Shijiazhuang Tangju Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shijiazhuang Tangju Trading Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Hebei, offering laundry soap-related products with listed MOQs mainly between 20,000 and 25,000 pieces. Based on the provided data, the company shows a moderate production foundation, with a factory area of 5,700+㎡, 90+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 9 years as an Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance availability. Commercial performance shows CN¥3M+ transaction value over the past six months, but the order count is only 10+ and customer review volume is very limited at 2 reviews. Service and delivery performance appear acceptable, with response time within 5 hours and on-time delivery at 88.9%. This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale laundry soap sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection, while buyers requiring extensive quality documentation, strong customization proof, or large volumes of customer feedback should conduct further verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 5,700+㎡
- Employees: 90+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Hebei, China

Elaboration
The supplier has a measurable factory scale with more than 5,700㎡ of operating space and over 90 staff members. This suggests a basic-to-medium production structure rather than a very small workshop. The verified supplier status provides additional confidence that the company has undergone some level of supplier or factory verification. However, the provided data does not include detailed production lines, monthly capacity, machinery quantity, export volume, or formal factory audit reports.

Scoring Rationale
The company appears to be a medium-sized supplier with sufficient physical and personnel resources for stable production. The verified supplier status strengthens confidence in its operating legitimacy. However, because the factory size and staff count are not large-scale, and because production capacity details are not provided, it should not be scored as a top-tier large-scale supply chain manufacturer.

Final Score: 16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / platform tags: “Response time ≤5h”, “On-time delivery 88.9%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has 9 years of Gold Supplier history, which is a meaningful platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance availability adds transaction protection for buyers and reduces payment-related risk. The supplier also has platform-visible operational tags related to response time and delivery performance. However, the provided certification/tag data does not show broader product certifications, industry compliance certificates, or detailed third-party audit documentation.

Scoring Rationale
A 9-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status represent a relatively complete platform credibility profile. The supplier demonstrates stronger platform trust than newer or unverified suppliers. The score is not at the absolute maximum because the available certification information is limited mainly to platform performance tags rather than broader compliance or product-specific certification evidence.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction amount in past 6 months: CN¥3M+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 2

Elaboration
The supplier recorded CN¥3M+ in transactions over the past six months, indicating that completed business value is meaningful. However, the order count of 10+ is not high, suggesting the transaction volume may be concentrated in a relatively small number of orders. The store rating of 4.9 is strong, but the review base is only 2, which limits the reliability of customer feedback as a broad market validation indicator.

Scoring Rationale
The transaction amount supports a stable business foundation, but the limited order count and very small number of reviews reduce confidence in sustained, diversified market performance. The supplier performs better than a low-activity store, but the commercial evidence is not strong enough to classify it as high-order-volume or highly validated by many buyers.

Final Score: 15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤5h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s listed response time of within 5 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, although it does not reach the strongest service benchmark of response within 1 hour. No data is provided regarding Full Customization, design support, private labeling, packaging customization, or OEM/ODM service scope.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed is reasonable for standard procurement communication, but the lack of customization data prevents a higher score. Since service capability is evaluated not only by response time but also by customization support, the absence of evidence for Full Customization limits the assessment.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 88.9%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate falls within the 80%–89% range. This indicates generally acceptable delivery reliability, though there remains a measurable risk of delayed shipments compared with suppliers exceeding 90%.

Scoring Rationale
At 88.9%, the supplier is close to the 90% threshold but does not meet the top performance band. The delivery record is suitable for buyers with moderate scheduling flexibility, but customers with strict shipment deadlines should confirm lead times and delivery commitments before placing larger orders.

Final Score: 8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 2
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is positive. However, the number of reviews is only 2, making the rating less statistically reliable. Factory verification provides some confidence in supplier legitimacy and operational presence, but there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, product testing reports, quality certifications, or detailed inspection procedures.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has basic quality credibility through factory verification and a high rating, but the limited review count and lack of finished product inspection data restrict confidence in consistent quality performance. The score reflects acceptable but not fully proven quality assurance.

Final Score: 14 / 20

Total Score

78 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for buyers sourcing laundry soap products at medium order volumes, especially those who value platform credibility, Trade Assurance protection, and verified supplier status. The supplier is suitable for importers, wholesalers, and distributors seeking cost-sensitive laundry soap products with MOQs around 20,000–25,000 pieces.

Key risks include limited customer review volume, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, no provided evidence of Full Customization capability, and an on-time delivery rate below 90%. Before large-scale procurement, buyers should request product samples, inspection reports, customization confirmation if required, and written delivery commitments.

Overall, the supplier shows solid platform credibility and moderate operational strength, with growth potential if it can provide stronger quality documentation, broader customer feedback, and clearer customization capabilities.