Jinhua Aubaiwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Jinhua Aubaiwei Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, offering household, tabletop, portable, wall-mounted, and large foldable ironing boards. Based on the provided data, the company has a factory area of over 4,100㎡ and more than 40 staff, indicating a small-to-medium production setup with basic manufacturing capability. The supplier is listed as a Gold Supplier for 2 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier, which provides a moderate level of platform credibility. Its recent business performance shows 30+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.6 store rating but only 10 reviews. Service capability is acceptable, with response time within 2 hours and Full Customization listed. However, the major concern is delivery reliability, as the on-time delivery rate is only 48.5%. This supplier may be suitable for small-batch buyers, trial orders, and customized ironing board sourcing, but delivery risk should be carefully managed.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 4,100+㎡
- Employees: 40+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope: Multiple ironing board models listed

Elaboration:
The supplier has a physical factory scale above 4,100㎡ and a workforce of more than 40 employees. This suggests it has basic in-house production capacity rather than operating only as a trading entity. The listed product portfolio focuses on ironing boards, including home folding, tabletop, portable, hotel wall-mounted, and large foldable types, showing a relatively focused product category.

Scoring Rationale:
The company does not show evidence of a large-scale workforce or very large production base, but the available factory size, staff count, and verified supplier status indicate a functioning small-to-medium manufacturing operation. The data supports basic production stability, though not enough to classify it as a large-scale supply chain.

Final Score: 14/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification/industry tags: ODM service available, Full customization, Response time ≤2h, On-time delivery 48.5%

Elaboration:
The supplier has core platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance support. The 2-year Gold Supplier history provides some platform track record, though it is still relatively short. The verified supplier status improves credibility, while ODM and customization tags show platform-recognized service positioning.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has several important platform trust elements, but the Gold Supplier duration is limited to 2 years and the provided certification/tag information does not include broader third-party product certifications. Therefore, credibility is solid at a basic-to-moderate level, but not strong enough for a top-tier compliance score.

Final Score: 15/20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Past 6-month orders: 30+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: 4.6
- Review count: 10

Elaboration:
The supplier has demonstrated actual recent platform transactions, with more than 30 orders and over CN¥67.6K in transaction value during the past six months. The store rating of 4.6 is positive, but the review count of 10 is relatively limited, meaning customer feedback volume is not yet strong.

Scoring Rationale:
The business data confirms commercial activity and some buyer acceptance, but the order volume and transaction value remain moderate-to-low compared with highly validated suppliers. The 4.6 rating supports acceptable customer satisfaction, while the limited number of reviews restricts confidence in long-term performance consistency.

Final Score: 13/20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: ≤2h
- Full customization: Listed
- ODM service available: Listed

Elaboration:
The supplier provides a response time within 2 hours, which is reasonably efficient for buyer communication. Full Customization and ODM service availability indicate that the supplier can support some degree of customized product development or buyer-specific requirements.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier does not meet the strongest response benchmark of ≤1 hour, but ≤2 hours is still commercially acceptable. The presence of Full Customization and ODM service strengthens the service profile, making it suitable for buyers requiring customized ironing board specifications within a controlled sourcing process.

Final Score: 8/10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 48.5%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s delivery performance is the weakest area in the provided dataset. An on-time delivery rate of 48.5% is significantly below the 70% threshold and indicates that late shipment risk is material.

Scoring Rationale:
Based on the required scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate below 70% should receive fewer than 5 points. Since 48.5% is well below that level, this creates a major procurement concern, especially for buyers with fixed launch dates, seasonal sales windows, or strict replenishment schedules.

Final Score: 3/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.6
- Review count: 10
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier marked as True

Elaboration:
The store rating of 4.6 suggests generally positive customer feedback, but the review base is small at only 10 reviews. Verified supplier status provides some quality and operational credibility, but the provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection or specific product quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The rating is favorable, but the low review count limits statistical confidence. The supplier has some verification support, yet the absence of Finished Product Inspection data prevents a stronger quality assurance assessment. Overall, quality feedback is acceptable but not deeply validated.

Final Score: 13/20

Total Score

66/100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small-batch sourcing, trial orders, customized ironing board projects, and buyers who can tolerate delivery uncertainty. The supplier shows reasonable platform credibility, basic factory capability, and acceptable service responsiveness. However, the key risk is the very low on-time delivery rate of 48.5%, which makes it unsuitable for urgent, time-sensitive, or large-scale replenishment programs without strict delivery controls. Buyers should start with low-volume trial orders, confirm lead times in writing, use Trade Assurance, and monitor delivery performance before scaling purchases. Its growth potential lies in focused ironing board production, customization capability, and improving operational delivery reliability.