zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Lustergift Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Lustergift Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 1,200+㎡ and 40+ staff. The company appears to operate as a small-to-medium manufacturing supplier with verified supplier status, 12 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and platform performance indicators including 1,000+ orders and CN¥3.5M+ transaction value over the past six months. Its listed products are mainly portable, wireless, Bluetooth, RGB, and speaker-related items, with low MOQs ranging from 1 to 10 pieces, making it potentially suitable for small-batch buyers, online sellers, trial orders, and customized consumer electronics sourcing where flexible order quantities are important. The supplier shows strong commercial activity, good customer feedback with a 4.7 store rating and 400+ reviews, and solid delivery performance at 92.9% on-time delivery. However, available data does not confirm Full Customization capability, Finished Product Inspection, or detailed factory audit scope, so quality-system depth remains partially unverified.

Shenzhen Lustergift Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 1,200+㎡
- Employees: 40+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a defined manufacturing location, a reported factory area above 1,200㎡, and a workforce of more than 40 employees. This indicates an operational production base rather than a purely trading profile, although the scale is not large compared with major industrial manufacturers. The verified supplier status adds credibility to its company profile and supports the view that it has basic manufacturing and supply capability.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates stable small-to-medium production capability, supported by physical factory size, staff count, and supplier verification. However, the available data does not show a large-scale factory footprint, high employee volume, advanced production lines, or detailed factory audit certifications. Therefore, it fits better into the “small-to-medium but operationally capable” category rather than a large-scale supply-chain manufacturer.

Final Score: 14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 12 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/platform labels: “Response time ≤6h”, “On-time delivery 92.9%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a long Gold Supplier history of 12 years, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with additional transaction protection, while verified supplier status further strengthens trustworthiness. The available platform labels mainly reflect service and delivery performance rather than product certifications or industry compliance certificates.

Scoring Rationale:
A 12-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status form a strong platform credibility foundation. The main limitation is that no specific product compliance certifications, factory audit certificates, or industry-standard certifications are provided in the dataset. As a result, the supplier scores high for platform credibility, but not at the maximum level for complete compliance documentation.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past six months: 1,000+
- Transaction value in past six months: CN¥3.5M+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 400+

Elaboration:
The supplier shows strong recent marketplace activity, with more than 1,000 orders and over CN¥3.5M in transaction value in the past six months. A 4.7 store rating and more than 400 reviews indicate meaningful customer interaction and a reasonably broad base of transaction feedback. These figures suggest that the supplier has active commercial demand and is not dependent on limited or isolated orders.

Scoring Rationale:
The combination of high order volume, significant recent transaction value, and a good rating supports a strong business performance assessment. The 4.7 rating is positive, though not perfect, and the review count is substantial enough to provide commercial validation. Based strictly on the data, the supplier demonstrates high market activity and reliable transaction performance.

Final Score: 18 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤6h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of within six hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international sourcing, though it does not reach the strongest benchmark of response within one hour. Product titles include terms such as “OEM” and “Custom,” but the dataset does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability, so this cannot be treated as verified service strength.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a reasonable response speed, which supports normal buyer communication and inquiry handling. However, because Full Customization is not confirmed and response time is not within the highest-performance range, the service capability should be considered solid but not outstanding. The score reflects adequate responsiveness with incomplete evidence on customization depth.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 92.9%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 92.9% exceeds the 90% benchmark. This indicates good delivery reliability and suggests that most orders are shipped within the expected timeframe. For procurement teams, this metric is especially relevant when evaluating suppliers for repeat orders, online retail replenishment, or time-sensitive product launches.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. Since the rate is clearly above the threshold but not close to perfect, a high but not maximum score is appropriate.

Final Score: 9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 400+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier has a good customer rating of 4.7 and more than 400 reviews, which provides meaningful feedback coverage. Verified supplier status supports basic trust in the company profile. However, the data does not confirm whether Finished Product Inspection is available, nor does it provide detailed information on formal factory verification scope, inspection procedures, defect control, or quality management certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
Customer feedback is positive and supported by a substantial number of reviews, which strengthens confidence in product and service consistency. However, the absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection and detailed quality-system documentation limits the score. The supplier appears to have good marketplace feedback, but the quality assurance system cannot be fully validated from the provided data.

Final Score: 15 / 20

Total Score

81 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled procurement scope. Shenzhen Lustergift Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume sourcing, low-MOQ trial orders, online retail products, promotional electronics, or speaker-related consumer electronic items. Its key strengths are long platform history, Trade Assurance support, strong recent transaction performance, good customer feedback, and 92.9% on-time delivery.

Main risks include limited confirmed factory scale, lack of explicit Full Customization verification, and Insufficient Data regarding Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory audit scope, and formal product compliance certifications. For first-time cooperation, buyers should request product samples, confirm inspection standards, verify customization capabilities, and clarify applicable compliance requirements before placing larger orders. The supplier shows good growth potential for repeat small-to-mid-sized procurement if quality consistency is confirmed through sample testing and early-batch inspection.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sanlida Electrical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Sanlida Electrical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shandong Oppair Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Oppair Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yoko Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yoko Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dinggin Hardware (Dalian) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dinggin Hardware (Dalian) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Columbia Bit Tool (Yangjiang)Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Columbia Bit Tool (Yangjiang)Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Tianya Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Tianya Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kuaima Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kuaima Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sencan Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sencan Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Meirun Machinery Manufacturing Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Meirun Machinery Manufacturing Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yangxi Feifan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangxi Feifan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Dongcheng Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Dongcheng Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaoning Junxi Bearing Co., Ltd., Supplier Evaluation
Liaoning Junxi Bearing Co., Ltd., Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jianghe New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jianghe New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zhixia Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zhixia Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Baibang Xinhui Knitting Textile Sales Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Baibang Xinhui Knitting Textile Sales Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Tiansheng Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Tiansheng Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Zanying Optoelectronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Zanying Optoelectronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Meidong Acoustics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Meidong Acoustics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huiju Qida (Beijing) Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huiju Qida (Beijing) Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Yu Xin Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Yu Xin Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026