Yantai Fushun Pu Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

YANTAI FUSHUN PU PRODUCTS CO., LTD. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, focused on PU and rubber-related industrial products such as PU guide wheels, rubber parking products, urethane wheel chocks, PU sheets, and rubber sheets. Based on the provided data, the supplier operates from a factory area of over 3,200 m² with more than 20 staff and has been identified as a verified supplier. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility and transaction validation: it has 18 years as an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, reports 100+ orders and CN¥3.7M+ transaction value in the past six months, and maintains a 4.9 store rating with 40+ reviews. Delivery performance is also strong, with a stated 100.0% on-time delivery rate. However, company scale appears relatively small, and data on Full Customization capability and Finished Product Inspection is insufficient. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking verified, transaction-proven PU/rubber products with low MOQ and reliable delivery.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company: YANTAI FUSHUN PU PRODUCTS CO., LTD.
• Location: Shandong, China
• Factory area: 3,200+ m²
• Employees: 20+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical factory base of more than 3,200 m² and a workforce of more than 20 staff. This indicates that the company has an established production site and a basic operational team rather than functioning only as a trading storefront. The verified supplier status also adds credibility to the existence and operating condition of the company.

However, the provided employee count and factory area suggest a relatively small to lower-medium production scale. There is no additional data on annual production capacity, number of production lines, machinery, export volume, warehouse size, or specific factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic manufacturing capability and verified factory presence, which supports confidence in its operational foundation. However, compared with larger industrial suppliers, the scale is limited based on the available data: 20+ employees and 3,200+ m² do not indicate a large-scale supply chain. Because there is no evidence of extensive production capacity, large workforce, or detailed factory certification, the score should remain within the “small but with basic production capability” range.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 18 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Platform tags: “Response time ≤1h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”

Elaboration

The supplier has a long Gold Supplier history of 18 years, which is a significant platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance availability provides buyers with additional transaction protection through the platform. The verified supplier status further strengthens the reliability of the company’s platform profile.

The listed platform tags also show operational performance indicators, including fast response and complete on-time delivery. However, the data does not provide additional third-party management system certifications, product compliance certifications, or industry-specific certificates. Therefore, while platform credibility is strong, broader compliance documentation is not fully demonstrated in the provided dataset.

Scoring Rationale

An 18-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status together represent a strong and long-term platform trust profile. These are meaningful indicators for procurement risk reduction, especially for buyers sourcing through . The score is not a full 20 because the provided certification/industry labels are limited to response and delivery performance, and there is insufficient data on formal product or factory compliance certifications beyond platform verification.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 100+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥3.7M+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Review count: 40+

Elaboration

The supplier shows clear recent commercial activity. More than 100 orders in the past six months indicates active market demand, while CN¥3.7M+ in transaction value suggests that the supplier is not only receiving small sample-level orders but also meaningful transaction volume. A 4.9 store rating is strong, and 40+ reviews provide some level of customer feedback validation.

The business data supports the view that the supplier has an active and commercially proven operation. However, the review count, while useful, is not extremely large. There is also no breakdown by repeat buyers, export destinations, key customers, or order categories, so deeper business stability cannot be fully assessed.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 100+ recent orders, CN¥3.7M+ transaction value, and a 4.9 rating supports a strong business performance score. The supplier appears to have solid transaction momentum and customer acceptance. The score is slightly below maximum because the review volume is moderate rather than extensive, and there is insufficient data on repeat purchase rate, buyer distribution, or long-term order consistency outside the past six months.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤1h
• Platform tag: “Response time ≤1h”
• Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong communication responsiveness, with a response time of less than or equal to one hour. This is a positive indicator for inquiry handling, quotation speed, order communication, and issue resolution. Fast response is particularly valuable for international buyers managing time-sensitive sourcing processes.

The product list includes an item described as “Customized 90A Pu Guide Flying Wheel,” but the provided data does not explicitly confirm a platform-level “Full Customization” capability. Therefore, customization capability cannot be fully assessed beyond the existence of at least one customized product listing.

Scoring Rationale

The response time performance supports a high service score. However, because Full Customization capability is not clearly confirmed in the provided supplier service data, the supplier should not receive the maximum score. The available evidence supports strong communication efficiency but only limited confirmation of broader customization service capability.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery performance indicator provided. This suggests that recent orders tracked by the platform were fulfilled within the promised shipment timeline.

No additional data is provided on average lead time, production cycle, logistics method, urgent order handling, or delivery performance by destination. Therefore, the assessment is based strictly on the stated on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. A 100.0% rate supports the maximum score within this dimension. While more logistics details would be useful for deeper procurement planning, the available delivery metric is excellent.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Review count: 40+
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided as True

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which indicates positive buyer feedback. The 40+ reviews provide a reasonable but not large base of customer evaluation. Verified supplier status also supports a certain level of confidence in the company’s operating legitimacy.

However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection procedures, formal quality management certifications, product testing reports, or specific inspection standards. Therefore, while customer feedback is positive, the quality assurance system is only partially visible from the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a good score because of its high rating, existing review base, and verified supplier status. However, it should not be rated in the highest range because there is insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection and formal quality control systems. The rating and reviews support customer satisfaction, but the quality assurance framework is not fully documented.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation with controlled qualification checks.

YANTAI FUSHUN PU PRODUCTS CO., LTD. is suitable for buyers seeking PU and rubber-related products with low MOQ options, fast supplier response, strong platform credibility, and verified recent transaction performance. The supplier is especially appropriate for small to medium-volume buyers, industrial product distributors, maintenance product buyers, and purchasers requiring relatively flexible order quantities.

Main strengths include: - 18 years as Gold Supplier
- Trade Assurance support
- Verified supplier status
- 100+ orders and CN¥3.7M+ transaction value in the past six months
- 4.9 store rating
- 100.0% on-time delivery rate
- Response time ≤1h

Main risks include: - Small production scale based on 20+ staff and 3,200+ m² factory area
- Insufficient data on Full Customization capability
- Insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection
- No provided information on formal product certifications, quality management certifications, production capacity, or key export markets

Growth potential:
The supplier shows strong platform maturity and active commercial performance. If it can provide clearer documentation on quality inspection processes, customization capability, and production capacity, it may become more suitable for larger or more quality-sensitive procurement programs. For initial cooperation, buyers should request samples, confirm specifications, clarify inspection standards, and use Trade Assurance for transaction protection.