Shijiazhuang Maikesi Brace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Shijiazhuang Maikesi Brace Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of 5,100+ m² and 110+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a medium-sized manufacturer with verified supplier status and a focused product portfolio mainly covering gloves, including sun protection gloves, winter gloves, tactical gloves, driving gloves, cycling, fishing, and hunting gloves. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 9 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and listed service tags such as warranty availability, low MOQ for customization, and ODM service availability. Business performance is also solid, with 300+ orders and CN¥7.4M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.9 store rating and 100+ reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking competitively priced glove products with moderate-to-low MOQ options, platform-backed transaction protection, and stable delivery performance. Key data gaps include insufficient information on formal product certifications, finished product inspection systems, and detailed customization capability execution.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory area: 5,100+ m²
- Employees: 110+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Hebei, China
Elaboration
The supplier has a measurable production base with more than 5,100 m² of factory area and over 110 employees. This indicates a production setup beyond a small workshop level and suggests the ability to manage regular manufacturing operations. The verified supplier status further strengthens the credibility of its operating base, although the data does not provide additional details on production lines, annual capacity, machinery, or factory audit reports.
Scoring Rationale
The company fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory rather than a very large-scale supply chain. Its factory size and workforce are sufficient to support recurring production, and verified supplier status adds confidence. However, the absence of detailed production capacity, equipment information, and specific factory certification prevents a higher score in the 18–20 range.
Final Score
16 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Low MOQ for customization, ODM service available
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier shows strong platform-level credibility. A 9-year Gold Supplier history indicates long-term platform presence, while Trade Assurance provides buyers with transaction protection. The verified supplier status further supports basic compliance credibility. The listed tags show service-related platform labels, including warranty availability and ODM service availability, but no formal product compliance certifications or industry-specific certificates are provided in the data.
Scoring Rationale
The combination of 9 years Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status represents a relatively complete credibility profile. The supplier has stronger platform backing than newer or less verified suppliers. However, the certification information is mainly service-tag based rather than formal compliance certification, so the score is slightly below the highest range.
Final Score
18 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 300+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥7.4M+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 100+
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates active commercial performance on the platform. More than 300 orders in six months shows consistent buyer activity, while CN¥7.4M+ in transaction value indicates meaningful sales volume. A 4.9 store rating combined with 100+ reviews suggests generally positive buyer reception and a reasonable review base for commercial validation.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows strong recent business activity, with both order volume and transaction value at a healthy level. The 4.9 rating supports buyer satisfaction, and 100+ reviews provide useful validation. While performance is strong, the available data does not include repeat purchase rates, buyer geography, or customer segmentation, so the score is strong but not maximum.
Final Score
18 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Response time: ≤2h
- Platform tags: Low MOQ for customization, ODM service available
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has a response time of within two hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency. The platform tags suggest some customization capability, including low MOQ for customization and ODM service availability. However, the data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization, nor does it provide details on design support, sample lead time, private labeling, packaging customization, or engineering capability.
Scoring Rationale
The response speed is good but does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour. Customization-related tags are positive, especially ODM service availability, but the lack of explicit Full Customization data limits certainty. Therefore, the supplier is best assessed as having normal-to-good service capability rather than top-tier service strength.
Final Score
7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 97.8%
Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 97.8% is strong and falls clearly above the 90% threshold. This suggests reliable delivery execution based on the available platform data. No additional information is provided regarding average lead time, logistics channels, rush order handling, or seasonal capacity management.
Scoring Rationale
Because the on-time delivery rate is well above 90%, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery scoring range. The score is not set at the absolute maximum only because the data does not include broader delivery metrics such as lead time consistency or order fulfillment complexity.
Final Score
9 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 100+
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided
- Formal product quality certifications: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.9 and more than 100 reviews, which provides a positive indication of customer satisfaction. Verified supplier status adds some confidence in company legitimacy and factory-related credibility. However, the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, specific factory verification reports, product testing standards, or formal quality certifications.
Scoring Rationale
Customer feedback indicators are strong, with a high rating and a meaningful number of reviews. However, the quality assurance system is not fully documented in the supplied data. Since Finished Product Inspection and formal certification details are unavailable, the supplier cannot be rated as having a fully comprehensive quality control framework.
Final Score
16 / 20
Total Score
84 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is recommended for buyers seeking glove products with stable platform credibility, moderate production scale, low-to-medium MOQ options, and strong delivery reliability. The supplier is especially suitable for small to medium-sized importers, e-commerce sellers, promotional product buyers, and buyers testing multiple glove SKUs with controlled order quantities.
Main risks include insufficient data on formal product certifications, Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory audit results, and confirmed Full Customization capability. Buyers should request product test reports, inspection procedures, sample confirmation, packaging specifications, and compliance documents before placing larger or regulated-market orders.
Overall, Shijiazhuang Maikesi Brace Technology Co., Ltd. shows good growth potential due to its 9-year Gold Supplier record, active recent transaction performance, strong on-time delivery rate, and positive customer feedback.
Leave your comment