Zhejiang Ama Sport Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Zhejiang Ama Sport Goods Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 9,800+ m² and 150+ staff. The company presents a moderate-to-strong manufacturing profile supported by verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 4 years, Trade Assurance, and platform tags including low MOQ customization, response time ≤6h, and on-time delivery of 97.0%. Its recent business performance is comparatively solid, with 500+ orders and CN¥878.9K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 100+ reviews. Based on the available product data, the supplier offers custom logo 60mm high bounce hollow products with MOQ of 1,000 pieces. It appears suitable for buyers seeking mid-volume customized sporting goods procurement with platform-backed transaction protection. However, data is insufficient regarding full customization capability, finished product inspection, specific factory audit details, export markets, certifications, and customer portfolio.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 9,800+ m²
- Employees: 150+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China

Elaboration:
The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base and workforce size. A factory area of 9,800+ m² and 150+ staff indicate a meaningful production setup rather than a very small workshop. The verified supplier status provides additional credibility that the company has undergone some level of supplier verification on the platform. However, the data does not provide detailed production lines, monthly capacity, equipment list, or specific factory audit report content.

Scoring Rationale:
The company appears to be a stable mid-sized manufacturer with sufficient staff and facility scale to support regular production. The available data supports stronger-than-basic production capability, but the absence of detailed capacity figures and factory certification documentation prevents classification as a large-scale, fully validated supply chain.

Final Score: 16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Platform tags: Low MOQ for customization, Response time ≤6h, On-time delivery 97.0%
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. Four years as a Gold Supplier suggests a reasonable operating history on the platform, though it is not exceptionally long. The listed platform tags also support basic operational transparency, particularly regarding delivery and customization-related positioning.

Scoring Rationale:
Core platform protections and credibility signals are present, making the supplier relatively trustworthy from a platform compliance perspective. However, the Gold Supplier history is moderate rather than long-term, and no independent industry certifications or detailed compliance certificates are provided in the dataset.

Final Score: 16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 500+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥878.9K+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 100+

Elaboration:
The supplier shows active recent commercial performance, with over 500 orders in six months and transaction value exceeding CN¥878.9K. The store rating of 4.7 is positive, and 100+ reviews provide a reasonable feedback base. These indicators suggest that the supplier has real transaction activity and is not commercially unproven.

Scoring Rationale:
The order volume is strong, while the transaction amount is solid but not enough to confirm very large-scale commercial throughput. The 4.7 rating is favorable, and the review count gives the score meaningful support. Overall, the supplier demonstrates stable business validation, though not enough evidence is provided to classify it as a top-tier high-volume trader.

Final Score: 17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤6h
- Platform tag: Low MOQ for customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of ≤6h indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. The “Low MOQ for customization” tag suggests some customization support, and the listed product is described as a custom logo product. However, the data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates basic-to-moderate service capability through timely response and customization-related platform labeling. Because response time is not within the highest service band and full customization is not confirmed, the service score should remain in the normal but not premium range.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 97.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 97.0%, which is above the 90% threshold for strong delivery performance. This indicates that, based on platform data, the supplier has a strong record of meeting shipment timelines.

Scoring Rationale:
A 97.0% on-time delivery rate supports a high delivery score. Since the figure is clearly above 90%, the supplier qualifies for the top delivery performance range. No additional shipment lead time or logistics data is provided, so the score is strong but not perfect.

Final Score: 9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 100+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier stated as True, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier has a positive customer feedback profile, with a 4.7 rating and more than 100 reviews. This provides a useful indication of customer satisfaction and transaction reliability. Verified supplier status adds credibility, but the dataset does not confirm Finished Product Inspection or provide detailed factory verification documents, quality control process descriptions, defect rates, or third-party inspection records.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has good customer feedback and a meaningful review base, which supports a favorable quality assessment. However, the absence of explicit Finished Product Inspection data and detailed factory quality verification limits the ability to assign a top-tier quality score.

Final Score: 15 / 20

Total Score

80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled initial procurement. Zhejiang Ama Sport Goods Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking customized sporting goods products, moderate MOQ orders, and platform-protected transactions through Trade Assurance. The supplier is especially relevant for small-to-mid-sized importers, promotional product buyers, and buyers needing custom logo products with relatively stable delivery performance.

Key risks include insufficient data on full customization capability, finished product inspection, detailed factory audit scope, production capacity, product certifications, and quality control procedures. The supplier’s growth potential is supported by its active six-month order volume, positive rating, verified supplier status, and strong 97.0% on-time delivery rate. For larger or quality-sensitive orders, buyers should request samples, confirm inspection procedures, clarify customization scope, and obtain any available factory or product certification documents before scaling procurement.