Shaoxing Shangyu Hoping Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shaoxing Shangyu Hoping Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. is a Zhejiang-based Chinese supplier focused on small kitchen and drink-mixing appliances, including electric drink mixers, milk shake mixers, household stand mixers, mini appliances, and detachable hand appliance products. The company shows a relatively solid manufacturing base, with a reported factory area of over 11,000 m², more than 90 staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 21 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and listed tags including finished product inspection, ODM service, warranty availability, and social responsibility. Business activity appears commercially meaningful in transaction value, with CN¥1.9M+ in the past six months, although the order count is limited at 8 and customer feedback volume is very low with only 2 reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. Overall, this supplier is more suitable for buyers seeking an experienced, platform-verified manufacturer for kitchen appliance sourcing, especially where delivery reliability and basic quality controls are important.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 11,000+ m²
- Employees: 90+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Zhejiang, China

Elaboration:
The supplier has a measurable manufacturing footprint and workforce size, indicating established production operations rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. A factory size above 11,000 m² and more than 90 staff suggest the company has moderate production capacity suitable for regular appliance orders. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the stated company and factory information.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory. Its scale is not positioned as very large based on the provided employee count, but the factory area and verified supplier status support a reliable production foundation. Because the data confirms both physical scale and verification, the score should be above the small-factory range, but not at the highest level reserved for large-scale supply chains.

Final Score: 16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 21 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Tags: Socially responsible, Warranty available, Finished product inspection, ODM service available

Elaboration:
The company demonstrates strong platform credibility through a long Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance support. The 21-year Gold Supplier duration is a significant indicator of platform continuity. The available tags also show several relevant commercial and compliance-related signals, including warranty availability, social responsibility, finished product inspection, and ODM capability.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a complete and long-standing platform credibility profile. The combination of 21 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and multiple verification or service-related tags provides a strong trust framework for procurement evaluation. No additional external certifications are provided, so the score is strong but not treated as perfect beyond the verified platform information.

Final Score: 19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 8
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1.9M+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 2

Elaboration:
The supplier shows a relatively high transaction value compared with the limited number of recent orders, suggesting that recent orders may have been larger-value purchases. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review count is very limited, which reduces the reliability of customer feedback as a broad performance indicator.

Scoring Rationale:
The business performance is mixed. CN¥1.9M+ in six-month transaction value indicates meaningful commercial activity, but only 8 orders and 2 reviews limit the strength of market validation. The rating is excellent, but the low review base means it cannot be treated as fully representative. Therefore, the supplier is best assessed as having moderate and partially validated business performance.

Final Score: 15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: ≤2h
- ODM service available: listed in platform tags
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of within two hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for procurement inquiries. ODM service availability suggests some degree of product development or customization support. However, the provided data does not confirm Full Customization capability, so the supplier’s customization depth cannot be fully evaluated.

Scoring Rationale:
The service capability is above basic level due to relatively fast response and ODM service availability. However, because the response time is not within one hour and Full Customization is not confirmed, the supplier does not meet the top-tier service standard. The score reflects normal-to-good service capacity with incomplete customization evidence.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a perfect on-time dispatch rate, which is a strong indicator of delivery discipline on the platform. For procurement planning, this reduces concern around shipment timing based on the available data.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 2
- Finished product inspection: listed
- Factory Verification / verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has positive quality-related signals, including a 5.0 store rating, finished product inspection, and verified supplier status. These indicate that some quality assurance and verification mechanisms are present. However, the customer feedback sample is very small, with only 2 reviews, which limits the reliability of the rating as evidence of consistent buyer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a good quality assurance foundation, especially due to finished product inspection and verification status. However, the very low review count prevents the supplier from being rated in the highest quality-feedback tier. The score reflects good but not extensively validated quality performance.

Final Score: 15 / 20

Total Score

82 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled sourcing validation. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking kitchen appliance products from an experienced -verified manufacturer with strong platform credibility, reliable delivery performance, and moderate factory scale. It may be appropriate for importers, wholesalers, private-label buyers requiring ODM support, and buyers prioritizing Trade Assurance-backed transactions.

Key risks include limited recent order count, very low review volume, and insufficient data on Full Customization capability. Before placing large-volume orders, buyers should request product samples, confirm customization scope, verify inspection standards, and clarify warranty terms. The supplier’s growth potential is supported by its long platform history, verified factory profile, ODM tag, and strong dispatch performance, but broader customer feedback would be needed to further strengthen procurement confidence.