zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shanghai We Pack Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

12.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shanghai We Pack Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, with a reported factory area of 9,100+ sqm and 80+ staff. The company appears to have a moderate and operationally established production base, supported by verified supplier status on the platform. Its listed products are mainly plastic chairs, folding chairs, dining chairs, portable tables, and event-related furniture products, with low MOQs ranging from 1 to 2 pieces, which may suit buyers requiring flexible trial orders or small-batch sourcing.

From a platform credibility perspective, the supplier shows strong signals, including 7 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and a 97.6% on-time delivery rate. Business performance is also supported by 100+ orders and CN¥1.2M+ transaction value over the past six months. However, review volume is relatively limited at 20+, and no data is provided regarding Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, or specific product certifications. Overall, this supplier is suitable for small to mid-sized buyers seeking verified platform-backed sourcing with flexible order quantities.

Detailed Analysis

Shanghai We Pack Co., Ltd.

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shanghai, China
- Factory area: 9,100+ sqm
- Employee count: 80+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
Shanghai We Pack Co., Ltd. has a reported factory area of more than 9,100 sqm, which indicates a meaningful physical production or operational footprint. The company also reports more than 80 staff, suggesting it is not a very small workshop and has a basic organizational structure to support production, sales, and order handling.

The verified supplier status strengthens the credibility of the company’s operational profile. However, the available data does not include detailed production line numbers, monthly capacity, machinery information, factory audit reports, or specific manufacturing certifications. Therefore, while the company demonstrates a stable medium-scale operating base, the data is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale supply chain manufacturer.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows stronger-than-basic company strength due to its 9,100+ sqm facility, 80+ staff, and verified supplier status. These indicators support a stable medium-sized factory profile. However, the absence of production capacity data, equipment details, and factory certification information limits confidence in its ability to support large-volume or technically demanding procurement programs.

Final Score
17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Platform labels: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 97.6%”
- Industry or product certification data: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has been an Gold Supplier for 7 years, which is a positive platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance support also provides buyers with a structured transaction protection mechanism. In addition, verified supplier status improves confidence that the company has passed at least basic platform-level verification.

The available platform tags show response speed and delivery performance, but no detailed compliance certifications, product safety certifications, factory audit certifications, or industry-specific certificates are provided. Therefore, the supplier’s platform credibility is strong, but its formal compliance profile cannot be fully evaluated based on the current data.

Scoring Rationale
A 7-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status place the company in a strong credibility category. The score is not maximized because the data does not include complete certification labels, factory audit details, product compliance certificates, or third-party inspection documentation.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.2M+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Review count: 20+

Elaboration
The supplier has completed more than 100 orders in the past six months, with transaction value exceeding CN¥1.2M. This indicates an active commercial presence and a certain level of buyer acceptance on the platform. The 4.7 store rating is positive and suggests generally satisfactory buyer experience.

However, the review count is only 20+, which is relatively limited compared with the order volume. This means the visible customer feedback base is not large enough to fully validate long-term consistency across many buyers or markets. The business data supports stable mid-level performance rather than a high-volume, highly validated supplier profile.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of 100+ recent orders, CN¥1.2M+ transaction value, and a 4.7 rating reflects solid commercial activity. The score is moderated because the review count remains limited, and the data does not provide repeat buyer rate, export market distribution, major customer references, or order size breakdown.

Final Score
16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency beyond response time: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported response time of within 2 hours is a positive service indicator. It suggests that the company maintains reasonably active communication on the platform and can respond to inquiries within a commercially acceptable timeframe.

However, no data is provided regarding Full Customization, ODM/OEM support, design services, packaging customization, sample development, or multilingual sales support. As a result, the company’s service capability can only be assessed based on response speed, not on broader customization or project management capability.

Scoring Rationale
The response time is good, but it does not meet the highest benchmark of ≤1 hour. More importantly, there is no available evidence of Full Customization capability. Therefore, the supplier is assessed as having acceptable basic service capability, but not enough data to confirm advanced customization or complex buyer support.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 97.6%

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 97.6% is a strong performance indicator. This exceeds the 90% benchmark for top-tier delivery performance under the scoring framework.

A high on-time delivery rate is particularly relevant for buyers sourcing event furniture, folding chairs, portable tables, or seasonal products, where delivery timing can directly affect sales schedules or project execution. However, the data does not include average lead time, late shipment causes, logistics channels, or historical delivery volume.

Scoring Rationale
The 97.6% on-time delivery rate clearly supports a high delivery score. Since it is well above 90%, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery performance range. The score is strong despite limited supporting logistics details because the provided delivery metric itself is clear and measurable.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.7
- Review count: 20+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True, based on verified supplier status provided
- Product certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a 4.7 store rating, which indicates generally positive customer feedback. The verified supplier status also adds a basic level of confidence regarding company legitimacy and platform-level verification.

However, the review count is only 20+, which limits the depth of customer feedback analysis. In addition, there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, product testing procedures, defect rate control, quality certifications, or third-party inspection reports. Therefore, quality confidence is supported by rating and verification, but not by a complete quality assurance system.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier receives a solid but not top-tier score because the store rating is good and verified supplier status is positive. The score is reduced due to limited review volume and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, product compliance certifications, and formal quality control processes.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 17 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 83 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Shanghai We Pack Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers seeking platform-verified suppliers of plastic chairs, folding chairs, portable tables, and event-related furniture with low MOQ flexibility. The supplier is suitable for small to mid-sized importers, online retailers, event furniture distributors, and buyers who value fast response, Trade Assurance protection, and strong delivery performance.

The main advantages are its 7-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, 97.6% on-time delivery rate, and recent transaction activity of CN¥1.2M+ over six months. These factors indicate a commercially active and credible supplier profile.

Key risks include insufficient data on Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, product certifications, detailed factory audit results, and formal quality control systems. The review count of 20+ is also relatively limited, so buyers should request samples, inspection reports, product specifications, and pre-shipment inspection arrangements before placing larger orders.

Overall, the supplier shows good growth potential and is appropriate for trial orders and medium-scale procurement, but large-volume or compliance-sensitive buyers should conduct additional due diligence before committing to long-term contracts.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen Richest Pack Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Richest Pack Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinowell (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinowell (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Langjue Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Langjue Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kmcable Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kmcable Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yonghengsheng Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yonghengsheng Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongyu Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongyu Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Xinding Coatings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Xinding Coatings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Gongtao Ceramics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Gongtao Ceramics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sunbright Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sunbright Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Amsino Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Amsino Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Senwo Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Senwo Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gateo Shanghai Sports Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gateo Shanghai Sports Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yucai Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yucai Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Caiyibiao Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Caiyibiao Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Ranchao Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Ranchao Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Tinghao Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Tinghao Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sunshine Garden Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sunshine Garden Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Xmy Technology Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Xmy Technology Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Piaoyu International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Piaoyu International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Laizhou Sanhe Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Laizhou Sanhe Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ruitai Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ruitai Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Donghua Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Donghua Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunming Ansheng Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunming Ansheng Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Chaoxu Pneumatic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Chaoxu Pneumatic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tonglida Heavy Industry Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tonglida Heavy Industry Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Longli Package Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Longli Package Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chengda Auto Sales Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chengda Auto Sales Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Deniswear Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Deniswear Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Minzhen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Minzhen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Dongding Chemical Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Dongding Chemical Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Huili Special Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Huili Special Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Litong Oster Composite New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Litong Oster Composite New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Everich Commerce Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
Everich Commerce Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Ledio Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Ledio Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Muyuan Wire Mesh Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Muyuan Wire Mesh Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dezhou Chuanliang Special Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dezhou Chuanliang Special Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Chengxin Metal Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Chengxin Metal Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026