Zhejiang Fele Sports Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Zhejiang Fele Sports Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 31,000+ m² and 130+ staff. Based on the provided product listings, the company focuses on compression gloves, copper-infused arthritis gloves, fitness gloves, and weight lifting gym gloves, with MOQs ranging from 300 to 500 pairs. The supplier shows strong platform credibility through 10 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. Its recent business performance is also solid, with 100+ orders and CN¥6.6M+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 100+ reviews. Delivery reliability is particularly strong, with a reported 100.0% on-time shipment rate. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking stable glove-category sourcing with proven platform transaction history, especially medium-sized distributors, e-commerce sellers, and procurement teams requiring verified suppliers. Key data gaps remain around customization capability and finished product inspection.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory area: 31,000+ m²
- Employees: 130+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory province: Zhejiang, China
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a relatively solid physical operating base, with a factory area exceeding 31,000 m² and a workforce of more than 130 staff. This indicates more than a small workshop-level operation and suggests the company has a meaningful production footprint for glove-related products. The verified supplier status further supports the credibility of its operational presence.
Scoring Rationale
The factory scale is strong in terms of area, while the employee count indicates a medium-sized manufacturing organization rather than a very large industrial producer. The presence of supplier verification strengthens confidence in the company’s operational legitimacy. However, the provided data does not include detailed production lines, monthly capacity, equipment information, or factory audit reports, so a maximum score is not justified.
Final Score
17 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 10 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry label: “Response time ≤3h”
Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform profile, including 10 years as a Gold Supplier and support for Trade Assurance. These are important indicators for procurement risk reduction, especially for buyers relying on ’s transaction and dispute-handling mechanisms. The verified supplier status further improves credibility.
Scoring Rationale
A 10-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, and supplier verification represent a strong platform-backed credibility structure. However, the provided certification or industry label information is limited to response time and does not include product certifications, factory audit certificates, compliance standards, or industry-specific quality certifications. Therefore, the score is high but not at the full 18–20 level.
Final Score
17 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Past 6-month orders: 100+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥6.6M+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 100+
Elaboration
The supplier has demonstrated active transaction performance over the past six months, with more than 100 orders and transaction value exceeding CN¥6.6M. The 4.9 store rating and 100+ reviews indicate positive customer reception and a meaningful level of buyer validation on the platform.
Scoring Rationale
The order volume, transaction value, and rating profile all point to a commercially active and relatively well-validated supplier. The 4.9 rating is strong, and the review count provides more confidence than suppliers with limited feedback. However, the data does not specify repeat purchase rate, buyer geography, customer segments, or order distribution, so the score remains slightly below the highest range.
Final Score
18 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within three hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international sourcing inquiries. This is suitable for routine quotation, sample discussion, and order coordination. However, there is no provided evidence confirming full customization capability, such as OEM/ODM support, private labeling, packaging customization, or design development services.
Scoring Rationale
The response time is good but not within the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since customization capability is not provided, the service profile cannot be assessed as strong customization-ready. The supplier appears to offer normal communication responsiveness, but the lack of customization data limits the score.
Final Score
7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time shipment rate: 100.0%
Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time shipment rate, which is the strongest available delivery indicator in the provided dataset. For procurement teams, this suggests dependable dispatch performance and lower risk of shipment delays based on the platform metric.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. A 100.0% rate supports the highest score within this dimension. No negative delivery indicators were provided.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 100+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True, based on verified supplier status
Elaboration
The supplier has a strong customer feedback profile, with a 4.9 rating and more than 100 reviews. This indicates generally positive buyer satisfaction and provides a reasonable level of quality-related confidence from transaction history. Verified supplier status also supports basic credibility regarding the company’s existence and operating profile.
Scoring Rationale
The high rating and review count are positive quality indicators, and verified supplier status adds confidence. However, there is no explicit data confirming Finished Product Inspection or detailed quality control systems. Because inspection mechanisms and formal quality certifications are not provided, the supplier cannot be rated at the highest level for quality assurance despite strong feedback metrics.
Final Score
16 / 20
Total Score
85 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is recommended, especially for buyers sourcing compression gloves, copper-infused arthritis gloves, fitness gloves, and weight lifting gloves with moderate MOQs of 300–500 pairs. The supplier is most suitable for e-commerce sellers, distributors, and procurement teams that prioritize transaction credibility, stable delivery performance, and proven recent sales activity.
Main risks include insufficient data on full customization capability, finished product inspection, detailed quality control systems, and formal product or factory certifications beyond platform verification. Growth potential appears positive based on its 10-year Gold Supplier history, 31,000+ m² factory scale, CN¥6.6M+ recent transaction value, strong 4.9 rating, and 100.0% on-time shipment performance.
Leave your comment