zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Union Timmy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

18.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Union Timmy Technology Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based verified supplier focused on time attendance, biometric time clock, date/time stamp, and related electronic recording devices. Based on the provided data, the company shows a stable mid-sized operating profile, with a factory area of 1,800+㎡ and 70+ staff. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 11 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, factory verification, Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, ODM service, and minor customization labels. Commercial performance is also solid, with 500+ orders and CN¥25M+ transaction value over the past six months. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ sourcing, verified platform protection, and established transaction history in time attendance or biometric recording equipment. Key limitations include limited available data on full customization capability, detailed production capacity, export markets, and customer segmentation. Overall, this supplier is a credible medium-scale sourcing option with strong platform validation and good delivery reliability.

Shenzhen Union Timmy Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Country/Region: China, Guangdong
  • Factory area: 1,800+㎡
  • Employees: 70+ staff
  • Verified supplier/factory status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a disclosed physical manufacturing or operating base with 1,800+㎡ of factory area and more than 70 employees. This indicates a meaningful operational setup rather than a purely trading-style profile. The presence of verified supplier status further strengthens confidence that the company has passed some form of platform or supplier verification.

However, the available data does not include detailed annual production capacity, number of production lines, equipment lists, warehouse scale, R&D team size, or factory audit reports. Therefore, while the company demonstrates a stable mid-sized foundation, there is insufficient evidence to classify it as a large-scale manufacturing supplier.

Scoring Rationale

The company fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory. Its factory size and staffing level are adequate for regular supply, especially for electronic attendance and time-recording devices, but the data does not prove large-scale production capability. Verified supplier status improves confidence, but the absence of deeper factory audit details limits the score from reaching the top range.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 11 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification/industry labels: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Minor customization
  • Verified supplier/factory status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong credibility profile. An 11-year Gold Supplier history indicates long-term platform presence, while Trade Assurance provides buyers with transaction protection. The company also carries several relevant platform labels, including warranty availability and Finished Product Inspection, which support procurement confidence.

ODM service and minor customization labels suggest some level of product adaptation capability, although the data does not confirm full customization. The combination of long platform history, transaction protection, verification, and quality-related labels makes the supplier relatively credible from a compliance and platform-trust perspective.

Scoring Rationale

This is one of the supplier’s strongest areas. The 11-year Gold Supplier duration, Trade Assurance support, verified status, and multiple compliance-related labels represent a mature platform credibility structure. The only reason the score is not full is that the provided data does not include third-party certifications, detailed audit reports, or internationally recognized product compliance certificates.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in past six months: 500+
  • Transaction value in past six months: CN¥25M+
  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Reviews: 40+

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong recent commercial activity. More than 500 orders and CN¥25M+ in transaction value over six months indicate active buyer demand and meaningful sales conversion. This level of transaction volume provides stronger commercial validation than suppliers with only limited or unproven platform activity.

The store rating of 4.6 is positive, though not at the very top tier. The review count of 40+ provides some customer feedback basis, but it is not especially large relative to the high order volume. This suggests that commercial performance is strong, while public review depth is moderate.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a high score due to substantial six-month order quantity and transaction value. These figures show that buyers are actively placing orders and that the supplier has demonstrated recent commercial execution. The score is slightly moderated because the store rating is good rather than exceptional, and the number of reviews is relatively limited compared with the order count.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤4h
  • ODM service available
  • Minor customization available
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤4 hours is acceptable for international sourcing communication, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour. The platform labels indicate ODM service and minor customization, which suggest the supplier can support certain product adaptation needs.

However, the provided data does not confirm Full Customization capability. There is also no information on multilingual sales support, technical support team size, after-sales process, sample lead time, or dedicated account management. As a result, the service capability appears functional and commercially usable, but not clearly advanced.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows adequate service capability through reasonable response speed and available ODM/minor customization labels. However, because the response time is up to four hours and Full Customization is not confirmed, it should not be scored in the highest range. The available evidence supports a solid but not premium service capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 91.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 91.9% is above the 90% benchmark, indicating strong delivery reliability based on the provided data. This suggests that the supplier is generally capable of meeting agreed shipment schedules and maintaining operational discipline in order fulfillment.

No additional details are provided regarding average lead time, peak-season capacity, logistics partners, shipping destinations, or delay dispute history. Therefore, the score should be based strictly on the disclosed on-time delivery percentage.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. At 91.9%, the supplier meets the threshold for strong delivery performance, although the margin above 90% is not extremely high. Therefore, a high but not maximum score is appropriate.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Reviews: 40+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Factory Verification: True
  • Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration

The supplier has several quality-related trust indicators. Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability suggest that some post-production quality control and buyer protection mechanisms are in place. Factory verification also adds confidence that the supplier has undergone platform-level validation.

Customer feedback is positive with a 4.6 store rating, but the review count of 40+ is moderate rather than extensive. The data does not include defect rates, product test reports, return rates, quality certifications, inspection standards, or detailed customer complaint records. Therefore, quality confidence is reasonable, but not comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a good quality profile supported by a positive rating, finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified factory status. However, the score is limited by the moderate review volume and lack of deeper quality documentation. The supplier appears reliable enough for standard procurement, but additional sample testing or pre-shipment inspection would still be advisable for larger orders.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 84 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation with controlled qualification checks.

Shenzhen Union Timmy Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking verified sourcing of time attendance machines, biometric time clocks, date/time stamp machines, and related electronic recording products with low MOQ flexibility. The supplier is especially suitable for small to medium-sized importers, distributors, online sellers, and project buyers who value Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and recent transaction performance.

Main risks include insufficient disclosed data on full customization capability, detailed production capacity, international certifications, product compliance documentation, and large-scale quality records. For bulk procurement, buyers should request product samples, confirm inspection standards, verify warranty terms, and use Trade Assurance or pre-shipment inspection.

Overall, the supplier shows strong platform credibility, solid recent business performance, and good delivery reliability. Its growth potential appears positive within its current product category, provided it can further strengthen documentation, customization transparency, and quality evidence.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Lihua Textile Union Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lihua Textile Union Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Union Protection Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Union Protection Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Huayi Union Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Huayi Union Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Union Crafts Manufacturing Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Union Crafts Manufacturing Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Henan Union Coding Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Union Coding Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen A-R Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen A-R Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jinchenyu Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jinchenyu Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shengdiou Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shengdiou Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Transcold Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Transcold Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Poweryear Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Poweryear Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Eta Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Eta Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guotong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guotong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhonghesheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhonghesheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Hi-Tech Zone Embody Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Hi-Tech Zone Embody Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shandong Storike Engineering Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Storike Engineering Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shunri Garment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shunri Garment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Zhongqi Lian (Sichuan) Coating Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongqi Lian (Sichuan) Coating Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Tongda Jiean Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Tongda Jiean Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Honghaosheng Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Honghaosheng Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaocheng Jinyuyuan Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaocheng Jinyuyuan Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Xinhe Stainless Steel Products Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Xinhe Stainless Steel Products Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gnee Tianjin Group Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Gnee Tianjin Group Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Qianlv Scarf Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Qianlv Scarf Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fafaliang Packaging Materials (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fafaliang Packaging Materials (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Shuailing Paper Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Shuailing Paper Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Guose Modular Construction Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Guose Modular Construction Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Jingjinbao Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Jingjinbao Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Longfly Tech. (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Longfly Tech. (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Zhihong Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Zhihong Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai  Etravel Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Etravel Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Jinhang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Jinhang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongying Besco Machine Tool Limited Supplier Evaluation
Dongying Besco Machine Tool Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Gales Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Gales Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Vivistar Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Vivistar Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026