zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangdong Hongdali Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

13.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Guangdong Hongdali Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based packaging supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 13,000+ m² and 190+ staff. The company focuses on vacuum storage bag products, including mattress vacuum storage bags, household compression bags, transparent vacuum storage bags, and dustproof vacuum storage bags. Its platform profile shows a relatively strong credibility base, including 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and listed capability or quality-related tags such as 3D design capabilities, low MOQ for customization, and finished product inspection. Commercial performance is also supported by 200+ orders and CN¥2.6M+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 4.7 store rating based on 40+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking vacuum storage bag products with low MOQ options and moderate-to-stable transaction validation. Key limitations include a response time of ≤3h rather than ≤1h, an 85.4% on-time dispatch rate, and limited customer feedback volume compared with higher-scale suppliers.

Guangdong Hongdali Packaging Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 13,000+ m²
- Employees: 190+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base with a factory area above 13,000 m² and a workforce of more than 190 employees. This indicates a medium-to-large operational footprint for the vacuum storage bag category. The verified supplier status further supports the existence and credibility of its manufacturing setup, although no additional factory audit certificate or external factory certification beyond the provided verification status is stated.

Scoring Rationale:
The combination of a 13,000+ m² facility and 190+ staff suggests stronger-than-basic production capacity and organizational scale. However, the available data does not include detailed production lines, monthly output, machinery count, or third-party factory certification beyond verified supplier status. Therefore, the company is positioned above a typical small factory but not scored at the maximum level for large-scale supply chain stability.

Final Score: 17/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: 3D design capabilities, Low MOQ for customization, Finished product inspection

Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates a solid platform credibility profile. Seven years as a Gold Supplier indicates an established platform presence, while Trade Assurance provides transaction protection for buyers. The verified supplier status and listed platform tags add further credibility, particularly around design capability, customization flexibility, and finished product inspection.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has the core credibility elements typically expected from a reliable supplier: Gold Supplier status, multi-year platform history, Trade Assurance, and verification. The 7-year duration is meaningful and supports trustworthiness, though the provided data does not include additional internationally recognized compliance certificates or detailed audit reports. This supports a high but not perfect score.

Final Score: 18/20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 200+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2.6M+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 40+

Elaboration:
The supplier shows active recent commercial performance. More than 200 orders and CN¥2.6M+ in transactions over six months demonstrate meaningful buyer activity and revenue validation on the platform. The 4.7 store rating is positive, while the 40+ review count provides some customer feedback, though the review volume is not especially large relative to the order count.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a strong recent transaction record, especially considering both order count and transaction amount. The 4.7 rating supports positive buyer satisfaction. However, the review base of 40+ is moderate rather than extensive, which limits the depth of customer-side validation. Overall, the business performance is above average and commercially credible, but not at the very highest level.

Final Score: 17/20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Customization-related tag: Low MOQ for customization
- Design-related tag: 3D design capabilities

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of within three hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour. The presence of “Low MOQ for customization” and “3D design capabilities” suggests the supplier can support certain customization needs, particularly for buyers requiring lower-volume customized orders or design-related support.

Scoring Rationale:
Service capability is supported by customization and design-related platform tags, which is a positive factor for buyers needing product adaptation. However, the response time is not at the highest service tier, and the data does not provide details on dedicated account management, language capabilities, sample lead time, or after-sales process. Therefore, the supplier fits a normal-to-good service level rather than a premium service profile.

Final Score: 8/10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time dispatch rate: 85.4%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate is 85.4%, placing it within the 80–89% performance band. This indicates that most shipments are dispatched on time, but there remains a noticeable risk of delay compared with suppliers exceeding 90%.

Scoring Rationale:
Based strictly on the provided scoring rule, an on-time dispatch rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. Since 85.4% is in the middle of this band, the supplier receives a balanced score within this range. Buyers with strict delivery windows should monitor lead times and confirm dispatch commitments before ordering.

Final Score: 8/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 40+
- Finished product inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.7 and a moderate number of reviews at 40+. The presence of “Finished product inspection” indicates that a quality check process is listed on the platform. Verified supplier status also adds credibility to the supplier’s operational profile. However, the data does not include detailed defect rates, inspection standards, product test reports, or third-party quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a good rating and some quality assurance indicators, especially finished product inspection. However, the review count is moderate rather than large, and no detailed quality certification or inspection documentation is provided. This supports a good quality feedback score, but the lack of deeper quality evidence prevents a top-tier assessment.

Final Score: 16/20

Total Score

84/100

Procurement Recommendation

Guangdong Hongdali Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. is recommended for cooperation, particularly for buyers sourcing vacuum storage bags, household compression bags, mattress storage bags, and related space-saving storage products. It is most suitable for small to medium-sized importers, e-commerce sellers, and buyers requiring low MOQ customization with verified platform credibility.

Key risks include moderate review volume, an on-time dispatch rate of 85.4%, and a response time of ≤3h rather than the strongest ≤1h benchmark. Buyers should confirm delivery schedules, customization specifications, inspection requirements, and order terms before placing larger-volume orders.

Overall, the supplier shows strong platform credibility, solid factory scale, verified recent transaction performance, and reasonable quality indicators. Its growth potential is positive if it improves delivery reliability, expands review volume, and provides more detailed quality documentation.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Xuzhou Datianxia Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Datianxia Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Boyang Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Boyang Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Chenran Packaging Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Chenran Packaging Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Xindingchi Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Xindingchi Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hexu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hexu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Aodiliya Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Aodiliya Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiajianle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiajianle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhifang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhifang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhongyan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhongyan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yufan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yufan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Rixian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Rixian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shanan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shanan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Fuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Fuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Eraclean Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Eraclean Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Roman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Roman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Empress Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Empress Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
New Newton (Taizhou) Forklift Truck Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
New Newton (Taizhou) Forklift Truck Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Zhejiang Horus Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Horus Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Dahe Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Dahe Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiaxing Ochs Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiaxing Ochs Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Maike Digital Imaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Maike Digital Imaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fucai Shu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fucai Shu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Jnod Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Jnod Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Hee Industrial Belt Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Hee Industrial Belt Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Zhongantaihua Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Zhongantaihua Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu City Novelty Party Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu City Novelty Party Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Husurg (Shandong) New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Husurg (Shandong) New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Mooge Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Mooge Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Kafan Machinery & Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Kafan Machinery & Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sturdyarmor New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sturdyarmor New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Dongtai Solar Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Dongtai Solar Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Hi-Tech Zone Embody Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Hi-Tech Zone Embody Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sihuiwei (Donggguan) Technology Development Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Sihuiwei (Donggguan) Technology Development Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Twinjet Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Twinjet Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Biobase Biotech (Jinan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Biobase Biotech (Jinan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Artigifts Premium Metal & Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Artigifts Premium Metal & Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinghua Lianfu Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinghua Lianfu Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026