Yangzhou Zhuocheng Pneumatic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Yangzhou Zhuocheng Pneumatic Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based pneumatic products supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of 1,400+ sqm and 40+ staff. Based on the available data, the company appears to be a small-to-medium-sized supplier with basic production capacity and verified supplier status. Its product portfolio includes pneumatic components such as brass gas-related parts, air source units, pneumatic steam pipes, air regulators, and fittings, with relatively low MOQs on several listed items, making it potentially suitable for small-batch procurement, trial orders, and buyers requiring flexible sourcing quantities. On , the supplier has 5 years of Gold Supplier history, supports Trade Assurance, and carries customization-related service tags including Full Customization, ODM service, and Minor Customization. Business performance is moderate, with 100+ orders and CN¥405.6K+ transaction value over the past six months. The key strengths are delivery reliability, platform credibility, and customization availability. Main limitations are modest factory scale and insufficient disclosed quality-system details.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Jiangsu, China
- Factory area: 1,400+ sqm
- Employees: 40+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a disclosed physical production base with 1,400+ sqm of factory area and 40+ employees. This indicates an operational manufacturing setup rather than a purely trading-oriented profile, although the scale remains relatively modest compared with larger industrial manufacturers. The verified supplier status provides a basic level of confidence that the company’s operating information has undergone platform-side verification.
Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic factory capability and a verified supplier profile, but the reported factory area and employee count suggest a small-to-medium production scale rather than a large-scale stable supply chain. There is no provided evidence of advanced factory certification, large workforce capacity, or expanded production infrastructure. Therefore, the score should reflect adequate but not strong manufacturing strength.
Final Score
12 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier history: 5 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: Full customization, ODM service available, Minor customization, Response time ≤2h
Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively established profile with 5 years of Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance support. These factors improve transaction credibility and reduce procurement risk for buyers using -based purchasing workflows. The presence of customization and ODM-related tags also strengthens the supplier’s service presentation on the platform.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has several important credibility indicators: Gold Supplier status, 5-year platform history, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. This is a solid compliance and platform credibility foundation. However, the data does not provide evidence of internationally recognized management certifications, product certifications, or detailed factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indicator. As a result, the supplier is credible but not at the highest certification level.
Final Score
17 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
- Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥405.6K+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 30+
Elaboration
The supplier has generated more than 100 orders and over CN¥405.6K in transaction value within the past six months. This indicates active commercial activity and a measurable transaction record. The 4.9 store rating is strong, while the 30+ reviews provide some customer feedback base, though the review volume is not large enough to represent extensive market validation.
Scoring Rationale
The business data shows stable recent activity, good customer rating, and moderate order volume. The transaction amount is meaningful but not high enough to indicate a large-scale commercial supplier. The review count supports basic buyer validation but remains relatively limited. Overall, this points to a supplier with proven but medium-level business performance.
Final Score
16 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Platform labels: Full customization, ODM service available, Minor customization
Elaboration
The supplier shows a response time of no more than 2 hours, which is acceptable for international online sourcing. The availability of Full Customization, ODM service, and Minor Customization suggests the company can support different levels of buyer-specific product or specification adjustment, based on the platform labels provided.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has clear customization capability indicators and a reasonably fast response time. However, the highest service score range requires response time of one hour or less, while the provided data only confirms response within two hours. Therefore, the supplier demonstrates strong but not top-tier service capability.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 98.4%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 98.4%, which is significantly above the 90% threshold for strong delivery performance. This indicates that, based on the available platform data, the supplier has a reliable record of fulfilling orders within expected shipping timelines.
Scoring Rationale
A 98.4% on-time delivery rate falls into the highest scoring range. This is one of the supplier’s strongest performance indicators and suggests low delivery-delay risk based on the disclosed data.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 30+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9 and more than 30 reviews, indicating generally positive customer feedback. Verified supplier status adds some assurance regarding company legitimacy. However, the data does not confirm whether Finished Product Inspection is available, nor does it provide detailed information about quality control procedures, inspection standards, defect rates, product testing, or certification-backed quality systems.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier’s customer rating is strong, and the review base provides useful but limited feedback. The verified supplier status supports baseline credibility, but the absence of disclosed Finished Product Inspection and detailed quality assurance information prevents a higher score. The quality profile is positive but not fully substantiated by formal inspection or quality-system data.
Final Score
15 / 20
Total Score
78 / 100
- Company Strength: 12 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 17 / 20
- Business Performance: 16 / 20
- Service Capability: 8 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 15 / 20
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is recommended with moderate confidence, especially for buyers seeking pneumatic components with flexible MOQ options, customization support, and reliable delivery performance. The supplier appears suitable for small-to-medium-volume procurement, trial orders, customized pneumatic parts sourcing, and buyers who prefer Trade Assurance protection.
Key strengths include 5 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, strong on-time delivery performance, fast response within 2 hours, and a high 4.9 store rating. The main risks are the relatively small factory scale, limited employee base, modest review volume, and insufficient disclosed data on Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory audit scope, product certifications, or formal quality management systems.
A prudent procurement approach would be to start with sample orders or small batch orders, verify product specifications directly, request inspection records if available, and confirm customization requirements before scaling order volume. The supplier shows growth potential due to active transaction performance, customization labels, and strong delivery reliability, but should be further validated for large-volume or quality-critical procurement.
Leave your comment