Qingzhou Mihe Chengxin Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Qingzhou Mihe Chengxin Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based packaging supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of over 15,000㎡ and more than 100 staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a medium-sized and commercially active supplier suitable for buyers seeking plastic packaging-related products with relatively low MOQ options ranging from 1,000 to 10,000 pieces. Its profile shows 4 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, response time within 1 hour, finished product inspection, and 3D design capabilities. Business performance is relatively strong, with 60+ orders and CN¥5.2M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 20+ reviews. The supplier is best suited for small to mid-sized buyers or growing brands requiring responsive communication, stable delivery, and verified platform transaction protection. However, data on full customization, detailed factory certifications, and broader quality systems remains insufficient.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 15,000+㎡
- Employees: 100+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Shandong, China

Elaboration:
The supplier has a moderate physical production base with over 15,000㎡ of factory space and more than 100 employees. This indicates a structured manufacturing operation rather than a very small trading or workshop-style supplier. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s stated operational presence, although the data does not provide specific factory audit reports, production line count, machinery details, or formal factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates stable medium-scale production capacity. The factory size and workforce are sufficient for regular B2B supply, and verified supplier status supports basic credibility. However, the available data does not prove large-scale industrial capacity or advanced factory certification, so it should not be scored at the top tier.

Final Score: 17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, 3D design capabilities, Finished product inspection, Response time ≤1h

Elaboration:
The supplier has a complete basic credibility structure, including Gold Supplier membership, Trade Assurance, and several operational labels. Four years as a Gold Supplier suggests a reasonable platform history, though not a very long-established record. Trade Assurance improves buyer protection, while finished product inspection and warranty availability strengthen platform-level confidence.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has strong platform credibility due to Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier information, and relevant quality/service labels. The 4-year Gold Supplier duration is credible but not long enough to be considered a highly mature long-term platform record. No additional third-party certifications are provided beyond the listed platform labels.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 60+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥5.2M+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 20+

Elaboration:
The supplier shows meaningful recent transaction activity, with more than 60 orders and over CN¥5.2M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates active buyer engagement and commercial validation. The 4.9 store rating is strong, although the review count of 20+ is moderate rather than extensive.

Scoring Rationale:
The transaction value is strong and the order count indicates stable sales activity. The high rating supports positive buyer satisfaction, but the limited review volume prevents a maximum score because customer feedback depth is not yet large enough to fully validate long-term performance across many buyers.

Final Score: 18 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: ≤1h
- 3D design capabilities: listed
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates strong response speed, with communication response time within one hour. The presence of 3D design capabilities suggests some level of design support, which may be useful for buyers requiring product visualization or packaging development support. However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability.

Scoring Rationale:
The response time meets the highest service-speed standard. However, because Full Customization is not confirmed, the supplier cannot be rated as having fully proven strong customization capability. The 3D design label supports service flexibility, but customization depth remains insufficiently documented.

Final Score: 8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 96.9%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 96.9%, which is above the 90% benchmark for strong delivery performance. This indicates reliable fulfillment behavior based on the available platform data.

Scoring Rationale:
A 96.9% on-time delivery rate qualifies for the highest scoring range. While additional logistics data, lead times, and export shipment history are not provided, the available delivery metric is strong.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 20+
- Finished product inspection: listed
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory Verification: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier has a high store rating and includes finished product inspection among its listed platform labels. This indicates a basic quality control mechanism at the final product stage. The verified supplier status adds credibility, but the data does not specifically confirm Factory Verification or detailed quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The quality profile is positive due to the 4.9 rating, finished product inspection, and verified supplier status. However, the review count is only moderate, and there is insufficient data on deeper factory verification or certified quality systems. Therefore, the supplier is strong but not fully top-tier in quality validation.

Final Score: 17 / 20

Total Score

88 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended, especially for small to mid-sized buyers, packaging distributors, and brands seeking responsive suppliers with verified transaction protection and stable recent sales performance. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, good commercial activity, fast communication, and excellent on-time delivery performance.

Main risks include insufficient data on Full Customization, lack of detailed factory certification information, and only moderate review volume. Growth potential is positive if the supplier can provide more evidence of factory audits, customization capability, quality certifications, and larger-scale customer feedback records.