detailed verification reports.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core platform credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, 4-year tenure, Trade Assurance, and verification. This supports a relatively strong platform profile. The score is not at the highest level because the Gold Supplier tenure is moderate rather than long-term, and there is insufficient data on independent compliance certificates or detailed factory audit outcomes.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 4

Elaboration
The supplier has recent transaction activity, with more than 10 orders and over CN¥202.8K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has achieved actual platform-based commercial transactions rather than only maintaining product listings. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review base is very limited at only 4 reviews, which weakens the statistical reliability of the rating. The order and transaction levels suggest moderate early-stage or niche commercial traction rather than high-volume marketplace performance.

Scoring Rationale
The business performance is credible but not strong enough to be considered high-volume. The 5.0 rating is favorable, and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value provides evidence of paid orders, but 10+ orders over six months and only 4 reviews indicate limited market validation. Therefore, the supplier fits the lower-to-mid range of stable business performance rather than a high-performing supplier profile.

Final Score
13 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤10h
- Full Customization: Listed
- Minor Customization: Listed
- ODM service available: Listed
- Detailed communication efficiency metrics: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier supports Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service, which is a positive indicator for buyers requiring adapted product designs, branding, or specification adjustments. This is relevant for e-bike accessory buyers who may need fit, material, waterproofing, or structural customization. However, the response time is reported as within 10 hours, which is acceptable but not fast enough to meet the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. No additional data is provided on quote turnaround time, sample lead time, engineering support, or after-sales responsiveness.

Scoring Rationale
The customization capability is a clear strength, especially because both Full Customization and ODM service are listed. However, the communication response time of ≤10h is only moderate. Since the highest score requires response within one hour plus strong customization capability, this supplier is more appropriately positioned in the normal-response, customization-capable range.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 83.3%

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 83.3%. This falls within the 80% to 89% performance band. It indicates that most shipments are delivered on time, but there is still a meaningful risk of delay. For buyers operating seasonal sales cycles, project-based launches, or inventory-sensitive distribution models, this delivery performance should be monitored closely. The data does not include average lead time, sample lead time, production cycle, logistics method, or historical delay causes.

Scoring Rationale
According to the delivery scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7 to 8 points. Since 83.3% is in the lower-middle part of this band, the supplier receives a conservative score within that range.

Final Score
7 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 4
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory Verification: Insufficient Data beyond verified supplier status
- Product defect rate, return rate, or complaint details: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, which is positive, but the rating is based on only 4 reviews. This limited review volume makes the customer feedback profile less reliable for larger procurement decisions. The Finished Product Inspection label is a meaningful quality-control indicator, showing that the supplier has at least a platform-recognized inspection-related capability. Verified supplier status also adds baseline credibility. However, there is no provided data on defect rates, inspection standards, product test reports, material certifications, warranty claims, or detailed customer complaint history.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates basic quality assurance through Finished Product Inspection and a high store rating. However, the small number of reviews prevents the rating from being considered a strong customer feedback base. Because quality information is present but not comprehensive, the supplier fits the “good rating with basic quality control” range rather than the top-tier category.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 71 / 100

  • Company Strength: 13 / 20
  • Platform & Compliance Credibility: 16 / 20
  • Business Performance: 13 / 20
  • Service Capability: 7 / 10
  • Delivery Performance: 7 / 10
  • Quality & Customer Feedback: 15 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order volume and clear delivery safeguards. Hangzhou Jinglian I & E Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking e-bike and cargo-bike protective accessories, especially those requiring ODM, minor customization, or full customization at moderate MOQs of 500 to 1,000 pieces.

The supplier is best suited for small to mid-sized importers, e-commerce sellers, niche e-bike accessory brands, and buyers testing customized protective cover products before scaling. It is not yet strongly validated for large-volume or time-critical procurement due to limited review count, moderate six-month order volume, and an 83.3% on-time delivery rate.

Main risks include limited customer feedback depth, insufficient disclosed factory certification data, and delivery reliability that is acceptable but not excellent. Growth potential exists due to the supplier’s platform credibility, customization capability, verified status, and focused product category, but buyers should start with sample orders or pilot production, define inspection requirements, and confirm delivery schedules before larger commitments.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Hangzhou Yintex Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yintex Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hydrotech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hydrotech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Rollmed Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Rollmed Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Huanwei Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Huanwei Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Bison Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Bison Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Grin (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Grin (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fenloc Bondtek Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fenloc Bondtek Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Sdm Magnetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Sdm Magnetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jiuzhong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jiuzhong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Benhao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Benhao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langbin Technology (Hangzhou ) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langbin Technology (Hangzhou ) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yuanji Gift Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yuanji Gift Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Meideng Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Meideng Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Nidu Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Nidu Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Shangyou Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Shangyou Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Sakura Thread Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Sakura Thread Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Esd Acoustic (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Esd Acoustic (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Tuoshen Teachnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Tuoshen Teachnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Wei Bi Ma Automation Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Wei Bi Ma Automation Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Sichuan Xinhengju Automotive Service Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Xinhengju Automotive Service Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Meipai Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Meipai Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Guangtuo Frp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Guangtuo Frp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Jiaxinqi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Jiaxinqi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Tek Silver Fiber Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Tek Silver Fiber Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Gracer Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Gracer Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Kangzhimei Daily Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Kangzhimei Daily Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Muduoduo Livestock Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Muduoduo Livestock Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Rogenilan Windows And Doors Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Rogenilan Windows And Doors Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Sosn Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Sosn Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Brother Alloy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Brother Alloy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xingrui Precision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xingrui Precision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Longyue Stationery & Gifts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Longyue Stationery & Gifts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Sentaiyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Sentaiyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Elisha Mineral Water Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Elisha Mineral Water Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xingyang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xingyang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Mingxin Metallurgy Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Mingxin Metallurgy Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Home Design Houseware Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Home Design Houseware Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Luhua Group Trading Co., Ltd. E-Commerce Branch Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Luhua Group Trading Co., Ltd. E-Commerce Branch Supplier Evaluation
Luxstar Industrial(Jiangsu) Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luxstar Industrial(Jiangsu) Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026