Nantong Wang& Sheng Textiles Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Nantong Wang& Sheng Textiles Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Nantong Wang& Sheng Textiles Co., Ltd. is a China-based textile supplier located in Jiangsu, with reported factory space of 45,000+㎡ and 180+ staff. The supplier focuses on woven and yarn-dyed fabrics, including poly-cotton checked fabric, flannel rayon blend fabric, lightweight shirt fabric, cotton woven fabric, and polyester/cotton fabric, with MOQs ranging from 500 to 1,500 meters. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 7 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status. Operational indicators show 100.0% on-time delivery and a 5.0 store rating, but commercial validation remains limited due to only 10+ orders and 1 review in the past six months. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking medium-scale textile sourcing with verified factory capacity and reliable delivery, while buyers requiring extensive customer feedback, proven large-volume transaction history, or documented product inspection systems should conduct further due diligence.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory location: Jiangsu, China
• Factory area: 45,000+㎡
• Employees: 180+ staff
• Verified/audited supplier: True
• Product scope includes multiple woven and yarn-dyed textile fabric categories

Elaboration

The supplier reports a sizeable production site of more than 45,000㎡, which indicates a relatively strong physical manufacturing base for textile production. The workforce of 180+ staff suggests the company has more than a small workshop-level operation and likely possesses organized production, sales, and operational functions. The presence of verified supplier status further supports the credibility of its factory information.

The product range shown is focused and consistent within woven fabrics, including checked woven fabric, flannel yarn-dyed fabric, cotton woven fabric, lightweight shirt fabric, and polyester/cotton fabric. This indicates specialization in textile fabric supply rather than a fragmented product portfolio. However, the provided data does not include detailed monthly production capacity, machinery lists, production lines, annual output, or specific factory audit reports.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates strong basic manufacturing capacity through large factory space, a moderate workforce, and verified supplier status. These indicators place it above a small or basic supplier. However, the absence of detailed production capacity data and specific audit documentation prevents assigning a near-perfect score. It is best assessed as a stable medium-to-large textile supplier with credible but not fully quantified production strength.

Final Score

18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified/audited supplier: True
• Platform tags: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
• Other certification or industry compliance labels: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has been an Gold Supplier for 7 years, which provides a meaningful platform history and suggests continued platform operation rather than a newly listed or short-term supplier. Trade Assurance availability adds transactional protection for buyers and improves procurement confidence. Verified supplier status further strengthens platform credibility.

The available platform tags highlight response efficiency and delivery reliability, both of which are positive operational indicators. However, the data does not show specific third-party certifications, factory management certifications, textile compliance certifications, or product-related compliance documentation. Therefore, compliance credibility is strong at the platform level but not fully supported by broader certification evidence.

Scoring Rationale

A 7-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status form a relatively complete credibility profile. This justifies a high score. The score is not maximized because certification and industry compliance details are not provided, and the listed tags are operational rather than formal compliance certifications.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 10+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥338K+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 10 orders and over CN¥338K in transaction value during the past six months. This demonstrates real commercial activity on the platform, but the transaction volume is not high compared with suppliers that show large order counts and broader buyer feedback. The store rating is 5.0, which is positive, but it is based on only 1 review, making the rating statistically weak as a representation of buyer satisfaction.

The business performance data indicates that the supplier has active sales and some verified transaction history, but customer validation remains limited. For procurement teams, the relatively low order count and very small review base mean that additional checks should be conducted before placing large or strategically important orders.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has measurable commercial activity and a positive rating, but the order count and review quantity are limited. CN¥338K+ in six-month transaction value suggests some market acceptance, yet it does not demonstrate high-volume or highly diversified buyer demand. The 5.0 rating is favorable but carries limited weight due to only one review. Therefore, the supplier fits the lower end of stable business performance rather than high-performance commercial validation.

Final Score

13 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Platform tag: “Response time ≤2h”
• Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
• Other customization service information: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

A response time of within two hours is a positive service indicator and suggests the supplier can maintain reasonably efficient communication with buyers. This is important for textile sourcing, where quotation confirmation, fabric specifications, color selection, sample coordination, and order follow-up often require frequent communication.

However, the provided data does not state whether the supplier supports Full Customization, sample customization, pattern customization, private label service, special weaving requirements, or buyer-specific packaging. Therefore, while communication responsiveness appears good, the broader service capability cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well on response efficiency, but the response time is ≤2h rather than ≤1h, and there is no data confirming strong customization capability. Because customization information is insufficient, the supplier cannot be scored in the highest service tier. The score reflects solid basic service responsiveness with unverified advanced service capacity.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
• Platform tag: “On-time delivery 100.0%”

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a very strong delivery performance indicator. For textile procurement, delivery reliability is critical because fabric delays can disrupt garment production schedules, sampling timelines, and downstream customer commitments.

The data does not provide the total number of shipments behind this percentage, so the scale of delivery performance cannot be fully verified. However, based strictly on the reported on-time delivery rate, the supplier meets the highest scoring category for this dimension.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier reports 100.0%, it deserves the maximum score for delivery performance. The only limitation is that the shipment sample size is not provided, but the available metric itself is excellent.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1
• Verified/audited supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: True / verified supplier status provided
• Other quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is positive. However, this rating is supported by only 1 review, making the customer feedback base very limited. A single review is not enough to confidently assess consistency in product quality, complaint handling, repeat buyer satisfaction, or long-term performance.

Verified supplier status contributes positively to quality assurance because it indicates that some level of supplier verification has been completed. However, the data does not confirm whether Finished Product Inspection is available, nor does it provide textile-specific quality certifications, inspection reports, defect rate data, or customer complaint records. As a result, the supplier shows basic quality credibility, but not a fully proven quality management profile.

Scoring Rationale

The 5.0 rating and verified supplier status support a moderate-to-good quality score. However, the extremely low review count and lack of Finished Product Inspection data materially reduce confidence. The supplier has positive quality signals, but the available evidence is not strong enough to classify it as having a complete and well-validated quality assurance system.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cautious cooperation, especially for medium-scale textile fabric sourcing.

Nantong Wang& Sheng Textiles Co., Ltd. shows strong factory fundamentals, including 45,000+㎡ factory space, 180+ staff, verified supplier status, 7 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and 100.0% on-time delivery. These factors make it a credible option for buyers sourcing woven, yarn-dyed, cotton, polyester/cotton, rayon blend, and lightweight shirt fabrics.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers seeking medium-volume fabric procurement
- Apparel manufacturers requiring woven or yarn-dyed fabric supply
- Importers who value Trade Assurance and verified supplier status
- Buyers willing to start with trial orders before scaling volume

Main risks:
- Only 1 review, making customer feedback insufficient
- Only 10+ orders in the past six months, indicating limited platform transaction validation
- Finished Product Inspection information is not provided
- Full Customization capability is not confirmed
- Detailed production capacity, machinery, and textile compliance certifications are not provided

Growth potential:
The supplier has solid infrastructure and platform credibility. If it can build more transaction history, accumulate more customer reviews, provide clearer inspection processes, and disclose additional quality or compliance certifications, its procurement attractiveness would improve significantly.