zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Wedoinnov Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

18.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Wedoinnov Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based supplier focused on video conferencing and AI camera-related products, including AI face tracking video conferencing devices, live cameras, 2K/4K camera products, and USB EPTZ auto-tracking video equipment. Based on the available data, the company operates with a factory area of over 1,700㎡ and more than 40 staff, indicating a small-to-medium production scale with basic manufacturing capability. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 9 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, factory supplier verification, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, warranty availability, and minor customization tags. Business activity appears moderate, with 60+ orders and CN¥3.6M+ transaction value in the past six months, though the review base remains limited at 10+ reviews. This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ camera and video conferencing products, especially those requiring ODM or minor customization, but buyers should further verify capacity, quality consistency, and customization depth before placing large-scale orders.

Shenzhen Wedoinnov Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
Factory area: 1,700+㎡; employees: 40+ staff; verified supplier/factory status: True.

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical production base in Guangdong and a workforce of over 40 staff. This indicates that the company has an operational manufacturing setup rather than being only a trading entity, especially given the verified supplier status. However, the factory area and employee scale are not large compared with higher-capacity industrial manufacturers.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic and credible production capability, supported by factory verification. However, the available scale indicators suggest a small-to-medium operation rather than a large-scale supply chain platform. There is no additional data on production lines, monthly output, automation level, or capacity utilization.

Final Score
13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
Gold Supplier: True; Gold Supplier duration: 9 years; Trade Assurance: True; certification/industry tags include Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, and Minor customization.

Elaboration
A 9-year Gold Supplier history provides a strong platform credibility signal. Trade Assurance improves transaction protection, while Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability strengthen buyer confidence. Factory verification further supports supplier legitimacy. However, no formal product certifications, management system certifications, or international compliance certificates are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a relatively complete platform credibility profile, including long-term Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, factory verification, and inspection-related tags. The score is not maximized because certification data beyond platform and inspection labels is insufficient.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
Past six-month orders: 60+; past six-month transaction value: CN¥3.6M+; store rating: 4.6; reviews: 10+.

Elaboration
The company shows measurable recent transaction activity, with more than 60 orders and transaction value above CN¥3.6M over six months. This suggests active market participation and some buyer acceptance. The 4.6 store rating is positive, but the review count of 10+ is relatively limited, reducing the statistical strength of customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale
Business performance is moderate to good. Transaction value is meaningful, and order volume is stable, but the limited number of reviews prevents stronger validation of long-term customer satisfaction. The available data supports a mid-level commercial performance assessment rather than a top-tier score.

Final Score
16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
Communication response time: ≤5h; available tags: ODM service available and Minor customization. Full Customization: Insufficient Data.

Elaboration
The response time of within five hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the highest benchmark of response within one hour. The supplier supports ODM service and minor customization, which suggests some flexibility in product adaptation. However, there is no confirmed data showing Full Customization capability.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier appears capable of handling standard inquiries and limited customization requirements. The absence of confirmed Full Customization and the response time being longer than one hour place the supplier in the normal service-capability range rather than the high-performance category.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
On-time dispatch rate: 85.7%.

Elaboration
An 85.7% on-time dispatch rate indicates generally acceptable delivery execution, but it is below the 90% threshold associated with stronger delivery reliability. Buyers may still experience occasional shipment delays based on this performance level.

Scoring Rationale
According to the provided scoring framework, an on-time dispatch rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. Since 85.7% is in the middle-to-upper part of this range, the supplier receives a solid but not excellent delivery score.

Final Score
8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
Store rating: 4.6; reviews: 10+; Finished Product Inspection: available; Factory Verification: True.

Elaboration
The supplier has a favorable rating of 4.6 and supports Finished Product Inspection, which provides a basic quality-control signal. Factory verification also improves confidence in operational legitimacy. However, the review count is relatively low, and there is no data on defect rates, inspection standards, product certifications, or after-sales claim history.

Scoring Rationale
Quality assurance indicators are present, particularly Finished Product Inspection and factory verification. The rating is positive, but the limited review base weakens the reliability of customer feedback. The supplier therefore fits the “good rating with basic quality assurance” category rather than the highest quality-confidence tier.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

77 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order sizing and proper pre-shipment verification. Shenzhen Wedoinnov Co., Ltd. is suitable for small-to-medium buyers, online sellers, distributors, and project-based purchasers seeking video conferencing or AI camera products with low MOQ, ODM service, and minor customization support. The main risks are limited factory scale, relatively low review volume, no confirmed Full Customization capability, and delivery performance below 90%. Its growth potential lies in its 9-year platform history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, CN¥3.6M+ recent transaction value, and inspection-related quality safeguards. For larger or long-term procurement, buyers should request samples, confirm production capacity, verify quality-control procedures, and clarify customization scope before bulk purchasing.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen A-R Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen A-R Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jillion Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jillion Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Owire Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Owire Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Vsndt Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Vsndt Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Y&J Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Y&J Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Dwell Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Dwell Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bescanled Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bescanled Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Blueendless Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Blueendless Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Greentech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Greentech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Aome Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Aome Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jinchenyu Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jinchenyu Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mufeng Paper Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mufeng Paper Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hxs Electronics Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hxs Electronics Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Runxing Printing Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Runxing Printing Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Eigday Heating Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Eigday Heating Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Dapu Machinery Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Dapu Machinery Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Jiangsu Luoming Purification Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Luoming Purification Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Desaifu Precision Measuring Instrument (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Desaifu Precision Measuring Instrument (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaocheng Youqian Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaocheng Youqian Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinzhou Jetech Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinzhou Jetech Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Huizhong Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Huizhong Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinji Weiwei Textile Factory Supplier Evaluation
Xinji Weiwei Textile Factory Supplier Evaluation
Agrok Netting Cooperative (Wudi) Supplier Evaluation
Agrok Netting Cooperative (Wudi) Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Leago Sporting Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Leago Sporting Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Naisen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Naisen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bluesun Solar Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bluesun Solar Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Aojuelei Import And Export (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Aojuelei Import And Export (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Meiyan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Meiyan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Beleqi Amusement Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Beleqi Amusement Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Haiwen Membrane Switch Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Haiwen Membrane Switch Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Tonghong Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Tonghong Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linhai Greenwood Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linhai Greenwood Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jojo Craft And Art Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jojo Craft And Art Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Aiduoduo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Aiduoduo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jilin Province Lu E Niang Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jilin Province Lu E Niang Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Chenran Packaging Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Chenran Packaging Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026