Shijiazhuang Wolon Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shijiazhuang Wolon Sports Goods Co., Ltd. is a China-based sports goods supplier located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of over 15,000㎡ and more than 310 staff. Based on the available data, the company appears to have a solid manufacturing foundation for boxing and combat-sports-related products, including boxing gloves, kickboxing gloves, glove dryers, custom logo hand products, and new model sweat-out gloves. Its profile shows strong platform credibility, including 10 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, supplier verification, and relevant capability tags such as 3D design capabilities, low MOQ for customization, and finished product inspection. Business performance is supported by 90+ orders and CN¥1.8M+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 4.9 store rating. However, the review count is only 10+, which limits the depth of customer feedback validation. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking verified mid-to-large-scale sports goods production with flexible MOQ and moderate customization needs.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 15,000+㎡
- Employees: 310+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Hebei, China

Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates a relatively strong production foundation, with both factory size and workforce scale indicating more than a small workshop-level operation. A 15,000+㎡ facility and 310+ employees suggest the company may be capable of handling regular commercial orders and supporting multiple product lines within boxing and combat sports goods.

Scoring Rationale:
The factory scale and staffing level support a strong assessment under Company Strength. The presence of supplier verification further improves confidence in its operational legitimacy. However, the data does not provide detailed production capacity, equipment lists, production lines, or audited factory certification documents beyond verification status, so a perfect score is not justified.

Final Score: 18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 10 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: 3D design capabilities, Low MOQ for customization, Finished product inspection

Elaboration:
The supplier has a long-standing presence, supported by 10 years of Gold Supplier status. Trade Assurance availability provides an additional transactional protection mechanism for buyers. The listed capability and inspection tags further strengthen its platform profile, especially for buyers concerned with product development support and inspection processes.

Scoring Rationale:
A 10-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and supplier verification form a strong credibility base. The certification and capability tags are relevant and useful, though the data does not include independent third-party management certifications such as ISO or product-specific compliance certificates. Therefore, the supplier scores highly but not at the absolute maximum.

Final Score: 19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 90+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1.8M+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Review count: 10+

Elaboration:
The supplier shows active recent transaction performance, with 90+ orders and CN¥1.8M+ in transaction value over six months. The 4.9 store rating is strong and indicates positive buyer satisfaction among available reviews. However, the review base is relatively limited at 10+, which reduces the statistical strength of the rating.

Scoring Rationale:
The order volume and transaction value indicate stable business activity rather than an unproven supplier profile. The high rating supports commercial reliability, but the low review count prevents the score from entering the highest range reserved for suppliers with both high transaction volume and extensive buyer feedback.

Final Score: 17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: ≤4h
- Customization-related tags: Low MOQ for customization, 3D design capabilities
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of ≤4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. The platform tags suggest the supplier can support some customization-related needs, particularly low MOQ customization and 3D design support. However, explicit Full Customization capability is not provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale:
Service capability is above basic level due to reasonable response time and customization-related tags. Still, because the response time is not within the top-tier threshold and Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed, the score should remain in the moderate-to-good range rather than the highest band.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 92.6%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate exceeds 90%, which indicates relatively reliable fulfillment performance based on the available platform data. This is particularly important for buyers managing seasonal inventory, promotional launches, or repeat replenishment cycles.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. At 92.6%, the supplier demonstrates strong delivery reliability, though the score is kept at 9 rather than 10 because no additional delivery data, lead time consistency, or dispute rate information is provided.

Final Score: 9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.9
- Review count: 10+
- Finished product inspection: Present
- Factory / supplier verification: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a strong store rating and a listed finished product inspection capability, which supports confidence in its quality control process. Supplier verification also contributes positively to quality assurance credibility. However, the number of customer reviews is relatively small, limiting the depth of customer feedback analysis.

Scoring Rationale:
The high rating and finished product inspection tag justify a strong quality score. Factory verification further supports supplier reliability. Nevertheless, because only 10+ reviews are available, the customer feedback base is not large enough to classify the supplier as having extensive market-validated quality performance.

Final Score: 17 / 20

Total Score

87 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended, especially for buyers seeking boxing gloves or related combat sports goods from a verified Chinese supplier with stable platform credibility, flexible MOQ, and acceptable customization-related support. The supplier appears suitable for small-to-medium brands, online retailers, sports equipment distributors, and buyers testing new product designs with low MOQ requirements.

Key risks include limited review volume, lack of explicit Full Customization confirmation, and insufficient data on detailed production capacity, independent factory certifications, lead times, and product compliance standards. Growth potential is positive due to its 10-year Gold Supplier history, CN¥1.8M+ recent transaction value, 92.6% on-time delivery rate, and existing design/customization-related capability tags.