Shanghai Dongyuan Chemical New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shanghai Dongyuan Chemical New Material Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, offering insecticide and mosquito repellent products including liquid insecticides, aerosol sprays, biological pesticide aerosols, and customized-label insecticide sprays. Based on the provided data, the company shows solid physical production capacity, with a reported factory area of over 28,000㎡, more than 460 staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is supported by Gold Supplier status for 2 years, Trade Assurance, finished product inspection, ODM service availability, warranty availability, and minor customization labels. However, its recent commercial performance is weakly validated, with only 1 order and CN¥202.8+ transaction value over the past six months, no available store rating, and zero reviews. The supplier appears more suitable for buyers prioritizing manufacturing scale, basic platform protection, inspection support, and customized insecticide product sourcing, while requiring careful sample testing, documentation review, and trial orders before larger procurement commitments.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Shanghai, China
- Factory area: 28,000+㎡
- Employees: 460+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product categories include insecticide liquids, aerosol sprays, mosquito repellents, and biological pesticide aerosol products.

Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates a relatively substantial operational footprint based on the reported factory size and workforce. A 28,000+㎡ factory and 460+ staff indicate that the company is not a small workshop-level supplier, but rather has a sizeable production organization. The presence of multiple insecticide-related product listings also suggests a focused product scope within household pest-control and pesticide aerosol categories. Verified supplier status provides an additional layer of basic factory credibility.

Scoring Rationale:
The company’s physical scale and employee count support classification as a stable medium-to-large manufacturer. The verified supplier status further strengthens confidence in its production base. However, the data does not provide detailed annual output, production lines, equipment capacity, export volume, or specific factory audit certificate names, so the score should not reach the highest tier reserved for fully transparent large-scale supply chains.

Final Score: 18/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry labels: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Minor customization
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has several important platform trust indicators, including Gold Supplier membership, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. The presence of finished product inspection and warranty availability improves platform-level compliance credibility, while ODM service and minor customization indicate some degree of product development or adaptation support. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, which is relatively short compared with long-established platform suppliers.

Scoring Rationale:
Core platform protections are present, especially Trade Assurance and supplier verification. The available labels are useful, but the data does not include internationally recognized product certifications, regulatory registrations, safety compliance documents, factory audit reports, or detailed inspection standards. Therefore, credibility is solid but not fully mature or comprehensive.

Final Score: 16/20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 1
- Transaction amount in past 6 months: CN¥202.8+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Reviews: 0

Elaboration:
The supplier’s recent platform transaction activity is very limited based on the provided figures. Only one order and a transaction amount of CN¥202.8+ over six months indicate low visible commercial validation on the platform. The absence of a store rating and zero customer reviews also limits the ability to verify buyer satisfaction, repeat purchasing, or transaction consistency.

Scoring Rationale:
Although the supplier has a strong production base, business performance must be scored primarily on actual visible transaction data. With only one recent order, very low transaction value, no rating, and no reviews, there is insufficient marketplace evidence to confirm stable commercial performance. This dimension therefore receives a low score due to weak external buying validation.

Final Score: 6/20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: ≤7h
- ODM service available
- Minor customization available
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of within 7 hours suggests acceptable but not exceptional communication speed. ODM service availability and minor customization indicate that the supplier can support some product adaptation or private-label related needs. However, the provided data does not confirm full customization capability, nor does it include communication quality, quotation speed, technical support level, or multilingual service capability.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates basic-to-moderate service capability through acceptable response speed and customization-related labels. However, because response time is not within the strongest benchmark of one hour or less, and full customization is not confirmed, the service score should remain in the middle range rather than the top tier.

Final Score: 7/10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery indicator under the provided scoring framework. This suggests that, for recorded platform transactions, shipment punctuality has been fully maintained. However, the interpretation should consider that recent order volume is only 1 order, so the statistical reliability of this delivery rate is limited.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring rule, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. The supplier reaches 100.0%, which supports a high score. Nevertheless, because the underlying six-month order count is extremely low, a perfect score is not appropriate; the delivery performance is positive but not yet strongly validated across multiple orders.

Final Score: 9/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Finished product inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Reviews: 0
- Warranty available

Elaboration:
The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, including finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. These are positive signs for basic quality control and platform-level assurance. However, the absence of store rating and customer reviews means there is no visible customer-side evidence of product satisfaction, complaint handling, or repeat order confidence.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has foundational quality safeguards, but the customer feedback side is weak due to zero reviews and unavailable rating data. Finished product inspection supports a moderate quality score, but without customer validation or detailed inspection standards, the supplier cannot be rated in the higher quality tier.

Final Score: 13/20

Total Score

Total Score: 69/100

Score breakdown:
- Company Strength: 18/20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 16/20
- Business Performance: 6/20
- Service Capability: 7/10
- Delivery Performance: 9/10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 13/20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended. Shanghai Dongyuan Chemical New Material Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking insecticide, mosquito repellent, aerosol pesticide, biological pesticide aerosol, and customized-label insecticide products from a supplier with meaningful factory scale, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance, finished product inspection, ODM support, and minor customization capability.

The supplier is most suitable for buyers that can start with sample evaluation, small trial orders, and specification-based procurement before scaling volume. The main risks are weak recent transaction validation, only 1 order in the past six months, very low disclosed transaction amount, no store rating, and zero reviews. Its growth potential lies in its factory scale, workforce size, inspection label, and platform protections, but buyers should verify product compliance documents, samples, labeling requirements, and quality consistency before placing large orders.