Yantai Risenow Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Yantai Risenow Industry and Trade Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of 7,400+㎡ and 60+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-to-medium manufacturing supplier focused on PVC and TPU waterproof apron products, including adjustable, thickened, large-size, and food-grade apron options. The supplier has factory verification, Gold Supplier status for 1 year, Trade Assurance support, and platform labels such as Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, and low MOQ for customization. Its commercial performance is still limited, with 10+ orders and CN¥47.3K+ transaction value over the past six months, while customer review volume is currently 0 and shop rating data is unavailable. The supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ waterproof apron sourcing, sample testing, ODM-supported customization, or early-stage supplier development. However, buyers requiring mature customer feedback, high transaction validation, or proven large-volume export performance should proceed with additional due diligence.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 7,400+㎡
- Employees: 60+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Shandong, China

Elaboration:
The supplier has a reported physical production base of over 7,400㎡ and more than 60 employees, which indicates a defined manufacturing operation rather than a purely trading-oriented profile based on the available data. The presence of factory verification strengthens the credibility of its production setup. However, the employee count suggests a small-to-medium operational scale rather than a large-scale industrial supplier.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates basic-to-moderate production capacity with a measurable factory area and staff base. Factory verification provides additional confidence, but the scale does not support classification as a large-scale stable supply chain. The available data is sufficient to place it in the medium-stable factory range, though not at the upper end due to limited evidence of large production scale.

Final Score: 15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier years: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: Low MOQ for customization, Finished product inspection, ODM service available
- Factory / supplier verification: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and factory verification. The certification labels also show relevant operational support, particularly inspection and ODM service. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits the strength of long-term platform credibility.

Scoring Rationale:
Core platform protections are present, including Trade Assurance and verified supplier status. The supplier also has relevant platform labels supporting inspection and customization capability. The short Gold Supplier tenure prevents it from reaching the highest credibility tier, but the overall compliance and platform structure is relatively complete for a newer supplier.

Final Score: 16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥47.3K+
- Shop rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration:
The supplier has recorded recent platform transactions, but the commercial scale remains limited. A six-month order count of 10+ and transaction value of CN¥47.3K+ indicate active sales activity, yet not strong enough to prove high-volume purchasing demand. The lack of shop rating data and zero customer reviews reduce the strength of market validation.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has some transaction history, which is better than having no commercial record. However, order volume, transaction amount, and customer feedback are all limited. The absence of shop rating and review-based validation makes it difficult to assess repeat buyer satisfaction or broader market acceptance.

Final Score: 11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: ≤1h
- Customization-related label: Low MOQ for customization
- ODM service available: True
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier shows strong communication responsiveness, with a response time of less than or equal to one hour. Platform labels indicate low MOQ customization and ODM service availability, suggesting the supplier can support some level of customized purchasing or product development. However, Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed in the provided data.

Scoring Rationale:
Fast response speed is a clear service advantage. The presence of ODM service and low-MOQ customization labels supports a relatively capable service profile. Since Full Customization is not confirmed, the supplier should not receive the maximum score, but the available data still supports an above-average service capability assessment.

Final Score: 8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is the strongest delivery indicator provided. This suggests that, based on available platform data, the supplier has fulfilled orders within the expected delivery timeline.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. A 100.0% rate supports a top-tier score. However, given the relatively low order count, the result is positive but should still be interpreted alongside the limited transaction base.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Finished Product Inspection: True
- Factory Verification: True
- Shop rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration:
The supplier has two relevant quality-related indicators: Finished Product Inspection and Factory Verification. These provide some assurance that inspection and supplier verification mechanisms exist. However, the absence of shop rating data and the lack of customer reviews significantly weaken the ability to evaluate actual buyer satisfaction or product consistency after delivery.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has basic quality assurance indicators, which supports a moderate score. Nevertheless, quality feedback from customers is currently insufficient, with zero reviews and no available shop rating. This prevents the supplier from being classified as having strong customer-validated quality performance.

Final Score: 13 / 20

Total Score

73 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for buyers seeking PVC or TPU waterproof aprons with low MOQ options, ODM support, and fast supplier communication. The supplier appears suitable for sample orders, small-batch procurement, early-stage private-label testing, or buyers who can conduct their own product inspection before scaling.

Main risks include limited transaction volume, zero customer reviews, unavailable shop rating, and only 1 year of Gold Supplier history. These factors reduce commercial validation and make large-volume procurement less advisable without further verification.

The supplier’s growth potential is moderate, supported by factory verification, Finished Product Inspection, Trade Assurance, fast response time, and 100.0% on-time delivery. A prudent procurement approach would be to begin with sample testing or a pilot order before considering larger-volume cooperation.