Huiju Qida (Beijing) Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Huiju Qida (Beijing) Garment Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Beijing with a reported factory area of 420+㎡ and 10+ staff. Based on the available data, the supplier appears to be a small-scale operating entity with basic production capability and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is supported by 2 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and platform labels including Low MOQ for customization, Finished Product Inspection, and ODM service available. Commercial performance is modest, with 50+ orders and CN¥47.3K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.4 store rating but only 9 reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a 97.0% on-time shipment rate. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ sourcing, sample orders, trial procurement, or small-batch customized products. However, limited scale, low review volume, and relatively short Gold Supplier history should be considered before placing large-volume or high-risk orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company: Huiju Qida (Beijing) Garment Co., Ltd.
• Country/Region: China, Beijing
• Factory area: 420+㎡
• Employees: 10+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a relatively small factory area of 420+㎡ and a workforce of 10+ staff. This indicates a small-scale production structure rather than a large industrial manufacturing base. The presence of verified supplier status provides some level of credibility, but the available data does not include detailed factory audit reports, production line quantity, monthly capacity, machinery list, or formal factory certifications.

The small employee base and limited factory area suggest that the supplier may be better positioned for low-volume orders, flexible sourcing, trial orders, or small-batch production rather than large-scale continuous procurement. The company has basic operational capability, but the current data is insufficient to confirm high-volume production stability.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic production capacity and has verified supplier status, which prevents it from being categorized as weak or unverifiable. However, the factory size and staff count are both small, and there is no available evidence of large-scale manufacturing infrastructure, advanced factory certification, or significant production capacity. Therefore, the score falls within the “small but basic production capability” range.

Final Score

11 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / industry labels:
• Low MOQ for customization
• Finished product inspection
• ODM service available
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has several positive platform credibility indicators. It is listed as a Gold Supplier with 2 years of membership and supports Trade Assurance, which provides buyers with a basic transaction protection mechanism. The supplier also carries platform labels related to low MOQ customization, finished product inspection, and ODM service availability.

However, the Gold Supplier duration is still relatively short at 2 years. While verified supplier status and Trade Assurance improve trustworthiness, the data does not show long-term platform history, internationally recognized compliance certifications, or detailed audit documentation. Certification label coverage is useful but not extensive enough to confirm a mature compliance system.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has core credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and relevant operational labels. These factors support a reasonable level of platform trust. However, the short 2-year Gold Supplier history and lack of broader compliance certification information limit the score from reaching the top tier.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 50+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥47.3K+
• Store rating: 4.4
• Number of reviews: 9

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded 50+ orders over the past six months, which indicates some active commercial transactions on the platform. The transaction value of CN¥47.3K+ suggests that order scale is relatively modest. The store rating of 4.4 is acceptable, but not exceptionally high, and the review count of 9 is limited.

The available business data shows that the supplier has market activity and transaction validation, but the commercial scale remains relatively small. Low review volume also limits confidence in long-term buyer satisfaction and repeatability of service quality.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier does not lack transaction history, as it has 50+ recent orders and measurable transaction value. However, compared with stronger suppliers, the transaction amount and review count are limited. The 4.4 rating is fair but not outstanding. This supports a mid-to-low business performance score, reflecting moderate but not strong market validation.

Final Score

12 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Customization-related labels:
• Low MOQ for customization
• ODM service available
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. This is not as strong as suppliers responding within one hour, but it still reflects reasonable responsiveness for online procurement communication.

The supplier has labels indicating Low MOQ for customization and ODM service availability. These are positive indicators of customization capability. However, the data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization,” so the supplier’s ability to handle deep customization, private mold development, complex specification changes, or fully bespoke production remains insufficiently evidenced.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates normal-to-good service responsiveness and some customization-related capability. However, because the response time is not within the strongest ≤1h tier and Full Customization is not confirmed, the score should remain in the middle range rather than the top range.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time shipment rate: 97.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time shipment rate is 97.0%, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. Based on the scoring standard, any on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. A 97.0% rate suggests that the supplier has been able to fulfill orders within agreed timelines in most recorded cases.

However, the delivery score should still be viewed alongside the overall business volume. Since recent order volume is 50+, the delivery performance is positive but based on a moderate transaction base rather than a very large order sample.

Scoring Rationale

The 97.0% on-time shipment rate clearly exceeds the 90% benchmark for top-tier delivery scoring. Although order scale is not large, the available delivery data is strong and supports a high score.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.4
• Reviews: 9
• Finished Product Inspection: Present as platform label
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.4, which indicates generally acceptable customer feedback. The presence of a Finished Product Inspection label is a positive quality-control indicator, suggesting that finished goods inspection is part of the supplier’s declared platform capability. Verified supplier status also provides additional credibility.

However, the number of reviews is only 9, which is a limited sample size. This makes it difficult to draw strong conclusions about consistent product quality across many buyers or order types. The available data does not include defect rates, return rates, inspection reports, buyer complaint details, third-party quality certifications, or factory audit findings.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has useful quality-related indicators, including finished product inspection and verified supplier status. The 4.4 rating is acceptable, but the limited number of reviews reduces confidence in the reliability and representativeness of customer feedback. Therefore, the supplier fits the range of good basic quality assurance, but not the top tier.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended.

Huiju Qida (Beijing) Garment Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ orders, trial purchases, small-batch procurement, or ODM-related sourcing where flexibility and manageable order size are more important than large-scale production capacity. The supplier’s strongest points are its 97.0% on-time shipment rate, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and finished product inspection label.

However, buyers should be cautious with large-volume or long-term procurement commitments due to several limitations: small factory scale, 10+ staff, limited transaction value, only 9 reviews, and short 2-year Gold Supplier history. Full Customization capability is also Insufficient Data.

A practical procurement approach would be to begin with sample orders or small trial batches, verify product quality through inspection, and gradually increase order volume only after confirming consistency in communication, delivery, and finished product quality. The supplier shows growth potential for smaller customized orders, but current data does not support classification as a large-scale strategic supplier.