Shaodong City Longfeng Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Shaodong City Longfeng Industry Co., Ltd. is a China-based lighter supplier located in Hunan, with a reported factory area of 72,000+㎡ and 1,700+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company demonstrates strong production scale, especially for high-volume lighter products with MOQ levels ranging from 10,000 to 300,000 pieces. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 14 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and platform tags indicating 100.0% on-time delivery and response time within 4 hours. Commercial performance shows a relatively high transaction value of CN¥18.9M+ over the past six months, though the order count is moderate at 20+ and the review base is limited with only 3 reviews. The supplier appears most suitable for volume-oriented buyers seeking large-scale lighter procurement with stable delivery performance. Key caution areas include limited customer feedback volume and insufficient data on customization capability, finished product inspection, specific factory certifications, and export market experience.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Hunan, China
- Factory area: 72,000+㎡
- Employees: 1,700+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product MOQ range: 10,000 to 300,000 pieces
Elaboration
The supplier shows a large-scale manufacturing profile based on both facility size and workforce. A factory area above 72,000㎡ and more than 1,700 staff indicate substantial production infrastructure. The listed lighter products also show high MOQ requirements, particularly 200,000 to 300,000 pieces for several disposable and flint lighter products, which aligns with mass-production positioning. The verified supplier status provides an additional basic credibility signal regarding company existence and supplier profile verification.
Scoring Rationale
The company meets the criteria for a large-scale and stable supply chain due to its sizeable factory area, large employee base, and high-volume product MOQ structure. However, the provided data does not include detailed factory audit reports, production line count, monthly output, or specific factory certifications. Therefore, while the scale is clearly strong, the score is slightly below the maximum due to incomplete production certification details.
Final Score: 19/20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 14 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Platform/industry tags: “On-time delivery 100.0%”, “Response time ≤4h”
Elaboration
The supplier has a long operating history on as a 14-year Gold Supplier, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance support provides additional transaction protection for buyers using the platform. The verified supplier status further strengthens platform reliability. The available tags confirm delivery and response-related performance, but the provided data does not include detailed certification names, compliance documents, or industry-specific product certifications.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a complete core platform credibility structure: long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and performance-related platform labels. These factors place it in the highest credibility band. The only limitation is that certification or industry label information is not fully detailed beyond platform performance tags, preventing a perfect score.
Final Score: 19/20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 20+
- Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥18.9M+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 3
Elaboration
The supplier shows strong transaction value over the past six months, with CN¥18.9M+ in platform-reported sales. This suggests meaningful commercial activity, especially when combined with high MOQ product positioning. However, the number of orders is only 20+, which indicates that the commercial profile may rely on fewer but larger transactions. The store rating is excellent at 5.0, but the review count is very limited at only 3, reducing the statistical reliability of the rating.
Scoring Rationale
The high transaction amount supports a strong business performance assessment, while the moderate order count and very small review base limit the confidence level. This is not a low-performing supplier, but the limited review volume prevents classification as a fully validated high-order, high-feedback supplier. A score in the upper-middle range is appropriate.
Final Score: 16/20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Platform tag: “Response time ≤4h”
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the highest benchmark of response within 1 hour. No data is provided regarding Full Customization, OEM/ODM capability, design support, packaging customization, or dedicated account service. Therefore, service capability can only be assessed based on response speed, not customization depth.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates normal communication responsiveness, but the lack of confirmed customization capability limits the service score. Since the available response time is reasonable but not top-tier, and customization information is insufficient, the supplier fits the “normal response with limited service data” range.
Final Score: 7/10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
- Platform tag: “On-time delivery 100.0%”
Elaboration
The supplier’s stated on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is the strongest delivery indicator available in the provided data. This suggests that recent platform-recorded shipments were completed within expected delivery timelines. No additional data is provided regarding average lead time, logistics modes, production cycle, or late-shipment dispute history.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. A 100.0% rate supports the maximum delivery score. The absence of lead-time details does not reduce the score significantly because the required scoring basis is specifically the on-time shipment rate.
Final Score: 10/10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 3
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Insufficient Data beyond verified supplier status
Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect store rating of 5.0, which is positive, but the rating is based on only 3 reviews. This makes the feedback base too small to be considered highly representative. The verified supplier status provides some quality-related confidence at the company profile level, but the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, specific quality certifications, product testing standards, or detailed factory verification reports.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a strong rating but insufficient review volume and limited quality assurance documentation. Because the quality assessment depends heavily on customer feedback scale and inspection systems, the lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection and limited reviews prevent a high score. The supplier fits the range of acceptable quality signals but incomplete validation.
Final Score: 13/20
Total Score
84/100
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 19/20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 19/20 |
| Business Performance | 16/20 |
| Service Capability | 7/10 |
| Delivery Performance | 10/10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 13/20 |
| Total | 84/100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Shaodong City Longfeng Industry Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers seeking large-volume lighter procurement, stable platform-backed transactions, and strong delivery reliability. The supplier is particularly suitable for wholesalers, distributors, and importers with high MOQ acceptance and demand for mass-market lighter products.
Main risks include the limited number of customer reviews, insufficient data on Full Customization capability, lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection, and absence of detailed product certification or factory audit documentation in the provided dataset. Before placing large or repeat orders, buyers should request product compliance documents, inspection procedures, sample validation, packaging details, and written production lead-time commitments. Growth potential appears solid based on large production scale, long platform history, high transaction value, and 100.0% on-time delivery performance.
Leave your comment