Shantou P&C Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Shantou P&C Plastic Products Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based plastic products supplier with a stated factory area of 42,000+㎡ and 420+ staff, indicating a relatively strong manufacturing footprint for toys and outdoor play products. The supplier offers products such as kids’ bowling toy sets, sticky catch ball game sets, and inflatable beach ball toys, with listed MOQs ranging from 75 to 2,000 pieces. On platform credibility, the company shows solid baseline trust signals, including 6 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, supplier verification, and a 100.0% on-time delivery label. However, its recent commercial performance is very limited, with only 1 order and CN¥676.9+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by only 1 review despite a 5.0 store rating. This supplier may be suitable for buyers prioritizing factory scale, verified supplier status, and small-to-mid trial procurement, but larger buyers should further validate production consistency, customization capability, and quality control systems before scaling orders.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 42,000+㎡
- Employees: 420+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope provided: plastic toy and outdoor play products
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a sizable physical production base, with both factory area and staff count indicating a manufacturing operation beyond a small workshop. A 42,000+㎡ facility and 420+ staff suggest the company has meaningful production capacity and organizational structure. The verified supplier status further strengthens the credibility of its operational presence. However, the data does not provide details on production lines, monthly output, machinery, export volume, factory audit type, or specific factory certifications.
Scoring Rationale
The company has strong factory-size indicators and verified supplier status, which supports a high score in this category. The main limitation is the absence of deeper production capability data, such as annual capacity, equipment details, or formal factory audit reports. Therefore, it is positioned as a large and relatively stable supplier, though not enough information is available to assign a perfect score.
Final Score
18 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier years: 6 yrs
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤22h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
Elaboration
The supplier has multiple platform-based credibility signals. Six years as a Gold Supplier indicates a reasonably established presence, while Trade Assurance provides transaction protection for buyers. Verified supplier status adds an additional layer of platform credibility. The listed tags also show operational performance indicators, particularly on-time delivery. However, no independent product certifications, safety standards, laboratory testing reports, or compliance certificates are provided in the supplied data.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs well on platform credibility due to Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, and verification status. Six years is a meaningful track record, though not exceptionally long. The lack of detailed compliance documents or product certification data prevents a top-tier score, especially for toy-related procurement where certification evidence may be important.
Final Score
17 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 1
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥676.9+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 1
Elaboration
The supplier’s recent transaction performance is limited based on the available platform data. Although the store rating is 5.0, it is supported by only 1 review, which makes the rating statistically weak. The past six-month transaction value of CN¥676.9+ and only 1 order indicate low recent commercial activity on the platform. This does not necessarily reflect total offline business volume, but no offline sales data is provided.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a positive rating, but the extremely small order count and review base provide limited commercial validation. A high rating from a single review cannot be treated as strong evidence of broad market acceptance. As a result, the score should reflect low recent transaction proof rather than the supplier’s factory size.
Final Score
10 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤22h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency beyond response tag: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier provides a response-time tag of ≤22 hours, which indicates that inquiries are answered within roughly one business day. This is acceptable but not fast enough to qualify as high-speed response performance under the given scoring criteria. No data is provided regarding Full Customization, private labeling, packaging design, ODM/OEM service, sampling speed, or dedicated account management.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows basic service responsiveness, but the response time is not within the ≤1 hour range required for the highest score. Since customization capability is not stated, it cannot be credited. The score therefore reflects basic but not advanced service capability.
Final Score
6 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery metric provided. This indicates that recorded platform shipments have been fulfilled on time. However, the delivery score should also be interpreted alongside the limited recent order volume, since only 1 order is reported in the past six months.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. The supplier reaches 100.0%, supporting a top score. Because the order sample size is very small, a full 10 is not assigned, but delivery performance remains strong based on available data.
Final Score
9 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 1
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Supplier verification provided as True
Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, but this is based on only 1 review. This limits the reliability of the feedback profile. Verified supplier status provides some confidence in company legitimacy, but no specific Finished Product Inspection information is provided. There is also no supplied data on product testing, defect rates, quality certifications, inspection reports, or customer complaint history.
Scoring Rationale
The quality score benefits from the 5.0 rating and verified supplier status, but the very low review count and absence of finished product inspection data constrain the assessment. The available quality evidence is positive but too limited to support a high score.
Final Score
12 / 20
Total Score
72 / 100
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 18 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 17 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 10 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 6 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 9 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 12 / 20 |
| Total | 72 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is conditionally recommended, especially for buyers seeking a verified Guangdong-based supplier with a sizable factory, established presence, Trade Assurance support, and strong stated on-time delivery performance. The supplier appears suitable for trial orders, small-to-mid volume procurement, and buyers of plastic toy or outdoor play products who prioritize factory scale and platform-backed transaction security.
Key risks include limited recent platform transaction volume, only 1 review, low commercial validation, insufficient data on Full Customization, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or product compliance certifications. Before large-scale cooperation, buyers should request product samples, inspection procedures, certification documents if required, customization confirmation, and production capacity evidence. Growth potential exists due to the supplier’s factory scale and platform credibility, but stronger transaction history and quality documentation would be needed to support higher procurement confidence.
Leave your comment