Shandong Aike Holding Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shandong Aike Holding Group Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of 23,000+ m² and 110+ staff. The company offers multiple air-conditioning and HVAC-related products, including low-MOQ air conditioners, water air conditioners, rooftop packaged air handling units, and ceiling directional blow units. Its platform profile shows 4 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and an on-time delivery rate of 94.4%. Business activity over the past six months includes 30+ orders and CN¥608.5K+ transaction value, supported by a 5.0 store rating but only 9 reviews. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ HVAC products and moderate-volume sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection. Key limitations are the relatively small review base and insufficient data on customization capability and formal quality inspection systems.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
The supplier reports a factory area of 23,000+ m², 110+ staff, and verified supplier status. The company is located in Shandong, China.

Elaboration:
A 23,000+ m² facility indicates a meaningful physical production base rather than a very small workshop-scale operation. The staff size of 110+ suggests the company has a structured workforce capable of supporting production, sales, and operational activities. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the stated company profile, although no detailed factory audit report, production line count, equipment list, or annual capacity data is provided.

Scoring Rationale:
Based on the available data, the supplier fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory. The factory area is substantial, and the workforce size is adequate for regular production operations. However, the absence of detailed production capacity, machinery information, or specific factory certification prevents it from being classified as a large-scale highly mature supply chain.

Final Score: 16/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
The supplier is listed as an Gold Supplier for 4 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier. Platform tags include “Response time ≤3h” and “On-time delivery 94.4%.”

Elaboration:
The 4-year Gold Supplier history indicates a continued platform presence but not a very long operating record on . Trade Assurance provides transactional protection for buyers, which strengthens procurement security. Verified supplier status improves credibility, but the provided data does not include detailed third-party audit scope, compliance certificates, management system certifications, or product-specific certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has the core platform trust signals expected from a credible supplier: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. However, the Gold Supplier tenure is moderate rather than long-term, and certification information is limited to platform-level tags rather than comprehensive compliance documentation. This supports a solid but not top-tier score.

Final Score: 16/20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
The supplier recorded 30+ orders and CN¥608.5K+ transaction value in the past six months. The store rating is 5.0, with 9 reviews.

Elaboration:
The transaction value of CN¥608.5K+ over six months shows measurable commercial activity. The 30+ order count indicates active buyer engagement, though it does not represent very high-volume platform performance. The 5.0 rating is positive, but the review count of 9 is relatively limited, meaning the rating is based on a small customer feedback sample.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates verified recent sales activity with a moderate number of orders and a reasonable transaction amount. However, the commercial evidence is not strong enough to classify the supplier as a high-volume, highly validated seller. The low number of reviews reduces the statistical strength of the 5.0 rating.

Final Score: 15/20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
The supplier’s stated communication response time is ≤3h. No data is provided regarding Full Customization support.

Elaboration:
A response time within 3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international procurement, especially during early inquiry and quotation stages. However, the available data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM/ODM services, technical design adaptation, private labeling, or project-based engineering support.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates normal responsiveness but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response time ≤1 hour. Since customization capability is not provided, it must be treated as Insufficient Data rather than assumed. This limits the score to a moderate level.

Final Score: 7/10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is reported as 94.4%.

Elaboration:
A 94.4% on-time delivery rate is above the 90% threshold and indicates relatively reliable delivery performance based on the provided platform data. This is a meaningful strength for buyers concerned about order scheduling and shipment reliability.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. The supplier’s 94.4% performance supports a strong delivery score, though it is not perfect and no additional data is provided on lead time consistency, urgent order handling, or logistics dispute history.

Final Score: 9/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
The supplier has a 5.0 store rating and 9 reviews. Verified supplier status is provided. Data on Finished Product Inspection is not provided.

Elaboration:
The 5.0 rating is a positive signal, but the review count is limited, making the feedback base relatively small. Verified supplier status supports basic credibility, but the available data does not confirm whether Finished Product Inspection, third-party quality inspection, product testing reports, or formal quality management certifications are in place.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier receives credit for its high rating and verified status, but the small number of reviews and lack of confirmed inspection systems reduce confidence in long-term quality consistency. Since Finished Product Inspection data is missing, it must be marked as Insufficient Data and cannot be credited in the score.

Final Score: 14/20

Total Score

Company Strength: 16/20
Platform & Compliance Credibility: 16/20
Business Performance: 15/20
Service Capability: 7/10
Delivery Performance: 9/10
Quality & Customer Feedback: 14/20

Total Score: 77/100

Procurement Recommendation

Shandong Aike Holding Group Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers seeking low-MOQ HVAC or air-conditioning products through with Trade Assurance protection. The supplier is suitable for small to medium-volume buyers, trial orders, distributors testing product demand, and procurement teams that value platform verification and stable delivery performance.

Main strengths include a sizable reported factory area, 110+ staff, verified supplier status, 4-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, 94.4% on-time delivery, and recent transaction activity of CN¥608.5K+ over six months.

Main risks include limited customer review volume, insufficient data on Full Customization capability, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, and lack of provided product-specific certification or detailed factory audit documentation.

Overall, the supplier shows moderate-to-good procurement potential. A trial order, document verification, sample evaluation, and pre-shipment inspection are recommended before scaling to larger-volume purchases.