Zhejiang Huanlong New Material Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Zhejiang Huanlong New Material Science & Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with reported factory scale of over 100,000㎡ and more than 370 staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to have strong manufacturing infrastructure and a verified supplier status, indicating a solid production foundation for TPU-related materials such as TPU protective sheets, TPU laminate film, TPU fabric, TPU roll sheet, and waterproof TPU products. The supplier has been an Gold Supplier for 7 years and carries several platform labels, including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Minor Customization, and Warranty available. However, Trade Assurance is not supported, recent commercial performance is weak, and customer feedback data is insufficient, with 0 reviews and no available store rating. This supplier may be suitable for buyers prioritizing factory scale, TPU material sourcing, and basic customization, but buyers requiring strong platform transaction history or customer-validated quality evidence should proceed cautiously.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 100,000+㎡
- Employees: 370+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a relatively large manufacturing footprint, with over 100,000㎡ of factory space and more than 370 staff. This indicates a sizeable operational base compared with small workshops or trading-only entities. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of factory-level credibility within the provided data.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of large factory area, substantial workforce, and verified supplier status supports a strong score. While no additional factory audit certificates or detailed production capacity figures are provided, the available data is sufficient to classify the company as a large-scale and relatively stable supplier.

Final Score: 19 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
- Trade Assurance: False
- Labels: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Minor customization
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a 7-year Gold Supplier history, which indicates a meaningful period of platform presence. The verified supplier status and certification/industry labels provide additional credibility. However, the absence of Trade Assurance reduces transaction protection and weakens platform-backed buyer security.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has solid platform credibility through Gold Supplier status, supplier verification, and multiple operational labels. However, because Trade Assurance is not supported, the platform protection structure is not fully complete. This places the supplier below the highest credibility tier.

Final Score: 16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 0
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥6.7K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration
The supplier shows limited recent transaction activity on the platform. Although a transaction value of CN¥6.7K+ is recorded, the past six-month order count is 0, and there are no customer reviews. Store rating information is also missing, making it difficult to assess market acceptance or buyer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale
Commercial validation is weak based on the provided data. The absence of recent order volume, lack of reviews, and missing store rating significantly limit confidence in active platform performance. The small recorded transaction value provides only minimal evidence of commercial activity.

Final Score: 8 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤16h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Available customization-related labels: ODM service available, Minor customization

Elaboration
The supplier provides a response time within 16 hours, which is acceptable but not highly responsive compared with suppliers responding within one hour. The data confirms ODM service and minor customization, but there is no evidence of Full Customization capability.

Scoring Rationale
Service capability appears moderate. The supplier can support some customization-related needs, but the response speed is not fast enough for a top-tier service score, and full customization capability is not confirmed. This supports a mid-range service assessment.

Final Score: 6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Based strictly on the provided metric, this indicates strong delivery reliability.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has quality-related platform support through Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. However, customer-side quality validation is insufficient because there are no reviews and no available store rating. This creates a gap between internal quality assurance indicators and external buyer feedback.

Scoring Rationale
The presence of Finished Product Inspection and supplier verification supports basic quality assurance credibility. However, the lack of customer reviews and missing store rating prevent a higher score, as buyer feedback is a key indicator of real-world quality consistency.

Final Score: 13 / 20

Total Score

72 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with caution. Zhejiang Huanlong New Material Science & Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking TPU materials from a supplier with large factory scale, verified supplier status, ODM availability, minor customization, and strong reported delivery performance. It may be appropriate for buyers who can conduct their own sampling, technical verification, and quality inspection before placing larger orders.

Key risks include weak recent platform business performance, 0 reviews, missing store rating, no Trade Assurance support, and insufficient evidence of full customization capability. Growth potential exists due to the supplier’s large factory base, 7-year Gold Supplier history, Finished Product Inspection label, and broad TPU-related product offering, but buyers should use controlled trial orders and independent quality checks before scaling procurement.